Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 7  |  Page : 2033-2040

Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells expressing BMP2 suppress glioma stem cell growth and stemness through Bcl-2/Bax signaling


1 Department of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
2 Department of Pathology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
3 Department of Neurosurgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China

Date of Submission03-Nov-2021
Date of Decision14-Sep-2022
Date of Acceptance23-Sep-2022
Date of Web Publication11-Jan-2023

Correspondence Address:
Jiamei Li
Department of Pathology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, No. 324 Jingwu Road, Jinan Shandong - 250 021
China
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1983_21

Rights and Permissions
 > Abstract 


Objectives: To find an effective molecule that controls glioma stem cell (GSC) proliferation and differentiation for the development of future therapeutic interventions against glioblastoma.
Material and Methods: Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were infected with a lentiviral vector to express BMP2. Cell viability, cell counting, and tumor sphere formation assays, as well as flow cytometry, immunofluorescence staining, and Western blotting were used to investigate the effects of BMSC-BMP2 on GSCs.
Results: The results of flow cytometry and the CKK-8 assay showed that BMSC-BMP2 induced GSC apoptosis while inhibiting proliferation. BMSC-BMP2 decreased GSC neurosphere formation and neurospheres' transverse and vertical diameter. Meanwhile, BMSC-BMP2 downregulated GSC Nanog and OCT4 expression levels, suggesting stemness inhibition. Western blotting showed that BMSC-BMP2 increased Bax protein expression and significantly decreased Bcl-2 protein expression. Accordingly, the Bcl-2/Bax ratio increased.
Conclusion: BMSC-BMP2 could effectively inhibit GSC proliferation, induce GSC apoptosis, and decrease GSC stemness, thereby providing a novel strategy for treating malignant glioma.

Keywords: Apoptosis, Bcl-2/Bax ratio, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, bone morphogenetic proteins 2, glioma stem cells, glioma, proliferation


How to cite this article:
Feng J, Yao Z, Yang H, Ma J, Zhong X, Qin Y, Li J. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells expressing BMP2 suppress glioma stem cell growth and stemness through Bcl-2/Bax signaling. J Can Res Ther 2022;18:2033-40

How to cite this URL:
Feng J, Yao Z, Yang H, Ma J, Zhong X, Qin Y, Li J. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells expressing BMP2 suppress glioma stem cell growth and stemness through Bcl-2/Bax signaling. J Can Res Ther [serial online] 2022 [cited 2023 Jan 27];18:2033-40. Available from: https://www.cancerjournal.net/text.asp?2022/18/7/2033/367467




 > Introduction Top


Malignant glioma is the most common and aggressive brain tumor, as there are limited therapeutic options. Available treatments, including surgical excision, radiation, and chemotherapy, do not improve the prognosis of malignant glioma.[1] The median survival of patients with high-grade glioma is <14 months,[2],[3] and the 5-year survival rate of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) <3%.[4]

Recently, it was reported that gliomas include glioma stem cells (GSCs) with unlimited self-renewal capacity and potent tumorigenicity.[5] These cells are resistant to various chemotherapeutic agents.[6] Therefore, strategies targeting GSCs or restraining their invasive capacity might provide effective therapies. Recent studies have shown that GSCs can be induced to differentiate into mature glial cells, thus eliminating GSCs.[7] Accordingly, we attempted to find an effective molecule to regulate GSC proliferation and differentiation with potential for GBM treatment.

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are a family of cytokines with extensive biological activity. BMPs have been found to play an important role in nervous system development, regulating neural stem cell (NSC) proliferation and differentiation.[8] In vitro, BMP2 is an important switch for transforming neural progenitor cells to glial cells, changing the direction of NSC differentiation toward astrocytes. Further, BMP2 can inhibit brain tumor stem cell proliferation and glioma growth, prolonging survival in mice.[9] In a mouse model of transplanted tumors, simvastatin-induced BMP2 expression promoted differentiation of colorectal CSCs, inhibiting metastasis.[10]

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been suggested as a promising cell population for cell-based therapeutic strategies.[11] MSCs have the intrinsic capability to migrate to solid tumor tissues and have been used to deliver anti-cancer agents. This method reduces systemic adverse effects and promotes effective local anti-tumor activity.[12],[13],[14] In addition, MSCs' immune modulatory capacity is crucial in anti-tumoral strategies.[15],[16],[17],[18],[19] We have previously used bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMSCs) as a safe alternative for clinical intervention in patients with central nervous system (CNS) disorders.[20] In the present study, we used BMSCs as a vehicle for delivering BMP2 to GBM as a novel and effective means of eliminating GSCs. Our results show that BMP2-BMSC carriers (BMSC-BMP2) can inhibit GSC proliferation, stemness, and induce GSC apoptosis.


 > Material and Methods Top


BMSC isolation and expansion

We used 3-week-old Wistar rats for all experiments. Rat bone marrow aspirates were selected by the plastic adherence method.[21] The cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2. Flow cytometry was used to analyze the expression of MSC surface markers. MSC phenotypic markers, namely CD29, CD90, and CD45 (all from Becton Dickinson Biosciences, USA), were used to confirm the stem cell-like features of the isolated stromal cells. The cells were subsequently expanded through several passages; we used passage four cells for further experiments. The approval from the ethics committee has been obtained before. The data of the approval is March 3, 2015. The number is CN0.2015-019.

Vector construction and cell transduction

BMSCs were infected with a lentiviral vector constructed to express BMP2. The lentivirus was constructed according to manufacturer's instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). A human complementary DNA (cDNA) BMP2 fragment was directionally cloned into the pDC316 plasmid, which was subsequently recombined with the pLenti6.3 vector. Then, the pLenti6.3-BMP2 plasmid was transfected with pLP1, pLP2, and pLP/VSVG plasmids into BMSCs. After 48 h, the virus was harvested from the culture medium and filtered. Lentivirus with the BMP2 sequence was obtained according to manufacturer's instructions and used to infect BMSCs (multiplicity of infection = 10 virus particles/mL) and selected after 2 weeks using G418. Transfection was accomplished using Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).

BMSC-BMP2 proliferation was detected by a cell cycle assay, and BMSCs' differentiation ability was detected by a BMSC adipogenic differentiation kit.

GSC isolation and expansion

Human glioma U251 cells were inoculated in NSC medium containing DMEM/F12 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), leukemia inhibitory factor (10 ng/mL), B27 (1×, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), recombinant murine epidermal growth factor (20 ng/mL, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and basic fibroblast growth factor (20 ng/mL, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. Half of the medium was replaced once every 3–4 days. Neurospheres were collected after they had grown in numerous proliferations and digested by 0.25% trypsin for 2 min; digestion was terminated using 10% FBS. The cell suspension was filtered through a 200-mesh sieve and centrifuged at 1000 rpm. After disposing of the supernatant, the primary GSCs were washed again with serum-free medium. Then, CD133+ cells were separated according to the instructions of a CD133 cell isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec, USA), and collected and inoculated into the NSC medium.

Apoptosis assay

The apoptosis rate was calculated by flow cytometry. Experiments were randomly divided into control (normal saline), negative control (NC), and low- (0.5 × 104 cells) and high-dose (1 × 104 cells) BMSC-BMP2 groups. After collection, cells were rinsed and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Then, the cells were stained using an annexin V–FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate)/PI (propidium iodide) Apoptosis Detection Kit (BD Biosciences, USA) as per manufacturer's instructions. FACS Calibur was used to determine the apoptosis rate of the stained cells; data were measured by FACS Diva software. The experiments were repeated three times.

Cell counting kit-8 assay

Cell proliferation was examined using the cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) and cell cycle assays. GSCs were plated in 96-well plates at approximately 1 × 106 cells per well and co-cultured with normal saline, BMSC-NC, or low- and high-dose BMSC-BMP2 for 48 and 72 h. Then, the inhibitory effect of BMSC-BMP2 on GSCs was confirmed using the CCK-8 assay. A CCK-8 reagent was added to the cells and incubated for 2 h. Next, the optical density at 450 nm was measured by a microplate reader according to manufacturer's instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). All results correspond to the means of three experiments, each performed in triplicate.

Quantitative real-time PCR

RNA was isolated from cells using an RNA extraction kit. cDNA was synthesized using a SuperScript RNAse Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, USA). Quantitative real-time PCR was run in triplicate using SYBR Green master mix (Toyobo, Japan). Fluorescence emission was recorded in real time (Applied Biosystems, CA). Beta-actin was used as endogenous control gene to normalize mRNA expression. The relative mRNA expression was calculated by the comparative threshold cycle (2-ΔΔCt) method.

Immunofluorescent staining

BMSC-BMP2-treated GSCs were washed three times with ice-cold PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde-PBS. After a 15-min incubation with 0.1% Triton-PBS, the cells were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin-PBS. Then, the GSC spheres were incubated with antibodies against CD133, Nanog, and OCT4 (all from Abcam, UK). The samples were incubated with the primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. After a PBS wash, cells were incubated with goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 594 for 1 h at 37°C. The nuclei were stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 30 min. Images were obtained with a confocal microscopy system.

Western blotting

Total protein was extracted using a NP-40 lysis buffer supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant was collected for further use. Protein lysates (40 mg) were resolved on 4–20% denaturing sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). The membranes were probed with the following antibodies: mouse anti-CD133, anti-Nanog, anti-OCT4, anti-Bax, and anti-Bcl-2 (all from Abcam, UK). Then, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody was added for 1 h at room temperature and the blot visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescent reagent kit (GE Healthcare, USA).

Neurosphere formation assay

Sphere-forming GSCs were dissociated into single-cell suspensions. The cells were diluted to 1000–5000 cells/mL, and 100 μL of cell solution was added to each well of a 96-well plate. The cells were allowed to grow for 6–8 days; 50 μL fresh medium was added at day 3 or 4. Then, the number and diameter of neurospheres in each well were detected under a microscope.

Statistical analyses

The values are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Each experiment was repeated ≥3 times and analyzed by Student's t-test or two-way analysis of variance. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.


 > Results Top


BMSC isolation and characterization

The BMSCs used in this study were positive for surface antigens CD29 and CD90, and negative for CD45, displaying the capacity for differentiation into adipocytes (data not shown).

BMSC-BMP2 proliferation and differentiation

There was an increased frequency of BMSC-BMP2 cells in the G2/M phase and a decreased frequency of cells in the S phase [p < 0.05, [Figure 1]a]. The proliferation index of BMSC-BMP2 increased [p < 0.05, [Figure 1]b] compared to the control and NC groups. The effect of transduction on BMSC-BMP2 differentiation was detected using a BMSC adipogenic differentiation kit. Oil Red O staining demonstrated numerous intracellular lipid droplets in the BMSC-BMP2 after 2 weeks of culture [Figure 1]c and [Figure 1]d.
Figure 1: Characterization of BMSCs overexpressing BMP2. (a) BMSCs-BMP2 cell cycle showing increased frequency of cells in the G2/M phase and decreased frequency of cells in the S phase compared to BMSCs. (b) Upregulation of BMSC-BMP2's proliferation index. (c and d) Numerous intracellular lipid droplets in BMSCs-BMP2. BMSCs = bone marrow-derived MSCs, BMP2 = bone morphogenetic proteins 2, Con = Control group, NC = Negative control group, BMP2-OE = BMSC-BMP2 group. *p < 0.05

Click here to view


GSC isolation and characterization

Stem-like cells derived from U251 cells were cultured in NSC medium. The cells grew together and formed cell spheres after 3–5 days [Figure 2]a. The cells in the spheres were CD133-positive [Figure 2]b and expressed CD133 protein [Figure 2]c and [Figure 2]d. Next, stem-like cell spheres were cultured in DMEM/F12 plus 10% FBS medium. After three days, stem-like cell spheres adhered to the bottom of the well; thick dendrite-like pseudopodia grew after one week and showed typical morphological differentiation toward astrocytic lineages, identified as they were positive for glial fibrillary acid protein (data not shown).
Figure 2: GSC characterization. (a) GSC spheres from U251 cells. (b) Immunofluorescent staining showing CD133-positive GSC spheres. (c) Western blot showing higher CD133 protein expression in GSC spheres than in U251 cells. (d) Relative CD133 protein expression in GSC spheres and U251 cells. GSC = glioma stem cell. *p < 0.05

Click here to view


BMSC-BMP2-induced GSC apoptosis and inhibited GSC proliferation

To determine whether BMSCs-BMP2 induce GSC apoptosis, U251 GSCs were analyzed by flow cytometry. The apoptotic rate of GSCs increased significantly from 5.84% to 7.06% after 48 h of treatment with low-dose BMSC-BMP2 and from 6.97% to 20.47% after 72 h. Furthermore, 48 and 72 h treatment with high-dose BMSC-BMP2 significantly increased the GSC apoptosis rate from 5.84% to 8.64% and from 6.97% to 24.57%, respectively [Figure 3]a and [Figure 3]b.
Figure 3: BMSC-BMP2 induces GSC apoptosis and inhibited GSC proliferation. (a and b) Cell apoptosis in the BMSC-BMP2 group compared to the control and NC group. (c) BMSC-BMP2 decreases GSC viability. BMSCs = bone marrow-derived MSCs, BMP2 = bone morphogenetic proteins 2, GSC = glioma stem cell, Con = Control group, NC = Negative control group, Low = Low-dose BMSC-BMP2 group, High = High-dose BMSC-BMP2 group. *p < 0.05

Click here to view


To determine whether BMSCs-BMP2 had inhibitory effects on GSC proliferation, GSCs were co-cultured with low- and high-dose BMSC-BMP2 for 48 and 72 h, and cell activity was detected using CCK-8. Treated GSCs exhibited reduced proliferation levels in response to BMSC-BMP2 in a dose-dependent manner. There was a significant shift in the proliferation inhibition curve of BMSC-BMP2 groups compared with the control and NC groups [Figure 3]c.

BMSC-BMP2 inhibited neurosphere formation

We investigated if BMSCs-BMP2 would inhibit neurosphere formation. The number of neurospheres decreased significantly from 131.33 (control group) and 110 (NC group) to 43 and 24 after a 72 h treatment with low- and high-dose BMSC-BMP2, respectively; moreover, there was an obvious decrease in neurosphere size. The transverse and vertical diameter of neurospheres were 72.45 μm and 61.97 μm in the control group, 72.45 μm and 61.97 μm in the BMSC-NC group, 52.02 μm and 54.43 μm in the low-dose BMSC-BMP2 group, and 58.42 μm and 50.98 μm in the high-dose BMSC-BMP2 group, respectively [Figure 4]. Accordingly, BMSCs-BMP2 inhibit GSC neurosphere formation.
Figure 4: BMSC-BMP2 inhibits GSC neurosphere formation. The number of GSC neurospheres decreased significantly, as did their TD and VD. BMSCs = bone marrow-derived MSCs, BMP2 = bone morphogenetic proteins 2, GSC = glioma stem cell, Con = Control group, NC = Negative control group, Low = Low-dose BMSC-BMP2 group, High = High-dose BMSC-BMP2 group, TD = transverse diameter, VD = vertical diameter. *p < 0.05

Click here to view


BMSC-BMP2 decreased GSC stemness

We explored whether BMSC-BMP2 regulate GSC stemness. To that end, we investigated the levels of OCT4 and Nanog, two stemness markers. Immunofluorescence staining and Western blotting showed lower Nanog [Figure 5]a, [Figure 5]b, [Figure 5]c, [Figure 5]d, [Figure 5]i and [Figure 5]j and OCT 4 [Figure 5]e, [Figure 5]f, [Figure 5]g, [Figure 5]h, [Figure 5]i and [Figure 5]k expression levels in the BMSC-BMP2 groups compared to the control and NC groups (p < 0.05). These data suggest that BMSC-BMP2 affects GSC proliferation and stemness.
Figure 5: BMSC-BMP2 decreased expression of the GSC stem cell markers Nanog and OCT4. Immunofluorescent staining showing strong and diffuse Nanog and OCT4 expression in the control (a and e) and NC groups (b and f). GSCs treated with low- (c and g) and high-dose (d and h) BMSC-BMP2 showing low Nanog and OCT4 expression levels, respectively. (i) Nanog and OCT4 expression levels by Western blotting. (j and k) Relative Nanog and OCT4 expression. BMSCs = Bone marrow-derived MSCs, BMP2 = Bone morphogenetic proteins 2, GSC = Glioma stem cell, Con = Control group, NC = Negative control group, Low = Low-dose BMSC-BMP2 group, High = High-dose BMSC-BMP2 group. *p < 0.05

Click here to view


Bax and Bcl-2 expression

After a 72 h treatment with low- and high-dose BMSC-BMP2, Bax and Bcl-2 protein expression in GSC sphere cells was detected by Western blotting. As shown in [Figure 6], Bax expression was significantly upregulated in BMSC-BMP2 groups (p < 0.01); however, Bcl-2 protein expression was significantly downregulated (p < 0.01). Accordingly, the Bcl-2/Bax ratio significantly increased (p < 0.01).
Figure 6: Bax and Bcl 2 protein expression. (a and b) BMSC BMP2 decreases Bcl 2 protein expression. (a and c) BMSC BMP2 increases Bax protein expression. (d) significantly increased Bcl-2/Bax ratio. BMSCs = Bone marrow-derived MSCs, BMP2 = Bone morphogenetic proteins 2, Con = Control group, NC = Negative control group, Low = Low-dose BMSC-BMP2 group, High = High-dose BMSC-BMP2 group. *p < 0.05

Click here to view



 > Discussion Top


In the present study, we attempted to explore a new practical clinical application against GSCs. BMP2 can sensitize GSCs to temozolomide by affecting hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α) stability and MGMT expression.[22] Valproic acid-induced BMP2 mRNA expression induces apoptosis in glioma-initiating cells.[23] However, the delivery pathway restricts the inhibitory effects of BMP2 on glioma cells. Since BMP2 cannot cross the blood–brain barrier when administered intravenously, and direct intracerebral injection cannot achieve long-term efficacy, we used BMSCs as a vehicle for delivering BMP2 as a novel and effective means of eliminating GSCs. First, we observed the effect of the transfection on BMSC proliferation and stemness. BMP2-transfected BMSCs could differentiate into adipocytes. Moreover, BMP2 increased BMSC proliferation and self-renewal but not BMSC stemness.

Sustained proliferative signaling and resistance to apoptosis are two hallmarks of cancer. In the present study, BMSC-BMP2-treated GSCs underwent G0/G1 arrest and showed inhibited proliferation and decreased stemness; BMSC-BMP2 also induced GSC apoptosis. Morphologically, there was an obvious decrease in the number and size of gliospheres formed in vitro. Accordingly, BMSC-BMP2 can inhibit GSC growth by inhibiting cell proliferation and promoting apoptosis.

Differentiation status significantly affects the properties of malignant glioma cells; non-stem cells induce tumor enlargement and stem-like cells drive tumor initiation and treatment resistance to reduce GSC stemness. Triggering GSC differentiation reduces their tumor-propagating potential[7] while reprogramming GSCs to induced pluripotent stem cells alters their capacity to propagate tumors.[24] In the present study, stem cell markers were detected to observe the differentiation status of BMSC-BMP2-treated GSCs. Here, BMSC-BMP2-treated GSCs showed significantly decreased Nanog and OCT4 expression. Taken together, our data demonstrate that BMSC-BMP2 can effectively attenuate GSC-related pluripotency gene expression and reduce cancer stemness, greatly enhancing the GSC targeting effect.

Moreover, we detected significant Bax upregulation in the BMSC-BMP2 groups; however, Bcl-2 was downregulated. BMSCs-BMP2 inhibited cell cycle progression in the G2/M phase and induced apoptosis by regulating the Bcl-2/Bax signaling pathways in vitro. Combined with the neurosphere number and size and the formation of in vitro colonies, our results show that BMSC-BMP2 exhibited robust GSC-eliminating properties by regulating Bcl-2/Bax signaling in vitro. Cell proliferation and apoptosis analyses showed the increased anti-cancer effects of BMSC-BMP2 on GSCs in vitro.

Our study investigated the potential of BMSC-based therapy for glioma treatment. The results demonstrate the outstanding performance of BMSC-BMP2 in inhibiting GSC proliferation, inducing GSC apoptosis, and decreasing GSC stemness. BMSC-mediated BMP2 may be a promising alternative for treating GMB.

Financial support and sponsorship

The present research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81502568) and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2019BH063).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
 > References Top

1.
Chandrasekar G, Bansal VS, Panigrahi M, Kitambi SS. An overview of targets and therapies for glioblastoma multiforme. J Cancer Res Ther 2022;18:591-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Qi L, Ding L, Wang S, Zhong Y, Zhao D, Gao L, et al. A network meta-analysis: The overall and progression-free survival of glioma patients treated by different chemotherapeutic interventions combined with radiation therapy (RT). Oncotarget 2016;7:69002-13.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Magge RS, Barbaro M, Fine HA. Innovations in Neuro-Oncology. World Neurosurg 2021;151:386-91.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Saito T, Sugiyama K, Takeshima Y, Amatya VJ, Yamasaki F, Takayasu T, et al. Prognostic implications of the subcellular localization of survivin in glioblastomas treated with radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. J Neurosurg 2018;128:679-84.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Pan Y, Ma S, Cao K, Zhou S, Zhao A, Li M, et al. Therapeutic approaches targeting cancer stem cells. J Cancer Res Ther 2018;14:1469-75.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Yelle N, Bakhshinyan D, Venugopal C, Singh SK. Introduction to brain tumor stem cells. Methods Mol Biol 2019;1869:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Chen J, Li Y, Yu TS, McKay RM, Burns DK, Kernie SG, et al. A restricted cell population propagates glioblastoma growth after chemotherapy. Nature 2012;488:522-26.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Ahmed AKMA, Nakagawa H, Isaksen TJ, Yamashita T. The effects of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4 on adult neural stem cell proliferation, differentiation and survival in an in vitro model of ischemic stroke. Neurosci Res 2022;183:17-29.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Piccirillo SG, Reynolds BA, Zanetti N, Lamorte G, Binda E, et al. Bone morphogenetic proteins inhibit the tumorigenic potential of human brain tumor-initiating cells. Nature 2006;444:761-65.9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Kodach LL, Jacobs RJ, Voorneveld PW, Wildenberg ME, Verspaget HW, van Wezel T, et al. Statins augment the chemosensitivity of colorectal cancer cells inducing epigenetic reprogramming and reducing colorectal cancer cell 'stemness' via the bone morphogenetic protein pathway. Gut 2011;60:1544-53.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
van Velthoven CT, Braccioli L, Willemen HL, Kavelaars A, Heijnen CJ. Therapeutic potential of genetically modified mesenchymal stem cells after neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain damage. Mol Ther 2014;22:645-54.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Shah K. Mesenchymal stem cells engineered for cancer therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2012;64:739-48.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Uchibori R, Tsukahara T, Ohmine K, Ozawa K. Cancer gene therapy using mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Hematol 2014;99:377-82.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Willmon C, Harrington K, Kottke T, Prestwich R, Melcher A, Vile R. Cell carriers for oncolytic viruses: Fed Ex for cancer therapy. Mol Ther 2009;17:1667-76.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Ahmed AU, Rolle CE, Tyler MA, Han Y, Sengupta S, Wainwright DA, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells loaded with an oncolytic adenovirus suppress the anti-adenoviral immune response in the cotton rat model. Mol Ther 2010;18:1846-56.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Gebler A, Zabel O, Seliger B. The immunomodulatory capacity of mesenchymal stem cells. Trends Mol Med 2012;18:128-34.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Melen GJ, Franco-Luzon L, Ruano D, Gonzalez-Murillo A, Alfranca A, Casco F, et al. Influence of carrier cells on the clinical outcome of children with neuroblastomatreated with high dose of oncolytic adenovirus delivered in mesenchymal stem cells. Cancer Lett 2016;371:161-70.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Miloradovic D, Miloradovic D, Markovic BS, Acovic A, Harrell CR, Djonov V, et al. The effects of mesenchymal stem cells on antimelanoma immunity depend on the timing of their administration. Stem Cells Int 2020;8842659.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Farahmand L, Esmaeili R, Eini L, Majidzadeh-A K. The effect of mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned medium on proliferation and apoptosis of breast cancer cell line. J Cancer Res Ther 2018;14:341-4.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Li JM, Zhu H, Chen YX, Deng W, Li Q, Lu S, et al. The distribution of transplanted human mesenchymal stem cells in the CNS of young Macaca fascicularis. Brain Res 2014;1579:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Maridas DE, Rendina-Ruedy E, Le PT, Rosen CJ. Isolation, culture, and differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells and osteoclast progenitors from mice. J Vis Exp 2018;6:56750.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Persano L, Pistollato F, Rampazzo E, Della Puppa A, Abbadi S, Frasson C, et al. BMP2 sensitizes glioblastoma stem-like cells to Temozolomide by affecting HIF-1α stability and MGMT expression. Cell Death Dis 2012;18:e412.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Raja E, Komuro A, Tanabe R, Sakai S, Ino Y, Saito N, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein signaling mediated by ALK-2 and DLX2 regulates apoptosis in glioma-initiating cells. Oncogene 2017;36:4963-74.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Liau BB, Sievers C, Donohue LK, Gillespie SM, Flavahan WA, Miller TE, et al. Adaptive chromatin remodeling drives glioblastoma stem cell plasticity and drug tolerance. Cell Stem Cell 2017;20:233-46.e7.  Back to cited text no. 24
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  >Abstract>Introduction>Material and Methods>Results>Discussion>Article Figures
  In this article
>References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed350    
    Printed14    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded33    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]