Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 8  |  Page : 128-132

Is there any relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in gastric cancer?

1 Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey
2 Department of Medical Oncology, Sakarya Education and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey
3 Department of Pathology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Isparta, Turkey
4 Department of Medical Oncology, Suleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Medicine, Isparta, Turkey
5 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

Date of Submission26-Dec-2018
Date of Acceptance09-Jun-2019
Date of Web Publication22-Oct-2019

Correspondence Address:
Efnan Algin
Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara 06490
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_891_18

Rights and Permissions
 > Abstract 

Purpose: Helicobacter pylori(HP) is a significant causative agent of gastric cancer (GC). However, the underlying mechanisms involved in its pathogenesis and association with oncoproteins are unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between HP infection and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression in GC patients.
Materials and Methods: Surgery (173) or endoscopic biopsy (35) specimen of 208 patients diagnosed with GC was evaluated for the presence of HER2 and HP. HER2 expression was assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method, whereas HP status was evaluated histologically. Giemsa stain was used to identify HP status, in case HP could not be recognized in routine H and E-stained sections despite careful examination
Results: The median age was 63 years (27–91), and most patients were male (male/female: 149/59). Of all the 208 patients, HP was positive in 87 (41.8%) and negative in 121 (58.2%) patients. FISH positivity for HER2 was observed in 41 (19.7%) patients, whereas FISH negativity was observed in 167 (80.3%) patients. According to the Chi-square test, patient distribution was 21 in HER2-positive HP-negative group, 20 in HER2-positive HP-positive group, 100 in HER2-negative HP-negative group, and 67 in HER2-negative HP-positive group. No correlation was found between HP and HER2 status (P = 0.314). HP positivity had significant effect on median overall survival (27.4 vs. 12.9 months, P = 0.046).
Conclusions: Our results suggest that there is no relationship between HP infection and HER2 status in patients with GC.

Keywords: Fluorescence in situ hybridization, gastric cancer, Giemsa, Helicobacter pylori, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

How to cite this article:
Algin E, Baykara M, Yilmaz G, Cetin B, Ekinci O, Uner A, Ozet A. Is there any relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in gastric cancer?. J Can Res Ther 2020;16, Suppl S1:128-32

How to cite this URL:
Algin E, Baykara M, Yilmaz G, Cetin B, Ekinci O, Uner A, Ozet A. Is there any relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in gastric cancer?. J Can Res Ther [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 21];16:128-32. Available from: https://www.cancerjournal.net/text.asp?2020/16/8/128/269750

 > Introduction Top

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common cancers. Despite the addition of targeted novel agents to cytotoxic chemotherapy, GC remains the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality.[1] Among these, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is the most popular target of investigation. HER2 is a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor and a member of the human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family. HER2 has an important role in the regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation and other activities associated with cell survival.[2],[3] The rate of HER2 overexpression in GC varies widely between 2% and 45%.[4],[5],[6],[7],[8]

Helicobacter pylori (HP) is a Gram-negative bacterium that colonizes the gastric mucosa. In 1994, it has been accepted as a carcinogen by the World Health Organization in the development of GC.[9] It has been demonstrated that HP induces the transcription of multiple host genes.[10] However, little is known about the underlying molecular mechanisms of HP-related tumor development and its association with oncoproteins. Although it has been reported that EGF and EGFR levels increased by HP infection and decreased after eradication, there are conflicting results about the relationship between HP infection and HER2 expression.[11],[12] The limited number of studies suggested that there was no correlation between HP and HER2 in GC patients, whereas Shim et al. reported that HP may induce HER2 overexpression.[13],[14],[15],[16],[17]

As is known, the ToGA trial reported improved overall survival (OS) with the addition of trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the HER2 protein, to standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced-stage HER2-positive GC.[18] Based on the results of this study, testing HER2 status is important to establish treatment strategy in these patients. Defining a biomarker for HER2 amplification and overexpression will be quite exciting. In this context, the present study aimed to investigate the relationship between HP infection and HER2 expression in patients diagnosed with GC. In addition, the association of HP infection with the clinical and pathological parameters and its impact on prognosis were evaluated.

 > Materials and Methods Top


Between years 2004 and 2013, 208 patients with GC who were treated at the Department of Medical Oncology, Gazi University School of Medicine, were retrospectively reviewed. Samples of all patients were obtained from surgical or endoscopic biopsy materials. Two experienced pathologists assessed the presence of HER2 expression using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method on adequate tissue samples from the patients, whereas HP status was evaluated histologically. The impact of HP infection on clinical and histopathological characteristics and survival was evaluated.

Helicobacter pylori assessment method

Routine formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded 173 surgical and 35 endoscopic biopsy specimens from 208 GC patients were reviewed for HP assessment. In the first place, standard H and E-stained gastric tissue sections were evaluated in line with the literature.[19] Of all the 208 patients, 72 were positive for HP, whereas the remaining 136 patients were negative. The histological sections of these 136 HP-negative patients were stained with Giemsa to re-identify HP status. Among them, 15 patients were positive for HP with Giemsa stain. As a result of Giemsa stain, 87 patients were positive for HP and the remaining 121 were negative [Figure 1]a, [Figure 1]b, [Figure 1]c.
Figure 1: Poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma with signet ring features (H and E, ×200) (a) Helicobacter pylori gastritis on the neighboring surface epithelium (H and E, ×400) (b) A group of Helicobacter pylori within the surface mucin of antral mucosa (Giemsa stain, ×2000) (c)

Click here to view

Fluorescence in situ hybridization method

Six-μm-thickness sections were obtained from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples and mounted on SuperFrost™ +/+ slides. After deparaffinizing, protease digestion procedures were performed following the ABBOTT/Vysis PathVysion HER-2 DNA Probe Kit protocol (PathVysion CE Package Insert, Revision I, 2002), with additional monitoring of the progress of proteinase digestion by propidium iodide staining. After the hybridization of probe mixes at 37°C between 14 and 18 h, the slides were washed in × 2 saline-sodium citrate (SSC)/0.3% NP-40 at 72°C for 30 min, air-dried, and counterstained with diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). A minimum of twenty nuclei of invasive tumor cells were scored by epifluorescence microscopes equipped with × 100 oil immersion objective and DAPI/Spectrum Green/Orange single and triple band-pass filters (AHF). The HER2 signals and the chromosome 17 signals were counted in at least twenty cells. Samples with a HER2/CEP 17 rate ≥ 2 were considered HER2 positive.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 21.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Chi-square test was used to assess the correlation between HP infection and other parameters. Survival rates were calculated by using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. OS was identified as the interval between the date of diagnosis and the date of death due to any reason or last visit. The impact of HP infection on survival was evaluated by log-rank test. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant for statistical analysis.

 > Results Top

The median age of the 208 patients included in the study was 63 years (27–91), and most patients were male (male/female: 149/59). Histopathologic diagnosis was adenocarcinoma in 117 (56.2%) patients, signet ring cell adenocarcinoma in 51 (24.6%), and mixed adenocarcinoma-signet ring cell adenocarcinoma in 40 patients (19.2%). Of all the 208 patients, HP was positive in 87 (41.8%) and negative in 121 (58.2%) patients according to the results of histopathologic examination. FISH positivity for HER2 was observed in 41 (19.7%) patients, whereas FISH negativity was observed in 167 (80.3%) patients.

Pearson's Chi-square test was performed to identify the association between HP and HER2 status. In total, 21 of the 121 (17.4%) HP-negative patients were HER 2 positive and 100 (82.6%) patients were HER2 negative, whereas 20 of the 87 (23%) HP-positive patients were HER2 positive and 67 (77%) were HER2 negative. There was no correlation between HP and HER2 status (P = 0.314). In addition, there was no relationship between HP status and age, gender, histopathologic diagnosis, tumor location, tumor-node-metastasis stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, grade, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and Lauren classification. The general patient characteristics and the relationship between these features and HP status are summarized in [Table 1].
Table 1: General patient characteristics and comparisons of these features according to helicobacter pylori status

Click here to view

The median OS of the entire population was 14.8 months (0.07–82.5). The median OS was 12.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.7–18.0) in the HP-negative group and 27.4 months (95% CI: 16.4–38.4) in the HP-positive group, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.046). Survival curves for HP-positive and HP-negative patients are shown in [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Kaplan–Meier curve for overall survival according to Helicobacter pylori status

Click here to view

 > Discussion Top

HP has been determined as an etiologic factor of GC development. In the study by Forman,[20] HP antibody was defined in 69% of GC cases, whereas Parsonnet et al.[21] and Nomura et al.[22] reported the concomitance rate of HP and GC to be 84% and 94%, respectively. It is shown that HP increases mucosal cellular proliferation. Nucleolar organizer regions and proliferated cellular nuclear antigen are defined as cellular proliferation markers in the HP-infected mucosa. After HP eradication, these proliferation markers as well as p53 immunoreactivity and EGFR levels return to normal values.[11],[23],[24]

Although it is well known that HP infection is a significant causative agent of GC, the underlying mechanisms involved in its pathogenesis remain unclear. The spectrum of genetic alterations in neoplasms may serve clues to the molecular carcinogenesis of HP. For this purpose, the relationship between HP infection and several oncoproteins has been investigated for a long time. Coyle et al.[11] reported that HP plays a major role in EGFR expression, and HP eradication reduces EGF and EGFR levels in gastric mucosal cells. This expression results in HER2 oncogene activities which can lead to GC development.

There are only a limited number of studies investigating the relationship between HP infection and HER2 status. In these studies, no correlation was found between these parameters.[13],[14],[15],[16] In contrast to the literature, Shim et al.[17] found that HER2 overexpression was closely related to HP cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA) positivity, a bacterial virulence factor, and they concluded that CagA-positive HP may induce HER2 overexpression by increasing HER2 DNA and mRNA copy number. In our study, the largest series in this field to date, we could not find any correlation between HP infection and HER2 status, which is consistent with the majority of literatures. The reason for these conflicting results may be based on HER2 testing methods. Because of the heterogeneous tumor cell distribution in GC, unlike breast cancer, immunohistochemical staining for HER2 expression status can result in false positivities or negativities.[25],[26] Another technique to evaluate HER2 status is FISH method. Different from other studies, Shim et al.[17] detected HER2 overexpression using DNA copy number testing, which is much easier and cheaper than that of FISH. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first report investigating the relationship between these parameters using FISH method for HER2 assessment.

The CagA protein of HP is a bacterial virulence factor, which is delivered into gastric epithelial cells via bacterial type IV secretion system. CagA-positive HP strains are known to be more virulent.[27] Shim et al.[17] revealed a positive correlation between HER2 amplification and CagA-positive HP, whereas other studies, including our study, could not find any relationship. The reason for these different results may be related to CagA positivity and CagA may be a biomarker for HER2 amplification. Further studies on large sample sizes are necessary to clarify the relationship of HER2 expression to CagA-positive and CagA-negative HP in GC.

Debate on the clinicopathologic features of HP-induced GC continues. It has been reported that HP plays an important role in the development of intestinal type and distal forms of GC.[9] However, recent studies suggested that there was no difference in HP seroprevalence between the majority of intestinal and diffuse types as well as proximal and distal forms of GC patients. Similar with these recent studies, we did not find any relationship between HP status and these parameters.[28],[29]

HP-negative patients with GC were reported to have poor prognosis, and it was recommended that these patients should be closely followed up after surgery.[30],[31],[32] The reason for this difference is not clear. Meimarakis et al.[32] hypothesized that tumor-specific immune responses might be downregulated in HP-negative patients, whereas Leung et al.[33] reported that microsatellite instability is strongly related to HP status. Consistent with these studies, we found that HP-negative GC patients had significantly longer OS than HP-positive patients (median OS, 27.4 months vs. 12.9 months, P = 0.046). Finally, it is known that the eradication of HP infection is an effective strategy for the prevention of GC.[34] The most important limitation of our study was the uncertainty in the past history of HP-related gastric diseases and eradication treatment, due to retrospective design.

 > Conclusions Top

We found that there was no correlation between HER2 expression and HP. However, debate on this topic seems to continue. We consider that the relationship between HER2 status and virulence factors of HP should be clarified and for this reason, comprehensive prospective trials with higher number of patients are required.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 > References Top

Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010;127:2893-917.  Back to cited text no. 1
Barnes CJ, Kumar R. Epidermal growth factor receptor family tyrosine kinases as signal integrators and therapeutic targets. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2003;22:301-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
Gravalos C, Jimeno A. HER2 in gastric cancer: A new prognostic factor and a novel therapeutic target. Ann Oncol 2008;19:1523-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
Tanner M, Hollmén M, Junttila TT, Kapanen AI, Tommola S, Soini Y, et al. Amplification of HER-2 in gastric carcinoma: Association with topoisomerase IIalpha gene amplification, intestinal type, poor prognosis and sensitivity to trastuzumab. Ann Oncol 2005;16:273-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
Grabsch H, Sivakumar S, Gray S, Gabbert HE, Müller W. HER2 expression in gastric cancer: Rare, heterogeneous and of no prognostic value – Conclusions from 924 cases of two independent series. Cell Oncol 2010;32:57-65.  Back to cited text no. 5
Hofmann M, Stoss O, Shi D, Büttner R, van de Vijver M, Kim W, et al. Assessment of a HER2 scoring system for gastric cancer: Results from a validation study. Histopathology 2008;52:797-805.  Back to cited text no. 6
Park DI, Yun JW, Park JH, Oh SJ, Kim HJ, Cho YK, et al. HER-2/neu amplification is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Dig Dis Sci 2006;51:1371-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
Baykara M, Benekli M, Ekinci O, Irkkan SC, Karaca H, Demirci U, et al. Clinical significance of HER2 overexpression in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers. J Gastrointest Surg 2015;19:1565-71.  Back to cited text no. 8
Neubauer A, Thiede C, Morgner A, Alpen B, Ritter M, Neubauer B, et al. Cure of Helicobacter pylori infection and duration of remission of low-grade gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:1350-5.  Back to cited text no. 9
Guillemin K, Salama NR, Tompkins LS, Falkow S. Cag pathogenicity İsland-specific responses of gastric epithelial cells to Helicobacter pylori infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:15136-41.  Back to cited text no. 10
Coyle WJ, Sedlack RE, Nemec R, Peterson R, Duntemann T, Murphy M, et al. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori normalizes elevated mucosal levels of epidermal growth factor and its receptor. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:2885-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
Wong BC, Wang WP, So WH, Shin VY, Wong WM, Fung FM, et al. Epidermal growth factor and its receptor in chronic active gastritis and gastroduodenal ulcer before and after Helicobacter pylori eradication. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001;15:1459-65.  Back to cited text no. 12
Kubicka S, Claas C, Staab S, Kühnel F, Zender L, Trautwein C. P53 mutation pattern and expression of c-erbB2 and c-met in gastric cancer: Relation to histological subtypes, Helicobacter pylori infection, and prognosis. Dig Dis Sci 2002;47:114-21.  Back to cited text no. 13
Shun CT, Wu MS, Lin JT, Chen SY, Wang HP, Lee WJ, et al. Relationship of p53 and c-erbB-2 expression to histopathological features, Helicobacter pylori infection and prognosis in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 1997;44:604-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
Wu MS, Shun CT, Wang HP, Sheu JC, Lee WJ, Wang TH, et al. Genetic alterations in gastric cancer: Relation to histological subtypes, tumor stage, and Helicobacter pylori infection. Gastroenterology 1997;112:1457-65.  Back to cited text no. 15
Wu MS, Shun CT, Sheu JC, Wang HP, Wang JT, Lee WJ, et al. Overexpression of mutant p53 and c-erbB-2 proteins and mutations of the p15 and p16 genes in human gastric carcinoma: With respect to histological subtypes and stages. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998;13:305-10.  Back to cited text no. 16
Shim JH, Yoon JH, Choi SS, Ashktorab H, Smoot DT, Song KY, et al. The effect of Helicobacter pylori CagA on the HER-2 copy number and expression in gastric cancer. Gene 2014;546:288-96.  Back to cited text no. 17
Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): A phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;376:687-97.  Back to cited text no. 18
Rotimi O, Cairns A, Gray S, Moayyedi P, Dixon MF. Histological identification of Helicobacter pylori: Comparison of staining methods. J Clin Pathol 2000;53:756-9.  Back to cited text no. 19
Forman D. The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in gastric cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1995;9 Suppl 2:71-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
Parsonnet J, Vandersteen D, Goates J, Sibley RK, Pritikin J, Chang Y. Helicobacter pylori infection in intestinal- and diffuse-type gastric adenocarcinomas. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991;83:640-3.  Back to cited text no. 21
Nomura A, Stemmermann GN, Chyou PH, Kato I, Perez-Perez GI, Blaser MJ. Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric carcinoma among Japanese Americans in Hawaii. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1132-6.  Back to cited text no. 22
Jorge O, Cuello Carrión FD, Jorge A, Ciocca DR. Helicobacter pylori infection affects the expression of PCNA, p53, c-erbB-2 and Bcl-2 in the human gastric mucosa. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2003;95:97-104, 89-96.  Back to cited text no. 23
Hibi K, Mitomi H, Koizumi W, Tanabe S, Saigenji K, Okayasu I. Enhanced cellular proliferation and p53 accumulation in gastric mucosa chronically infected with Helicobacter pylori. Am J Clin Pathol 1997;108:26-34.  Back to cited text no. 24
Kim MA, Lee HJ, Yang HK, Bang YJ, Kim WH. Heterogeneous amplification of ERBB2 in primary lesions is responsible for the discordant ERBB2 status of primary and metastatic lesions in gastric carcinoma. Histopathology 2011;59:822-31.  Back to cited text no. 25
Lee S, de Boer WB, Fermoyle S, Platten M, Kumarasinghe MP. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in gastric carcinoma: Issues related to heterogeneity in biopsies and resections. Histopathology 2011;59:832-40.  Back to cited text no. 26
Nagini S. Carcinoma of the stomach: A review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, molecular genetics and chemoprevention. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2012;4:156-69.  Back to cited text no. 27
Bhandari A, Crowe SE. Helicobacter pylori in gastric malignancies. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2012;14:489-96.  Back to cited text no. 28
Bornschein J, Selgrad M, Warnecke M, Kuester D, Wex T, Malfertheiner P. H. pylori infection is a key risk factor for proximal gastric cancer. Dig Dis Sci 2010;55:3124-31.  Back to cited text no. 29
Marrelli D, Pedrazzani C, Berardi A, Corso G, Neri A, Garosi L, et al. Negative Helicobacter pylori status is associated with poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. Cancer 2009;115:2071-80.  Back to cited text no. 30
Kang SY, Han JH, Ahn MS, Lee HW, Jeong SH, Park JS, et al.Helicobacter pylori infection as an independent prognostic factor for locally advanced gastric cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection. Int J Cancer 2012;130:948-58.  Back to cited text no. 31
Meimarakis G, Winter H, Assmann I, Kopp R, Lehn N, Kist M, et al.Helicobacter pylori as a prognostic indicator after curative resection of gastric carcinoma: A prospective study. Lancet Oncol 2006;7:211-22.  Back to cited text no. 32
Leung WK, Kim JJ, Kim JG, Graham DY, Sepulveda AR. Microsatellite instability in gastric intestinal metaplasia in patients with and without gastric cancer. Am J Pathol 2000;156:537-43.  Back to cited text no. 33
Suzuki H, Nishizawa T, Hibi T. Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. Future Microbiol 2010;5:639-48.  Back to cited text no. 34


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]

  [Table 1]


Similar in PUBMED
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  >Abstract>Introduction>Materials and Me...>Results>Discussion>Conclusions>Article Figures>Article Tables
  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded262    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal