|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 68-71
Increasing rates of Acinetobacter baumannii infection and resistance in an oncology department
Li Fan1, Zhe Wang2, Qiang Wang3, Zhijian Xiong4, Ying Xu1, Dandan Li1, Shiwen Zhou1
1 Clinical Pharmacology Base, Xinqiao Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
2 Department of Oncology, Southwest Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
3 Department of Pharmacy, Xinqiao Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
4 Department of Outpatient, Chinese PLA August First Film Studio, Beijing, China
|Date of Web Publication||8-Mar-2018|
Dr. Shiwen Zhou
Clinical Pharmacology Base, Xinqiao Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Objective: Acinetobacter baumannii is an opportunistic pathogen found in immunocompromised patients, especially cancer patients. This study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of cancer patients and the antimicrobial resistance of A.baumannii isolates.
Materials and Methods: Clinical isolates were collected from the oncology department of a general teaching hospital, and the clinical and demographic information of patients was obtained from the hospital's information system. Antimicrobial susceptibility was examined using the agar dilution method. Carbapenemase-encoding genes were amplified by polymerase chain reaction, and sequence types were determined by multilocus sequence typing.
Results: The isolation rate of A.baumannii increased annually in the oncology department. Multivariate analysis showed that only prior antibiotic use was an independent risk factor for A.baumannii infection. The use of antibiotics in A.baumannii-infected patients was significantly more frequent than in non-A.baumannii-infected patients. A.baumannii isolates were highly resistant to most tested antibiotics. The IMP-4 and VIM-2 genes were present in 6 and 2 isolates, respectively. Sixty isolates had 12 genotypes, and ST208 was the most common genotype.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that the use of antibiotics and hospital environmental pollution may be the main causes of A. baumannii infection.
Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii, antibiotic use, nosocomial infection, resistance
|How to cite this article:|
Fan L, Wang Z, Wang Q, Xiong Z, Xu Y, Li D, Zhou S. Increasing rates of Acinetobacter baumannii infection and resistance in an oncology department. J Can Res Ther 2018;14:68-71
|How to cite this URL:|
Fan L, Wang Z, Wang Q, Xiong Z, Xu Y, Li D, Zhou S. Increasing rates of Acinetobacter baumannii infection and resistance in an oncology department. J Can Res Ther [serial online] 2018 [cited 2022 Nov 26];14:68-71. Available from: https://www.cancerjournal.net/text.asp?2018/14/1/68/226758
| > Introduction|| |
Acinetobacter baumannii is becoming the most common pathogenic bacterium of clinical isolates, especially for nosocomial infections., Moreover, A. baumannii is an opportunistic pathogen and can live in the hospital environment for a month.,
A. baumannii easily infects immunocompromised and antibiotic-therapy patients, especially cancer patients., However, there has been little research on A. baumannii infections in Oncology Departments. Therefore, we analyzed the characteristics of cancer patients and the antimicrobial resistances of clinically isolated A. baumannii. The objective of the current study was to determine the relationship between A. baumannii infections in patients and antibiotic use as well as other risk factors.
| > Materials and Methods|| |
A. baumannii isolates were retrospectively collected from cancer patients with nosocomial infections at the oncology department of a general teaching hospital in Chongqing, China from January 2010 to December 2015. Nosocomial infection was defined according to the guideline of Centers for Disease Control. All A. baumannii samples of cancer patients were collected at 48 h after admission, and only one strain was isolated from the same patient. Patients recently colonized with A. baumannii who did not have any overt signs of infection were excluded from the study. In the clinical laboratory, these strains were first identified using the API 20-NE system. Further identification at the species level was carried out by detection of the species-specific blaOXA-51 gene and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the cancer patients, including gender, age, hematologic malignancy, radiation, hospitalization time, operation, and prior antibiotic use, were obtained from the hospital's information systems.
The determination of minimal inhibitory concentrations was carried out by the agar dilution procedure according to the guidelines of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2014). Twelve antibiotics were tested, including piperacillin, ceftazidime, cefepime, gentamicin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, amikacin, imipenem, meropenem, aztreonam and sulfamethoxazole. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853 and Escherichia coli ATCC25922 were used as control strains. The resistance rate of A. baumannii isolates was calculated as the number of resistant strains divided by the total number of strains.
Detection of the carbapenemase genes
The amplification of carbapenemase genes was performed with primers as described previously. Total genomic DNA of A. baumannii isolates was extracted using a DNeasy kit (Qiagen, Germany). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were purified and sequenced using an Applied Biosystems ABI 3730 Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Inc., USA). The sequence results were aligned using the software available on the NCBI website (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis
The multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis of A. baumannii isolates was carried out as previously described. The fragments of seven house-keeping genes, including cpn60, fusA, pyrG, gltA, rplB, recA, and rpoB, were determined by PCR amplification. A final 50-μl volume containing 25 μl of 2×Es Taq MasterMix, 1 μl of 10 μM each primers, and 2 μl of 10 ng/μl DNA was amplified in the GeneAmp PCR system 9700. PCR amplification conditions included an initial melt at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles (94°C, 30 s; 50°C, 30 s; 72°C, 30 s), and ended at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR products of seven genes were purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Germany) and then sequenced by the ABI 3730 automated DNA sequencer. The sequence types were generated using the software available on the MLST website (http://pubmlst.org/abaumannii/).
Multivariate analysis with binary logistic regression was conducted to examine the associations of risk factors with A. baumannii infection with control for potential confounders using the SPSS 17.0 software package (IBM, USA). Differences among groups were statistically analyzed using the Chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
| > Results|| |
There were 6,154 cancer inpatients during the study, and the infection rate was 9.9% (610). The distribution of common pathogenic bacteria in cancer patients from 2010 to 2015 is shown in [Figure 1]. Gram-negative bacteria were the major pathogens infecting tumors (59.7%), followed by Gram-positive bacteria (22.8%), and fungi (18.2%). The five most common pathogenic bacteria were E. coli (22.8%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (16.7%), Staphylococcus aureus (13.6%), A. baumannii (9.8%), and P. aeruginosa (8.7%). The A. baumannii isolation rate increased annually from 2010 to 2015 whereas S. aureus decreased annually. The isolation rates of other common pathogenic bacteria remained stable and showed no clear trend of change. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for A. baumannii infection showed that only prior antibiotic use was an independent risk factor [Table 1]. A comparison of antibiotic use between A. baumannii-infected and non-A. baumannii-infected patients are shown in [Table 2]. Among A. baumannii-infected patients, 58.3% (35) used antibiotics as a treatment, whereas there was only 26.2% (144) non-A. baumannii-infected patients who used antibiotics; this difference in the two groups was significant (P< 0.01). Among A. baumannii-infected patients, lung cancer patients were particularly vulnerable to nosocomial infection, accounting for 66.7% of these infections [Table 3]. The resistance of A. baumannii isolates to antibiotics is shown in [Table 4]. During the study, the rates of resistance increased annually. Bacterial strains were resistant to most of the antimicrobial agents tested. However, they had a relatively high susceptibility to sulfamethoxazole and levofloxacin.
|Figure 1: The distribution of common pathogenic bacteria in tumor patients from 2010 to 2015|
Click here to view
|Table 1: Multivariate analysis of risk factors for Acinetobacter baumannii infection|
Click here to view
|Table 2: Comparison of antibiotic use between Acinetobacter baumannii-infected and non-Acinetobacter baumannii-infected patients|
Click here to view
|Table 3: The relationship and composition ratio between tumor types and nosocomial infections|
Click here to view
|Table 4: The resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates to antibiotics|
Click here to view
Amplification of the carbapenemase genes revealed that the IMP gene was present in six clinical isolates and that the VIM gene was present in two isolates. There were no other carbapenemase genes presented in the isolates. Sequence analyses revealed that the amplified positive genes were IMP-4 and VIM-2. All eight MBL-producing strains were isolated from the past 3 years. The MLST results showed that the 60 isolated strains comprised of 12 genotypes. ST208 was the most common genotype with 28 strains, followed by ST92 (9 strains), and ST195 (7 strains). In addition, five strains were genotype ST22, two strains were ST25, ST191, and ST90, and one strain each was ST75, ST218, ST368, ST365, and ST172. Five IMP-4 positive strains were genotype ST208, and one was ST368. Two VIM-2- positive were genotype ST191.
| > Discussion|| |
A. baumannii is an opportunistic pathogen, frequently isolated from immunocompromised patients, including cancer patients., Most studies have focused on resistant A. baumannii infections in clinical treatments. Little research has been performed on the spectrum of pathogens in oncology departments because of the small sample sizes. In our study, we found that A. baumannii was one of the most isolated pathogens in the oncology department. Moreover, the rates of isolation and antimicrobial resistance were increasing., No clear changes in the isolation rates of other pathogens were observed during the study. E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, were the most common pathogenic bacteria in a previous study,, which is similar to results from 2010 to 2014. The increasing isolation rate of A. baumannii was considered a highly resistant rate, which was confirmed in the risk factor analysis.
In the multivariate analysis of A. baumannii infection risk factors, we found that only prior antibiotic use was a risk factor of A. baumannii infection. Although risk factors differed among different studies, most found that antibiotic use was mainly associated with infections.,, Then, we further analyzed the differences in antibacterial drug use among different pathogenic bacterial infections. More than 50% patients of A. baumannii infection were using antibiotics, which is more than the non-A. baumannii-infected patients. The result suggests the prior antibiotic use was the important reason of A. baumannii infection.
Among 60 isolated A. baumannii strains, 28 were ST208, and 5 IMP-positive isolates were ST208. The results of ST gene typing and antimicrobial resistance gene analysis suggested that there was small-scale outbreak of A. baumannii in the oncology department. The source of the A. baumannii infection may be hospital environmental pollution or A. baumannii-infected inpatients. A. baumannii MLST types have differed in different reports,,, which may be due to the inconstancy of the A. baumannii genome. It can survive in hospital settings for a long time and potentially cause serious hospital outbreaks.
| > Conclusion|| |
A. baumannii has now become the most common pathogenic bacterium in the hospital, and antibiotic use and hospital environmental pollution may be the main cause. To reduce the rate of A. baumannii infection, establishing more pertinent and reasonable infection control measures is necessary. Bacterial spectrum analysis and resistance surveillance like those used in this study will be a good approach.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| > References|| |
Yang Y, Wang J, Fu Y, Ruan Z, Yu Y. Acinetobacter seifertii
isolated from China: Genomic sequence and molecular epidemiology analyses. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e2937.
Sengstock DM, Thyagarajan R, Apalara J, Mira A, Chopra T, Kaye KS, et al.
Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
: An emerging pathogen among older adults in community hospitals and nursing homes. Clin Infect Dis 2010;50:1611-6.
Peleg AY, Seifert H, Paterson DL. Acinetobacter baumannii
: Emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 2008;21:538-82.
Chu YW, Leung CM, Houang ET, Ng KC, Leung CB, Leung HY, et al.
Skin carriage of Acinetobacters
in Hong Kong. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:2962-7.
Al-Hassan L, El Mehallawy H, Amyes SG. Diversity in Acinetobacter baumannii
isolates from paediatric cancer patients in Egypt. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013;19:1082-8.
Fukuta Y, Muder RR, Agha ME, Clarke LG, Wagener MM, Hensler AM, et al.
Risk factors for acquisition of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
among cancer patients. Am J Infect Control 2013;41:1249-52.
Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128-40.
Chen Z, Li H, Feng J, Li Y, Chen X, Guo X, et al.
NDM-1 encoded by a pNDM-BJ01-like plasmid p3SP-NDM in clinical Enterobacter aerogenes.
Front Microbiol 2015;6:294.
Diancourt L, Passet V, Nemec A, Dijkshoorn L, Brisse S. The population structure of Acinetobacter baumannii
: Expanding multiresistant clones from an ancestral susceptible genetic pool. PLoS One 2010;5:e10034.
Turkoglu M, Mirza E, Tunçcan OG, Erdem GU, Dizbay M, Yaǧcı M, et al. Acinetobacter baumannii
infection in patients with hematologic malignancies in Intensive Care Unit: Risk factors and impact on mortality. J Crit Care 2011;26:460-7.
Zhao WS, Liu GY, Mi ZH, Zhang F. Coexistence of blaOXA-23 with armA and novel gyrA mutation in a pandrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
isolate from the blood of a patient with haematological disease in China. J Hosp Infect 2011;77:278-9.
Gudiol C, Bodro M, Simonetti A, Tubau F, González-Barca E, Cisnal M, et al.
Changing aetiology, clinical features, antimicrobial resistance, and outcomes of bloodstream infection in neutropenic cancer patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013;19:474-9.
Zheng ZJ, Tang YM. Drug resistance of extended-spectrum-β-lactamases-producing bacteria in children with hematological malignancy after chemotherapy. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi 2012;14:518-20.
Trecarichi EM, Pagano L, Candoni A, Pastore D, Cattaneo C, Fanci R, et al.
Current epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance data for bacterial bloodstream infections in patients with hematologic malignancies: An Italian Multicentre Prospective Survey. Clin Microbiol Infect 2015;21:337-43.
Rabello LS, Silva JR, Azevedo LC, Souza I, Torres VB, Rosolem MM, et al.
Clinical outcomes and microbiological characteristics of severe pneumonia in cancer patients: A prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0120544.
Tsakiridou E, Makris D, Daniil Z, Manoulakas E, Chatzipantazi V, Vlachos O, et al. Acinetobacter baumannii
infection in prior ICU bed occupants is an independent risk factor for subsequent cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:193516.
Selasi GN, Nicholas A, Jeon H, Lee YC, Yoo JR, Heo ST, et al.
Genetic basis of antimicrobial resistance and clonal dynamics of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
sequence type 191 in a Korean hospital. Infect Genet Evol 2015;36:1-7.
Wu W, He Y, Lu J, Lu Y, Wu J, Liu Y, et al.
Transition of blaOXA-58-like to blaOXA-23-like in Acinetobacter baumannii
clinical isolates in Southern China: An 8-year study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0137174.
Zowawi HM, Sartor AL, Sidjabat HE, Balkhy HH, Walsh TR, Al Johani SM, et al.
Molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
isolates in the gulf cooperation council states: Dominance of OXA-23-type producers. J Clin Microbiol 2015;53:896-903.
Ahmed SS, Alp E. Genotyping methods for monitoring the epidemic evolution of A. baumannii
strains. J Infect Dev Ctries 2015;9:347-54.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]
|This article has been cited by|
||Infections Due to Acinetobacter baumannii–calcoaceticus Complex: Escalation of Antimicrobial Resistance and Evolving Treatment Options
| ||Joseph P. Lynch, Nina M. Clark, George G. Zhanel |
| ||Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2022; 43(01): 097 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
Synthesis, characterization, and antimicrobial activity of lipophilic
'-bis-substituted triazolium salts
| ||Julie A. Wilson, Zi Jie Lin, Isabelle Rodriguez, Thong Ta, Luke Martz, Dominic Fico, Shanina S. Johnson, John D. Gorden, Kerri L. Shelton, Lauren B. King |
| ||Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry. 2021; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Evaluation of carcinogenic activities and sperm abnormalities of Gram-negative bacterial metabolites isolated from cancer patients after subcutaneous injection in albino rats
| ||Mervat Morsy Abbas Ahmed El-Gendy, Khaled G. Abdel-Wahhab, Nabila S. Hassan, Esraa Ahmed El-Bondkly, Ayman A. Farghaly, Hanan F. Ali, Sanaa A. Ali, Ahmed M. A. El-Bondkly |
| ||Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2021; 114(3): 287 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Co-Existence of Carbapenemase-Encoding Genes in Acinetobacter baumannii from Cancer Patients
| ||Reham Wasfi, Fatma Rasslan, Safaa S. Hassan, Hossam M. Ashour, Ola A. Abd El-Rahman |
| ||Infectious Diseases and Therapy. 2021; 10(1): 291 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, and Cytotoxic Activities of Juglans regia L. Pellicle Extract
| ||Floriana D’Angeli, Giuseppe Antonio Malfa, Adriana Garozzo, Giovanni Li Volti, Carlo Genovese, Aldo Stivala, Daria Nicolosi, Francesco Attanasio, Francesco Bellia, Simone Ronsisvalle, Rosaria Acquaviva |
| ||Antibiotics. 2021; 10(2): 159 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Microbiota Alterations in Gastrointestinal Cancers
| || Karwowska, Szemraj, Karwowski |
| ||Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(2): 585 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Antibiotic resistance assessment of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from Tehran hospitals due to the presence of efflux pumps encoding genes (adeA and adeS genes) by molecular method
| ||Batool Basatian-Tashkan, Mohammad Niakan, Mansoor Khaledi, Hamed Afkhami, Fatemeh Sameni, Shahriar Bakhti, Reza Mirnejad |
| ||BMC Research Notes. 2020; 13(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|