Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2021  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 383--388

Rectal wall sparing effect of a rectal retractor in prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy


Hamed Ghaffari1, Aram Rostami2, Mahdieh Afkhami Ardekani3, Bahram Mofid4, Seied Rabi Mahdavi5 
1 Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences; Department of Medical Physics, Roshana Cancer Institute, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Radiology, Faculty of Para-Medicine, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar-Abbas, Iran
4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Shohada-e-Tajrish Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5 Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences; Radiation Biology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence Address:
Hamed Ghaffari
Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Iran
Seied Rabi Mahdavi
Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Iran

Purpose: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a rectal retractor (RR) designed to protect rectal tissue in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) by pushing rectal wall (RW) away from the prostate. Materials and Methods: Twelve patients with localized prostate cancer were enrolled into this study. Patients underwent two computed tomography (CT) scans without and with RR. A prescription of 80 Gy in 40 fractions was planned on CT scans with and without RR. This study evaluates the ability of the RR in RW dose reduction, in particular reduction of the RW V70Gy 25% in comparison with the plan without RR dose-volume histograms were generated with and without RR. The patient's tolerance was assessed by patient-reported outcomes. Results: The planning target volume coverage was equal for both without and with RR (P = 0.155). The mean dose to the RW was statistically significantly lower for the plan with RR than that for the plan without RR, a mean reduction of 5.8 Gy (P = 0.003). Significant relative reductions in rectal dose-volume parameters whether in absolute volume (cc) or as a percentage of contoured RW were detected. A relative reduction more than 25% in RW V70Gy(%) in 100% of patients was achieved. The rectal retraction resulted in a significant increase in the prostate to the rectum space at the prostate midgland level, an absolute increase of 2.7 mm. The retraction of the rectum induced a mean (±standard deviation) pain score of 2.7 (±1.3) according to the visual analog score. Conclusion: The application of a RR showed a remarkable rectal sparing effect during prostate IMRT. This may lead to reduced acute and late rectal toxicities in prostate IMRT.


How to cite this article:
Ghaffari H, Rostami A, Ardekani MA, Mofid B, Mahdavi SR. Rectal wall sparing effect of a rectal retractor in prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy.J Can Res Ther 2021;17:383-388


How to cite this URL:
Ghaffari H, Rostami A, Ardekani MA, Mofid B, Mahdavi SR. Rectal wall sparing effect of a rectal retractor in prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy. J Can Res Ther [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Jan 20 ];17:383-388
Available from: https://www.cancerjournal.net/article.asp?issn=0973-1482;year=2021;volume=17;issue=2;spage=383;epage=388;aulast=Ghaffari;type=0