Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 14  |  Issue : 10  |  Page : 661-666

2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography versus conventional imaging for the diagnosis of breast cancer and lymph node metastases

1 Department of Surgery, Linyi People's Hospital, Linyi 276003, Shandong Province, China
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Jinhua Central Hospital, Jinhua Hospital of Zhejiang University, Jinhua 321000, Zhejiang, China

Correspondence Address:
Guanghua Wen
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Jinhua Central Hospital, Jinhua Hospital of Zhejiang University, Mingyue Road 351, Jinhua 321000, Zhejiang
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.207069

Rights and Permissions

Context: Proper preoperative staging is vital in the treatment of breast cancer patients. Fluorine-18-labeled 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) and conventional diagnostic modalities including ultrasonography (US), mammography (MG), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) play a greater role. Aims: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET in detecting primary breast cancer as compared with US, MG, and MRI, and in axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) staging in Chinese women. Settings and Design: It is a study of diagnostic accuracy. Subjects and Methods: Thirty-one female patients, with biopsy established breast carcinoma, were recruited and analyzed retrospectively. All patients underwent 18F-FDG-PET, MG, US, and MRI. FDG-PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary breast cancer and detecting ALNs metastases were compared with MG, US, and MRI. Statistical Analysis Used: Sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value (PPV), and negative-predictive value (NPV) of FDG-PET imaging for primary breast cancers and ALN staging were analyzed using standard statistical analyses. Results: In 31 patients with cytologically established invasive breast carcinoma, the sensitivities of US, MG, MRI, and FDG-PET/CT were 90% (28/31), 84% (26/31), 97% (30/31), and 94% (29/31), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, PPV, and NPV of US, MRI, and FDG-PET/CT in ALN staging (maximum standardized uptake value cutoff at 1.5) were 80%, 86%, 84%, 80%, and 90%; 90%, 95%, 94%, 90%, and 95%; and 90%, 86%, 87%, 90%, and 95%, respectively. Conclusions: US and MRI should remain the first line for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Both MRI and FDG-PET/CT could accurately diagnose the primary breast cancer and stage the axilla lymph nodes, but further large population study is needed.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded165    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal