Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2012  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 373--378

Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in female patients with postoperative recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer


Im Il Na1, Hye-Ryoun Kim1, Jin Kyung Lee2, Sun Hoo Park3, Cheol Hyeon Kim1, Jae Soo Koh3, Hee Jong Baek4, Du Hwan Choe5,  
1 Department of Internal Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
3 Department of Pathology, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
4 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
5 Department of Radiology, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence Address:
Im Il Na
Department of Internal Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, 215-4, Gongneung-dong, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 139-706
Korea

Abstract

Purpose: We did this retrospective study to explore the association between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and clinical features in postoperative recurrent female non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and Methods: We reviewed clinical data on 86 female patients who had postoperative recurrent disease between December 1992 and July 2007. The start of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy was treated as a censoring event. Corresponding surgical specimens of primary tumors were used to test for EGFR mutations. Results: Thirty patients presented with local recurrence and distant recurrence was identified in 56. Thirty-four of the 86 patients (40%) harbored EGFR mutations. Patients with distant recurrence were more likely to have EGFR mutations than patients with local recurrence (48% versus 23%; P = 0.024). On multivariate analysis, distant recurrence was associated with a high frequency of EGFR mutations (OR, 3.3; P = 0.028). Survival analysis showed poor survival of patients with mutated EGFR (HR, 2.3; P = 0.017) or with non-adenocarcinoma histology (HR, 3.3; P = 0.001). Conclusion: The association between recurrence pattern and EGFR mutation status was suggested in recurrent female NSCLC patients. In addition, our data indicate unfavorable disease process of EGFR mutated tumors. Further studies need to be conducted to validate these findings.



How to cite this article:
Na II, Kim HR, Lee JK, Park SH, Kim CH, Koh JS, Baek HJ, Choe DH. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in female patients with postoperative recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer.J Can Res Ther 2012;8:373-378


How to cite this URL:
Na II, Kim HR, Lee JK, Park SH, Kim CH, Koh JS, Baek HJ, Choe DH. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in female patients with postoperative recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer. J Can Res Ther [serial online] 2012 [cited 2022 May 28 ];8:373-378
Available from: https://www.cancerjournal.net/text.asp?2012/8/3/373/103515


Full Text

 Introduction



Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for the majority of deaths from lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer mortality. [1],[2] Although surgery is the initial preferred modality to achieve long-term survival, there is a high risk of postoperative recurrence. [3],[4] Due to the poor prognosis of recurrent disease, [5],[6] postoperative recurrence still remains an obstacle to improved outcomes. Thus, understanding the clinical course of postoperative recurrent disease is essential to guide effective treatment.

Recent studies have shown that the incidence of female lung cancer has risen over recent decades. [7],[8] Studies also suggest that a female patient with NSCLC is a unique entity compared with the male counterpart. [7],[9] Never-smokers and adenocarcinoma histology are predominant in female patients. [10],[11] In particular, molecular data have shown that female patients are associated with a high incidence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. [12]

According to Eastern studies, [13],[14],[15],[16],[17] Asian female NSCLC patients are predominantly never-smokers and are likely to have adenocarcinoma histology. Molecular studies have also reported that Eastern ethnicity is associated with a high incidence of EGFR mutation, [18] a factor that strongly predicts outcomes after treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as gefitinib or erlotinib. [19],[20]

Until now, p[atients with postoperative recurrence have generally been treated with systemic chemotherapy. However, investigators have reported different processes in postoperative recurrence compared with Stage IV disease. [6],[21] In addition, previous studies have suggested different recurrence patterns depending on mutational status or immunohistochemical subtypes in other solid tumors in females. [22],[23] However, in lung cancer patients, the significance of EGFR mutations with respect to recurrence patterns is uncertain.

In the current era of targeted therapy, EGFR mutations, which are predominant in female NSCLC patients, are suggested to have a role in the treatment with TKI at postoperative recurrence. [21],[24] However, the role of EGFR mutation when the effect of TKI therapy is excluded has not been fully evaluated. Despite recent data on TKI-naοve patients with advanced disease, [25] the disease process of mutated EGFR tumors in postoperative recurrent disease is uncertain. Thus, we did this retrospective study to explore the association between EGFR mutation and clinical features of postoperative female patients with recurrent NSCLC.

 Materials and Methods



Patients

Female patients with NSCLC who had recurrent disease after surgery between December 1992 and July 2007 were identified consecutively in the database of the Korea Cancer Center Hospital. Recurrence was diagnosed through physical examinations and diagnostic imaging of lesions, including computed tomography of the thorax with histological confirmation when clinically feasible. Recurrence was differentiated from primary lung cancer using criteria from Martini and Melamed. [26] We included resected female patients with available tissues for tests for mutations. Patients who were diagnosed as disseminated disease at the time of exploration were excluded. The institutional review board of the Korea Cancer Center Hospital approved this study.

The recurrence pattern was determined at the first site of disease recurrence using clinical assessment, imaging studies and additional data from procedures such as biopsy and bronchoscopy. Disease recurrence at the ipsilateral lung, bronchial stump, or regional lymph nodes, including the supraclavicular node, was considered a local recurrence. Presence of metastases at all other sites, including pleural seeding, chest wall, adrenal gland, bone, brain, contralateral lung, or distant nodes, was considered a distant recurrence.

EGFR genotyping

DNA extraction using paraffin-embedded tissues of resected primary tumors was performed as described elsewhere. [27] To detect the presence of EGFR mutations, pyrosequencing was performed using a previously described method. [28] Mutations in Exons 18, 19 and 21 were considered indicators of a mutated EGFR.

Statistical analysis

Univariate analysis of categorical variables was performed using Pearson's χ2 test. Stepwise backward logistic regression was used to analyze the clinical factors in terms of the presence of EGFR mutations. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the time of disease recurrence to the time of death from any cause. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank tests were performed for univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed using stepwise Cox regression. [29] Odds ratios (ORs), hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined. Stata version 9.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX) was used for statistical analyses. All P values were derived from two-sided tests, and P < 0.05 was considered significant.

 Results



Descriptive data and EGFR mutations

[Table 1] shows the characteristics of female patients with postoperative recurrence. Mean time from surgery to recurrence was 22 months (95% CI, 2.8-57.9 months). The median age of those patients was 60 years (range, 34-75 years). Most individuals were never-smokers (89%), and 83% of the patients had adenocarcinomas. Thirty patients presented with local recurrence. The distribution of local failures was as follows: ipsilateral lung (13 patients); regional lymph nodes (17 patients). Distant recurrences were identified in 56 patients. The majority of patients presented with multiple metastases. Common metastatic sites included contralateral lung (44 patients), brain (15 patients), pleura (7 patients), lymph node (5 patients), and bone (6 patients). Sixty-eight patients received therapy including radiation, metastasectomy, or chemotherapy. Fifty-seven patients had no history of TKI therapy for postoperative recurrence, and 18 patients received supportive care only.{Table 1}

Thirty four patients (40%) harbored EGFR mutations (in-frame deletions within Exon 19 [n = 28], and L858R substitutions in Exon 21 [n = 6]). The frequency of EGFR mutations was not significantly different between patients with adenocarcinomas and those with non-adenocarcinomas (39% versus 40%; P = 0.968) and between never- and ever-smokers (37% versus 56%; P = 0.272). However, the incidence of EGFR mutations was positively associated with age (51% [>60 years] versus 28% [ͳ60 years]; P = 0.027). A significant difference in the incidence of EGFR mutation according to stage (P = 0.897) and postoperative treatment (P = 0.147) was not observed.

Recurrence pattern and prognosis according to EGFR mutations

When we analyzed the association between EGFR mutations and recurrence pattern, patients with distant recurrence were more likely to have EGFR mutations than those with local recurrence [48% versus 23%; P = 0.024; [Table 2]]. Importantly, on multivariate analysis, distant recurrence was associated with a higher frequency of EGFR mutations than local recurrence [OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.1-9.4; P = 0.028; [Table 2]]. In addition, EGFR mutations were more common in old females than in young females [OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.0-7.2; P = 0.044; [Table 2]].{Table 2}

To exclude therapeutic effects, we treated the start of TKI therapy as a censoring event. Of 86 patients, 45 patients had died by July 2011. The median OS of all patients was 28.2 months (95% CI, 15.0-45.4 months). [Table 3] lists the results of univariate and multivariate analyses of OS. On univariate analysis of OS, patients with mutated EGFR had poor survival [P = 0.027; [Table 3]; [Figure 1]], as did patients with non-adenocarcinoma histology (P < 0.001). However, recurrence patterns, in addition to smoking history (P = 0.440), did not affect outcomes (P = 0.175). Outcomes of patients who received treatments, compared with those with supportive care only, were not statistically significant (data not shown). Multivariate analysis showed that mutated EGFR (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-4.4; P = 0.017) and non-adenocarcinoma histology (HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.6-6.8; P = 0.001) were associated with poor survival. When clinical outcomes were analyzed without consideration of TKI therapy, the same trends were observed for OS with respect to mutational status (HR adjusted for histology, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-9.4; P < 0.001).{Figure 1}{Table 3}

 Discussion



The aim of this study was to explore clinical features of female NSCLC at recurrence and their relationship to EGFR mutation. We found that mutated EGFR was more prevalent in distant recurrence than in local recurrence. Of interest, multivariate analysis revealed that mutated EGFR, and non-adenocarcinoma histology, were independent predictors of poor survival, when the impact of TKI therapy was excluded.

Although an association of metastatic presentation with mutational status was reported for Stage IV disease, [28] this is the first study to suggest that mutated EGFR is predominantly found in female patients with distant recurrence. This finding is in part consistent with a previous study of other solid tumors, [22] suggesting that mutational status may affect metastatic patterns in the disease process. Considering no association between EGFR mutation and stage at presentation, which was observed in a prior study, [30] a genetic abnormality might contribute to presentation at recurrence rather than to disease status at diagnosis, which was observed in a prior study on other solid tumors. [22] Theoretically, control of distant failure in EGFR-mutant patients may be a practical strategy with which to improve outcomes in resected female NSCLC patients. Thus, we believe that the results of our study are worth validation through further studies.

In our data, EGFR mutational status was not significantly associated with smoking history and adenocarcinoma histology, whereas EGFR mutation was predominant in older females, which is consistent with previous studies. [17],[19] Although statistical difference could not be reached with a limited sample size of non-adenocarcinoma and smokers, it appears that a relationship between smoking history and mutational status is not prominent in Asian female patients, [17],[31],[32] indicating their unique characteristics compared with Western patients.

Recurrence time from surgery in this cohort is within the range reported previously [32],[33] and survival outcome is consistent with other studies. [6],[32] Of interest, in this female cohort, mutated EGFR was associated with poor survival after recurrence. There are relatively few reports focusing on postoperative recurrent disease in female patients. In fact, the role of EGFR mutation could be defined differently according to clinical settings such as disease extent (early versus advanced) or delivery of TKI. [12],[19],[24],[25],[30] In addition, it should be considered that the disease process in postoperative recurrent disease may be different, as suggested in previous studies. [6],[32] Until now, the natural process of recurrence in patients with mutated EGFR has been unknown. Excluding a potential effect of TKI therapy using the method described previously, [34] we observed poorer survival in EGFR-mutated patients with recurrence. To our knowledge, there are no reports that observed different outcomes for postoperative recurrent disease according to EGFR mutation status (with the impact of TKI therapy excluded). Even when data on TKI-treated patients were excluded, a survival difference according to a mutational difference remained (adjusted HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.3-4.5; P = 0.007). Considering the effect of TKI therapy in advanced disease, it might change outcomes of patients with mutated EGFR in recurrent disease. [19],[20],[34],[35]

Several limitations, in addition to the retrospective nature of this study, need cautious interpretation. First, postoperative adjuvant treatments affect the incidence of recurrence. [36] Although a part of the population was treated using a prospective protocol, [37],[38] our results of the metastatic pattern in recurrent disease may be affected by postoperative treatments. However, postoperative treatments, including radiation and chemotherapy, were not significantly different in our cohort. Particularly, it should be considered that adjuvant chemotherapy may decrease the incidence of local recurrence as well as distant recurrence. [36] In fact, when data were confined to recurrent disease without adjuvant chemotherapy, there was a trend towards a high prevalence of EGFR mutation in those with distant recurrence, compared with wild type (58% versus 29%; P = 0.069). However, heterogeneous postoperative treatments, and a limitation due to the small number of patients in our study, means that we cannot draw a firm conclusion regarding a survival difference according to mutational status. Second, across studies, the definition of local recurrence is different. [39],[40] In our study, we regarded disease without distant metastases as local recurrence, as suggested by the Lung Cancer Study Group. [39] Third, we cannot exclude the possibility that the results of this study would be biased by the effect of histology. However, when the data on adenocarcinoma were analyzed separately, EGFR mutation remained associated with distant recurrence (79% versus 53% [wild type]; P = 0.032) as well as poor survival (adjusted HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.0-5.5; P = 0.044). Last, the prognostic role of EGFR mutation should be defined prospectively because we collected long-term survival data retrospectively. However, considering the rarity of studies on Asian female patients with postoperative recurrence, we believe that survival difference according EGFR mutations is worthy of further studies.

 Conclusion



The results of our study suggest an association between recurrence pattern and EGFR mutational status in recurrent female NSCLC patients. In addition, our data indicate unfavorable disease process in patients with mutated EGFR. However, we collected the data retrospectively, and only from one institution, and large-scale studies should be undertaken to validate these findings.

References

1Lee CT. Epidemiology of Lung Cancer in Korea. Cancer Res Treat 2002;34:3-7.
2Parkin DM. Global cancer statistics in the year 2000. Lancet Oncol 2001;2:533-43.
3Immerman SC, Vanecko RM, Fry WA, Head LR, Shields TW. Site of recurrence in patients with stages I and II carcinoma of the lung resected for cure. Ann Thorac Surg 1981;32:23-7.
4Rosell R, Gomez-Codina J, Camps C, Maestre J, Padille J, Canto A, et al. A randomized trial comparing preoperative chemotherapy plus surgery with surgery alone in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 1994;330:153-8.
5Yoshino I, Yohena T, Kitajima M, Ushijima C, Nishioka K, Ichinose Y, et al. Survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients with postoperative recurrence at distant organs. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;7:204- 9.
6Sekine I, Nokihara H, Yamamoto N, Kunitoh H, Ohe Y, Tamura T. Comparative chemotherapeutic efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with postoperative recurrence and stage IV disease. J Thorac Oncol 2009;4:518-21.
7Thomas L, Doyle LA, Edelman MJ. Lung cancer in women: Emerging differences in epidemiology, biology, and therapy. Chest 2005;128:370- 81.
8Chun BY, Yang JH, Song JH, Lim JS. Annual average cancer incidence and trend of cancer incidence in Daegu for 5 years, 1997~2001. Korean J Epidemiol 2007;29:59-69.
9Patel JD. Lung cancer in women. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:3212-8.
10Radzikowska E, Glaz P, Roszkowski K. Lung cancer in women: Age, smoking, histology, performance status, stage, initial treatment and survival. Population-based study of 20 561 cases. Ann Oncol 2002;13:1087-93.
11Minami H, Yoshimura M, Miyamoto Y, Matsuoka H, Tsubota N. Lung cancer in women: Sex-associated differences in survival of patients undergoing resection for lung cancer. Chest 2000;118:1603-9.
12Shigematsu H, Lin L, Takahashi T, Nomura M, Suzuki M, Wistuba II, et al. Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:339-46.
13Ko YC, Lee CH, Chen MJ, Huang CC, Chang WY, Lin HJ, et al. Risk factors for primary lung cancer among non-smoking women in Taiwan. Int J Epidemiol 1997;26:24-31.
14Shimizu H, Tominaga S, Nishimura M, Urata A. Comparison of clinico-epidemiological features of lung cancer patients with and without a history of smoking. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1984;14:595-600.
15Koo LC, Ho JH. Worldwide epidemiological patterns of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Int J Epidemiol 1990;19 Suppl 1:S14-23.
16Na II, Choe du H, Kim CH, Koh JS, Ryoo BY, Lee JC, et al. Age at diagnosis predicts outcomes in gefitinib-treated female patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2010;68:295-8.
17Choi YH, Lee JK, Kang HJ, Lee TS, Kim HR, Kim CH, et al. Association between age at diagnosis and the presence of EGFR mutations in female patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2010;5:1949-52.
18Sekine I, Yamamoto N, Nishio K, Saijo N. Emerging ethnic differences in lung cancer therapy. Br J Cancer 2008;99:1757-62.
19Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, Yang CH, Chu DT, Saijo N, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 2009;361:947-57.
20Tsao MS, Sakurada A, Cutz JC, Zhu CQ, Kamel-Reid S, Squire J, et al. Erlotinib in lung cancer - molecular and clinical predictors of outcome. N Engl J Med 2005;353:133-44.
21Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, Negoro S, Okamoto I, Tsurutani J, et al. Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): An open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:121-8.
22Gourley C, Michie CO, Roxburgh P, Yap TA, Harden S, Paul J, et al. Increased incidence of visceral metastases in scottish patients with BRCA1/2-defective ovarian cancer: An extension of the ovarian BRCAness phenotype. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:2505-11.
23Dent R, Hanna WM, Trudeau M, Rawlinson E, Sun P, Narod SA. Pattern of metastatic spread in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009;115:423-8.
24Mitsudomi T, Kosaka T, Endoh H, Horio Y, Hida T, Mori S, et al. Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene predict prolonged survival after gefitinib treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with postoperative recurrence. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2513-20.
25Kim ST, Choi YJ, Park KH, Oh SC, Seo JH, Shin SW, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations as a prognostic factor in Korean patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who had not been treated with received epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Chemotherapy 2011;57:108-14.
26Martini N, Melamed MR. Multiple primary lung cancers. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1975;70:606-12.
27Na II, Kang HJ, Cho SY, Koh JS, Lee JK, Lee BC, et al. EGFR mutations and human papillomavirus in squamous cell carcinoma of tongue and tonsil. Eur J Cancer 2007;43:520-6.
28Na II, Park JH, Choe DH, Lee JK, Koh JS. Association of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations with Metastatic Presentation in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. ISRN Oncol 2011;2011:756265.
29Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc B 1972;44:793- 7.
30Kosaka T, Yatabe Y, Endoh H, Kuwano H, Takahashi T, Mitsudomi T. Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in lung cancer: Biological and clinical implications. Cancer Res 2004;64:8919-23.
31Hotta K, Kiura K, Takigawa N, Kuyama S, Segawa Y, Yonei T, et al. Sex difference in the influence of smoking status on the responsiveness to gefitinib monotherapy in adenocarcinoma of the lung: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group experience. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2009;135:117-23.
32Yamazaki K, Sugio K, Yamanaka T, Hirai F, Osoegawa A, Tagawa T, et al. Prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer patients with postoperative recurrence following third-generation chemotherapy. Anticancer Res 2010;30:1311-5.
33Boyd JA, Hubbs JL, Kim DW, Hollis D, Marks LB, Kelsey CR. Timing of local and distant failure in resected lung cancer: Implications for reported rates of local failure. J Thorac Oncol 2010;5:211-4.
34Takano T, Fukui T, Ohe Y, Tsuta K, Yamamoto S, Nokihara H, et al. EGFR mutations predict survival benefit from gefitinib in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma: A historical comparison of patients treated before and after gefitinib approval in Japan. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:5589-95.
35Katayama T, Matsuo K, Kosaka T, Sueda T, Yatabe Y, Mitsudomi T. Effect of gefitinib on the survival of patients with recurrence of lung adenocarcinoma after surgery: A retrospective case-matching cohort study. Surg Oncol 2010;19:e144-9.
36Dunant A, Pignon JP, Le Chevalier T. Adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Contribution of the International Adjuvant Lung Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:5017s-21s.
37Park JH, Lee CT, Lee HW, Baek HJ, Zo JI, Shim YM. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:1086-91.
38Park JH, Shim YM, Baek HJ, Kim MS, Choe DH, Cho KJ, et al. Postoperative adjuvant therapy for stage II non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1821-6.
39Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:615-22;discussion 22-3.
40Kelsey CR, Marks LB, Hollis D, Hubbs JL, Ready NE, D'Amico TA, et al. Local recurrence after surgery for early stage lung cancer: An 11-year experience with 975 patients. Cancer 2009;115:5218-27.