|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 10 | Page : 688-693
Proteinuria: Associated with poor outcome in patients with small cell lung cancer
Shun-Neng Hsu1, Yu-Juei Hsu1, Chin Lin2, Sui-Lung Su2, Shih-Hua Lin1
1 Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
2 National Defense Medical Center, Graduate Institute of Life Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan
|Date of Web Publication||24-Sep-2018|
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Tri.Service General Hospital, No. 325, Sector 2, Chenggong Road, Neihu, Taipei 114
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Objective: Although proteinuria has been increasingly reported in lung cancers, especially small cell lung cancer (SCLC), its clinical impact in patients with SCLC remains unknown.
Materials and Methods: We analyzed patients with newly-diagnosed SCLC confirmed by clinical, radiological, and pathological features over a 7-year period. Pretreatment proteinuria was assessed by quantitative analysis of 24-h urine before receiving chemotherapy. The demographic, laboratory characteristics and its impact on survival outcome were evaluated.
Results: There were 140 SCLC patients with the mean age of 70.2 years, extensive stage (89.3%), and male predominance (81.4%). Significant proteinuria (>300 mg/day) occurred in 17.4% (24/140) patients. Patients with proteinuria had significant higher serum blood urea nitrogen, lower total calcium, total protein, albumin levels, and lower creatinine clearance (Ccr) (24-h Ccr). Daily protein excretion was negatively correlated with serum total protein, albumin, and Ccr. Using a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model, proteinuria (hazard ratio, 1.943, 95% confidence interval 1.148–3.259, P = 0.010), along with poor performance status and serum albumin, were independent risk factors of all-cause mortality. Proteinuria was also associated with poor survival status (6.08 vs. 11.88 months, P < 0.001), especially in those who had severe proteinuria (>2 g/day).
Conclusions: Proteinuria is not uncommon and associated with all-cause mortality in patients with SCLC.
Keywords: Daily protein excretion, outcome, proteinuria, small cell lung cancer
|How to cite this article:|
Hsu SN, Hsu YJ, Lin C, Su SL, Lin SH. Proteinuria: Associated with poor outcome in patients with small cell lung cancer. J Can Res Ther 2018;14, Suppl S3:688-93
| > Introduction|| |
Lung cancer is the second most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. In patients with lung cancer, acute kidney injury is the most commonly renal complication, such as prerenal volume depletion, nephrotoxic chemotherapeutic agents (cisplatin-based), tumor lysis syndrome, metastatic kidney infiltrations, or postrenal obstruction. In the subgroup of lung cancers, patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) frequently manifest paraneoplastic syndromes, such as endocrine, neuromuscular, skeletal, vascular, hematological, and metabolic abnormalities. Paraneoplastic syndrome with renal involvement has been reported and may manifest asymptomatic proteinuria to the severe nephrotic syndrome.
Proteinuria was reported and ranged from 10% to 30% in patients with lung cancers (SCLC and non-SCLC [NSCLC]). Although proteinuria is more frequent in SCLC than other histological types,, its clinical significance has not yet elucidated.,,, In this study, we aim to evaluate the incidence of proteinuria and its clinical impact on patients with newly diagnosed SCLC over a 7-year span. Results to be reported indicate that approximately 17.4% of SCLC patients had significant proteinuria, which was associated with poor survival status, especially in those who had severe proteinuria.
| > Materials and Methods|| |
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Human Studies at Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan. We investigated patients with newly diagnosed SCLC from January 2004 through December 2011. The selection of the enrolled patients was showed in [Figure 1]. SCLC was confirmed by clinical, radiological, and pathological features in all cases. For treatment purposes, the two-stage system (limited or extensive stage) was used. The stage procedure included a comprehensive laboratory panel, bronchoscopy, the chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, or CT of the brain and bone scan.
Treatment protocol of small cell lung cancer
The first-line chemotherapeutic agent with platinum-based regimen was prescribed.,,, Cisplatin was dosed at 75 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, or carboplatin at Calvert AUC5 intravenously on the day 1 with etoposide at 140 mg/m2 intravenously for 3 days. Thoracic radiotherapy was typically given over 5 weeks with cumulative doses ranging from 60 to 70 Gy divided in 30–35 fractions., Prophylactic cranial irradiation was administered with 30 Gy divided into 10 fractions.,
Study measures and data collection
The end-point was all-cause mortality, and survival outcome was calculated as the period from the date of diagnosis to that of death which was defined as any death occurred during the hospitalization or within 1 week after discharge. Baseline demographic features, disease stage, performance status, chemotherapy regimen, accompanying comorbid conditions, smoking history, and survival time were collected.
Assessment of proteinuria
Proteinuria was defined as daily excreting more than 300 mg of protein per 24 h (24-h density polyethylene [DPE] >300 mg) according to The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines. Pretreatment proteinuria was assessed before receiving chemotherapy. All enrolled patients were divided into nonproteinuria (<300 mg/day) and proteinuria group (>300 mg/day).
Categorical and continuous variables were presented as numbers or proportion and mean ± standard deviation. The differences in the study variables were tested by unpaired Student's t-test or Chi-square test. All variables were assessed using the Cox proportional hazard model. Univariate analysis was first done between groups, and those (confounding factors) with a P < 0.05 were included in the final multivariate analysis. For compared with survival status, the Kaplan–Meier curve was used to present their difference, and the log-rank test was used to test. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.
| > Results|| |
As shown in [Figure 1], a total of 140 SCLC patients were analyzed. The mean age of all patients was 70.2 years (range 43–90) with male-predominant (male:female = 114:26). Ninety-five (67.9%) patients had the performance status at 0–2 and 45 (33.1%) had the performance status at 3–4. The extensive stage (91.7% vs. 88.8%), history of hypertension (58.3% vs. 37.1%), diabetes (33.3% vs. 19.8%), and smoking prevalence (79.2% vs. 87.1%) and amount (37.3 vs. 38.5 pack-year) were more frequently encountered in patients with proteinuria than without. Totally, there were 64 (45.8%) patients who received cisplatin, whereas 29 (7.3%) received carboplatin as the chemotherapeutic agent. Moreover, there were 47 (33.6) patients who did not receive chemotherapy due to poor health status. Sixteen (11.4%) patients had ever received prophylactic cranial irradiation.
The significance in patients with pretreatment proteinuria
As shown in [Table 1], the baseline demographic and laboratory characteristics were compared between patients with (n = 24) or without proteinuria (n = 116). The significant proteinuria was present in 24 patients (17.14%). The mean age of patients with proteinuria was older than those without proteinuria (72.8 vs. 69.7 years), but no significant difference was found. The significant differences were evident between two groups in terms of 24-h DPE, creatinine clearance (Ccr), serum BUN, total calcium, total protein, and albumin. The median 24-h DPE in proteinuria group was 1547.9 mg (range 315–9176 mg), and there were two cases presenting with nephrotic syndrome. One was diagnosed to have IgM nephropathy, and the other was membranous glomerulonephritis. The mean Ccr in proteinuria group was significantly lower than without proteinuria (55.7 vs. 79.5 ml/min, P = 0.002). In addition, serum BUN (30.5 vs. 19.6 mg/dL, P = 0.002), total calcium (8.4 vs. 8.9 mg/dL, P = 0.002), total protein (5.7 vs. 6.7 g/dL, P < 0.001), and albumin (3.3 vs. 3.7 g/dL, P = 0.009) revealed significant difference between two groups. Patients who had proteinuria were associated with worsen renal function, and lower levels of serum total calcium, total protein, and albumin. Further analysis indicated a significant negative correlation between 24-h DPE and levels of serum TP (r = −0.304, P = 0.001), 24-h Ccr (r = −0.208, P = 0.014), [Figure 2]a and serum albumin (r = −0.405, P < 0.001), [Figure 2]b.
|Table 1: Baseline demographic, clinical and prechemotherapy laboratory characteristics, classified by proteinuria|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Correlation between 24-h density polyethylene and 24-h creatinine clearance (a) or serum albumin (b)|
Click here to view
Analysis of factors related to all-cause mortality
Correlations of all-cause mortality with proteinuria were analyzed by univariate analyses. As shown in [Table 2], the proteinuria, age, extensive stage, performance status, and chemotherapeutic treatment with cisplatin or carboplatin, 24-h Ccr, serum total protein, and albumin were significantly correlated with all-cause mortality (P < 0.05). To identify independent risk factors for survival, all variables that were significantly different were subjected to regression analyses [Table 3]. It showed proteinuria (hazard ratio [HR] 1.943, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.148–3.259, P = 0.010), performance status (HR 1.633, 95% CI 1.013–2.632, P = 0.044), and serum albumin (HR 0.658, 95% CI 0.452–0.959, P = 0.029) were independent risk factors of all-cause mortality.
|Table 2: Cox proportional hazard model of factors associated with all-cause mortality in patients with SCLC|
Click here to view
|Table 3: Cox proportional hazard model for multi-factors associated with all-cause mortality in patients with SCLC|
Click here to view
Groups comparisons of survival outcome
The patients were subgrouped into three groups (<300 mg/day, 300–2 g/day, and >2 g/day) and the survival was compared. The Kaplan–Meier curves revealed a significant difference of survival rate among three groups [Figure 3], P < 0.001]. Significant proteinuria was associated with poor survival status (6.08 vs. 11.88 months, P < 0.001), especially in those who had severe proteinuria (>2 g/day).
|Figure 3: Proportion of free of death, stratified by the severity of proteinuria|
Click here to view
| > Discussion|| |
In this study, we showed that 17.4% of patients had significant proteinuria which were higher than in the general population (2–4%)., Importantly, proteinuria was an independent prognostic factor of all-cause mortality after adjusting all confounding factors. Furthermore, more severe proteinuria was associated with poor survival status. This was the first study in Asia countries to investigate the clinical impact of proteinuria in patients with SCLC.
Proteinuria, a marker of kidney disease, is strongly associated with the risk of adverse outcomes. Evidence suggests that proteinuria not only has implications for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in general population but also in patients with chronic kidney disease or malignancies.,,,, Despite its evolving role as a major risk factor of all-cause mortality, little is known about the clinical impact of proteinuria in patients with SCLC.
SCLC is the most aggressive histologic type and the median survival without treatment is approximately 2–4 months., The identification of poor prognostic factors is the most importance for the treatment of patients with SCLC. Several prognostic parameters have been previously reported including extensive disease, performance status, serum lactate dehydrogenase level and gender. However, the correlation between proteinuria and survival outcome in patients with SCLC has not yet been elucidated. Our results showed that the more severe proteinuria group was associated with poor survival, indicating that proteinuria is an independent prognostic factor for all-cause mortality. The similar result was also observed in the previous study, thus further supported that proteinuria is a poor prognostic factor independent of race. The finding is important because current clinical practice for predicting outcomes in SCLC are solely based on limited or extensive stage without explicit consideration of the concomitant proteinuria.
In accordance with the distribution of paraneoplastic renal syndrome in patients with different histologic types of lung cancer,,,, a European retrospective study using urine dipstick test demonstrated that the proteinuria was significantly higher in patients with SCLC as compared to those with NSCLC (37.5% vs. 28%)., Our result showed that approximately half of the prevalence [17.4%, [Table 4] of proteinuria observed than in the European report.,,,,,,, The different methodology with an accurate test for quantification of proteinuria and the racial difference may explain the difference between ours and European and the previous reported investigation.,
|Table 4: The prevalence and outcome of albuminuria or proteinuria in patients with lung cancers or SCLC|
Click here to view
In this study, we also found a negative correlation between proteinuria and serum total protein and albumin levels and 24-h Ccr. These observations indicated that SCLC patients with significant proteinuria were associated with poorer nutritional status and more severe renal dysfunction, which might explain why patients with proteinuria have a poorer prognosis.,, Smoking is an another well-established risk factor for SCLC, and epidemiologic studies suggest that smokers manifest severe proteinuria and worsen renal function. The precise pathogenesis of the nephrotoxic effect on the kidney is still under investigation, and several potential mechanisms of smoking-induced renal damage have been proposed. Even though these factors may explain the relationship between proteinuria and cancer prognosis, smoking only can partially explain the development of proteinuria in SCLC and no significant difference was found in our study results.
There are some limitations in our study. First, due to the retrospective study, study design and smaller sample size of the study, the prognostic impact of proteinuria needs to be confirmed by large, prospective cohort studies. Second, the prevalence of proteinuria may be underestimated because we only enrolled the cases whose 24-h DPE were available and chart review may raise some selection bias. Third, we did not measure the glomerular and tubular damage biomarkers and did not undergo renal biopsy, which may be helpful to elucidate the source of proteinuria.
| > Conclusions|| |
We demonstrated that the prevalence of proteinuria is not uncommon in patients with SCLC. In addition, proteinuria has been proven to be a poor prognostic factor of all-cause mortality. The routine screen of proteinuria in SCLC patients may be helpful for clinicians to provide better patient care. Whether reducing proteinuria improves survival in patients with SCLC needs further investigations.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| > References|| |
Lam AQ, Humphreys BD. Onco-nephrology: AKI in the cancer patient. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2012;7:1692-700.
Bacchetta J, Juillard L, Cochat P, Droz JP. Paraneoplastic glomerular diseases and malignancies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2009;70:39-58.
Galloway J. Remarks ON HODGKIN'S DISEASE. Br Med J 1922;2:1201-1208.2.
Pedersen LM, Milman N. Prevalence and prognostic significance of proteinuria in patients with lung cancer. Acta Oncol 1996;35:691-5.
Thariat J, Vendrely B, Roca S, Ravaud A, Bay JO, Lacout A, et al.
Renal involvement in cancer and renal paraneoplastic syndromes. Bull Cancer 2012;99:263-75.
Sawyer N, Wadsworth J, Wijnen M, Gabriel R. Prevalence, concentration, and prognostic importance of proteinuria in patients with malignancies. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988;296:1295-8.
Puolijoki H, Mustonen J, Pettersson E, Pasternack A, Lahdensuo A. Proteinuria and haematuria are frequently present in patients with lung cancer. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1989;4:947-50.
Pedersen LM, Milman N. Microalbuminuria in patients with lung cancer. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:76-80.
Evans WK, Shepherd FA, Feld R, Osoba D, Dang P, Deboer G. VP-16 and cisplatin as first-line therapy for small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1985;3:1471-7.
Mascaux C, Paesmans M, Berghmans T, Branle F, Lafitte JJ, Lemaitre F, et al.
Asystematic review of the role of etoposide and cisplatin in the chemotherapy of small cell lung cancer with methodology assessment and meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 2000;30:23-36.
Okamoto H, Watanabe K, Kunikane H, Yokoyama A, Kudoh S, Asakawa T, et al.
Randomised phase III trial of carboplatin plus etoposide vs split doses of cisplatin plus etoposide in elderly or poor-risk patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer: JCOG 9702. Br J Cancer 2007;97:162-9.
Larive S, Bombaron P, Riou R, Fournel P, Perol M, Lena H, et al.
Carboplatin-etoposide combination in small cell lung cancer patients older than 70 years: A phase II trial. Lung Cancer 2002;35:1-7.
Pignon JP, Arriagada R, Ihde DC, Johnson DH, Perry MC, Souhami RL, et al.
Ameta-analysis of thoracic radiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1618-24.
Warde P, Payne D. Does thoracic irradiation improve survival and local control in limited-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung? A meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:890-5.
Aupérin A, Arriagada R, Pignon JP, Le Péchoux C, Gregor A, Stephens RJ, et al.
Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission. Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Overview Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med 1999;341:476-84.
Sørensen JB. The role of prophylactic brain irradiation in small cell lung cancer treatment. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2003;59:128-33.
National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39 2 Suppl 1:S1-266.
Wagner DK, Harris T, Madans JH. Proteinuria as a biomarker: Risk of subsequent morbidity and mortality. Environ Res 1994;66:160-72.
Currie G, Delles C. Proteinuria and its relation to cardiovascular disease. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis 2013;7:13-24.
Turin TC, Tonelli M, Manns BJ, Ahmed SB, Ravani P, James M, et al.
Proteinuria and life expectancy. Am J Kidney Dis 2013;61:646-8.
Kim MJ, Kang YU, Kim CS, Choi JS, Bae EH, Ma SK, et al.
Proteinuria as a risk factor for mortality in patients with colorectal cancer. Yonsei Med J 2013;54:1194-201.
Iff S, Craig JC, Turner R, Chapman JR, Wang JJ, Mitchell P, et al
. Reduced estimated GFR and cancer mortality. Am J Kidney Dis 2014;63:23-30.
Cooper S, Spiro SG. Small cell lung cancer: Treatment review. Respirology 2006;11:241-8.
Daveau C, Le Péchoux C, Besse B, Ferreira I, Amarouch A, Vicenzi L, et al.
The role of radiotherapy in the management of patients with small cell lung cancer. Rev Mal Respir 2007;24 (8 Pt 2):6S171-9.
Kaplan BS, Klassen J, Gault MH. Glomerular injury in patients with neoplasia. Annu Rev Med 1976;27:117-25.
Eagen JW. Glomerulopathies of neoplasia. Kidney Int 1977;11:297-303.
Rudman D, Del Rio A, Akgun S, Frumin E. Novel proteins and peptides in the urine of patients with advanced neoplastic disease. Am J Med 1969;46:174-87.
Gagliano RG, Costanzi JJ, Beathard GA, Sarles HE, Bell JD. The nephrotic syndrome associated with neoplasia: An unusual paraneoplastic syndrome. Report of a case and review of the literature. Am J Med 1976;60:1026-31.
Lefaucheur C, Stengel B, Nochy D, Martel P, Hill GS, Jacquot C, et al.
Membranous nephropathy and cancer: Epidemiologic evidence and determinants of high-risk cancer association. Kidney Int 2006;70:1510-7.
Zech P, Colon S, Pointet P, Deteix P, Labeeuw M, Leitienne P. The nephrotic syndrome in adults aged over 60: Etiology, evolution and treatment of 76 cases. Clin Nephrol 1982;17:232-6.
Kingswood JC, Banks RA, Tribe CR, Owen-Jones J, Mackenzie JC. Renal biopsy in the elderly: Clinicopathological correlations in 143 patients. Clin Nephrol 1984;22:183-7.
Burstein DM, Korbet SM, Schwartz MM. Membranous glomerulonephritis and malignancy. Am J Kidney Dis 1993;22:5-10.
Row PG, Cameron JS, Turner DR, Evans DJ, White RH, Ogg CS, et al.
Membranous nephropathy. Long-term follow-up and association with neoplasia. Q J Med 1975;44:207-39.
Noel LH, Zanetti M, Droz D, Barbanel C. Long-term prognosis of idiopathic membranous glomerulonephritis. Study of 116 untreated patients. Am J Med 1979;66:82-90.
Chavaz A, Mignon F, Morel-Maroger L, Richet G. Extramembranous glomerulitis. Apropos of 92 cases. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1977;107:899-907.
Cahen R, Francois B, Trolliet P, Gilly J, Parchoux B. Aetiology of membranous glomerulonephritis: A prospective study of 82 adult patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1989;4:172-80.
Kannel WB, Stampfer MJ, Castelli WP, Verter J. The prognostic significance of proteinuria: The Framingham study. Am Heart J 1984;108:1347-52.
Price CP, Newall RG, Boyd JC. Use of protein: Creatinine ratio measurements on random urine samples for prediction of significant proteinuria: A systematic review. Clin Chem 2005;51:1577-86.
Konta T. Clinical significance of proteinuria and renal function: Findings from a population-based cohort, the Takahata study. Rinsho Byori 2013;61:629-34.
Dales LG, Friedman GD, Siegelaub AB, Seltzer CC, Ury HK. Cigarette smoking habits and urine characteristics: Urinalysis abnormalities are more common is smokers, but the reasons are unclear. Nephron 1978;20:167-70.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]
|This article has been cited by|
||Trace proteinuria as a risk factor for cancer death in a general population
| ||Masaru Matsui, Kazuhiko Tsuruya, Hisako Yoshida, Kunitoshi Iseki, Shouichi Fujimoto, Tsuneo Konta, Toshiki Moriyama, Kunihiro Yamagata, Ichiei Narita, Masato Kasahara, Yugo Shibagaki, Masahide Kondo, Koichi Asahi, Tsuyoshi Watanabe |
| ||Scientific Reports. 2021; 11(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Proteinuria as a Biomarker for COVID-19 Severity
| ||Hajar Ouahmi, Johan Courjon, Lucas Morand, Juliette François, Vincent Bruckert, Romain Lombardi, Vincent Esnault, Barbara Seitz-Polski, Elisa Demonchy, Jean Dellamonica, Sonia Boyer-Suavet |
| ||Frontiers in Physiology. 2021; 12 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
Prognostic Value of a Nomogram Based on the Dynamic Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio for Patients with Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer
| ||Butuo Li, Chao Jiang, Ruiqing Wang, Bing Zou, Peng Xie, Wanlong Li, Xindong Sun, Jinming Yu, Linlin Wang |
| ||OncoTargets and Therapy. 2020; Volume 13: 9043 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|