Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 1318-1320

The diagnosis of mesenteric fibromatosis: A 90-month five patients case report

Department of General Surgery, Medical and Health Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

Date of Web Publication7-Feb-2017

Correspondence Address:
Zhongtao Zhang
Department of General Surgery, Medical and Health Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong'an Road, Xicheng, Beijing, 100050
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.199539

Rights and Permissions
 > Abstract 

Mesenteric fibromatosis (MF) is a rare tumor (2–4 cases per 1 million people annually) with few presented features. In this case study, we reported five MF patients, one of whom suffered a recurrence. Patients received renogram, colonoscopy, cystoscopy, and gastrointestinal examinations. Histology and immunohistochemistry evaluations were performed after the surgical resection. Hormone levels were measured before and after the surgery. It was found that clinical imaging readily confirmed an abnormal mass but was unable to distinguish MF from other tumors. Histology and immunohistochemistry were definitive diagnoses because the tissue was vimentin ± β–catenin ± CD117/CD34. Furthermore, the patient who suffered a recurrence showed an elevated estrogen level. A 6-month postoperative administration of letrozole drove the estrogen down to normal level. Our study showed that vimentin, β–catenin, CD117, and CD34 were the markers for MF whereas medical imaging, and estrogen level could be used for the complimentary purpose.

Keywords: β–catenin, estrogen, mesenteric fibromatosis, vimentin

How to cite this article:
Li P, Zhang Z, Qin S, Li J. The diagnosis of mesenteric fibromatosis: A 90-month five patients case report. J Can Res Ther 2016;12:1318-20

How to cite this URL:
Li P, Zhang Z, Qin S, Li J. The diagnosis of mesenteric fibromatosis: A 90-month five patients case report. J Can Res Ther [serial online] 2016 [cited 2021 May 7];12:1318-20. Available from: https://www.cancerjournal.net/text.asp?2016/12/4/1318/199539

 > Introduction Top

Fibromatosis is a rare type of benign tumor that is locally invasive but not metastatic. It occurs primarily in the abdominal wall and in extremely rare cases, can originate from the mesentery. Mesenteric fibromatosis (MF) is particularly challenging for diagnosis because of its lack of specific presenting features. Previous case reports showed that pyrexia, ileus, and abdominal mass were most common but not definite features.[1],[2] In our case study, our reported five patients with MF, one of whom suffered a recurrence 1 year after the surgical resection.

 > Case Report Top

Five MF patients were identified at Beijing Friendship Hospital. Informed consents were obtained from all patients. Their symptoms and surgical history can be found in [Table 1].
Table 1: Patients' symptoms and history of surgery

Click here to view


Blood concentrations of carcinoembryonic antigen, alpha-fetoprotein, CA125, and CA199 in all patients were measured before and after the surgical resection. A preoperative increased level of CA199 was observed but it fell to normal levels after the surgery. All the other protein concentrations remained in the physiological ranges throughout the surgery. It was noteworthy that the estradiol concentration of patient 5a reached 199.20 mol/L in a follow-up examination 1 year after the primary surgical resection. The estradiol concentration remained abnormally high in an examination 2 weeks after the secondary resection. However, the concentration fell down to normal range after a 6-month administration of letrozole.

Ultrasound examinations of patients 1–5a showed tumor masses without clear borders or blood flow [Figure 1]a. The masses in patients one and two were cystic-solid whereas those in patients 3, 4, and 5a solid. According to computed tomography (CT) scans, tumor masses in patients 1–4 showed clear borders [Figure 1]b. In addition, tumor masses in patient one, and four were solid whereas those in patient two and three cystic-solid. Furthermore, patient one showed an enlargement of sigmoid colon whereas the intestine and bladder of patient four depressed and dislodged. Cystic gas was observed in patient two. Plain scanning yielded a CT value between 20 and 41 Hu whereas an enhanced scanning between 34 and 91 Hu [Figure 1]c. According to magnetic resonance imaging, patient four showed a weak T1W1 but strong T2W1 [Figure 1]d. Gastrointestinal examinations of patient 1–4 showed a space-occupying lesion to varying degrees in pelvic cavity (patient one) or abdomen (patient 2–4). Sigmoid colon and colon were depressed and dislodged in patient one whereas intestinum tenue and sigmoid colon depressed and dislodged in patient four. According to colonoscopy and cystoscopy, patient 5a's bladder and the opening of appendix got depressed. Renogram confirmed a partial blockage of ureters in patient four.
Figure 1: Diagnostic imaging results. (a) B-mode ultrasound; (b) computed tomography (plain scanning); (c) computed tomography (enhanced signal); (d) magnetic resonance imaging

Click here to view

Surgical resection

An extended surgical resection was performed in all patients in that the tumor mass had invaded the intestinal tissues. To ensure the tumor mass was completely removed, a section of intestine (>10 cm) from both side of the tumor mass was also removed. Histology confirmed that the tissue at the edge of resected intestine was free of tumor masses. A follow-up examination 1 year after the surgery showed that patient 5a suffered a recurrence of MF at the surgical site. The tumor mass was removed in a secondary surgical resection. The surgical details and follow-up record can be found in [Table 2].
Table 2: Surgical resection

Click here to view

 > Discussion Top

MF is a rare subtype of fibromatosis (2–4 cases per 1 million people annually), which usually occurs in the small intestine but occasionally in colon. It was reported that familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) might significantly increase the likelihood of fibromatosis.[3] The correlation between fibromatosis and FAP is further pronounced in patients with Gardner's syndrome.[4] Epidemiological study showed that MF could occur in patients aged between 1 and 60 with males accounting for 42%.[5] The histological signatures of fibromatosis include spindle cells with a homogeneous morphology, collagen deposition and invading borders. In contrast, gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) features spindle cells or epithelioid cells with a heterogeneous morphology and myxoid or hyalinized stroma.[6]

Clinically, MF lacks unique presenting features. Abdominal mass, pain and/or nephrological disorders are the most frequent complaints by MF patients. According to medical imaging results, MF can be categorized into four types based on their morphology, i.e., heterogeneous solid mass, homogeneous solid mass, cystic mass, and pervasive mass. Cystic features are usually present in masses of a large volume. If gas is observed in the mass, it suggests that the tumor has invaded into the lumen of the intestine.

At present histology and immunohistochemistry of tumor masses harvested during the surgery are the most reliable diagnostic means. Cells in the tumor mass showed a spindle-like morphology with significant collagen fibers [Figure 2]. Lymphocytes could also be observed in large tumor masses. MF tissue was vimentin ± β–catenin ± CD117/CD34, which can be used as the biomarkers for diagnostic purposes.[7],[8] Moreover, β–catenin has been used to distinguish MF from GIST or sclerosing mesenteritis.[9] Interestingly, clinical data showed that females were more prone than males to MF because of estrogen as a growth factor.[10] Previous studies suggested that an increased intake of estrogen might lead to the occurrence of MF.[11] On the other hand, menopause often predates the peak of MF growth. In addition, MF tumor masses were found to feature a higher concentration of estradiol receptors.[12] All these clinical data suggested a correlation between estrogen and MF, although the underlying mechanism remains elusive.
Figure 2: Histology of mesenteric fibromatosis tissues retrieved during the surgery

Click here to view

Surgical resection remains the gold standard treatment for MF. Given that MF frequently invades adjacent tissues, an extended resection is recommended. However, it must be noted that postoperative chemotherapy remains controversial. Moreover, tamoxifen, sulindac, and cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor can also be used to treat MF.

In summary, we reported a five-patient case study on MF with a comprehensive diagnostic and treatment results. Our findings suggested that estrogen level, vimentin, and β–catenin may be useful biomarkers for MF. In addition, an extended resection is recommended to minimize the chance of recurrence.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 > References Top

Al Jadaan SA, Al Rabeeah A Mesenteric fibromatosis: Case report and literature review. J Pediatr Surg 1999;34:1130-2.  Back to cited text no. 1
Murayama T, Imoto S, Ito M, Matsushita K, Matozaki S, Nakagawa T, et al. Mesenteric fibromatosis presenting as fever of unknown origin. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:1503-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
Okuno S. The enigma of desmoid tumors. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2006;7:438-43.  Back to cited text no. 3
Church J, Lynch C, Neary P, LaGuardia L, Elayi E. A desmoid tumor-staging system separates patients with intra-abdominal, familial adenomatous polyposis-associated desmoid disease by behavior and prognosis. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51:897-901.  Back to cited text no. 4
Meazza C, Bisogno G, Gronchi A, Fiore M, Cecchetto G, Alaggio R, et al. Aggressive fibromatosis in children and adolescents: The Italian experience. Cancer 2010;116:233-40.  Back to cited text no. 5
Stoidis CN, Spyropoulos BG, Misiakos EP, Fountzilas CK, Paraskeva PP, Fotiadis CI. Surgical treatment of giant mesenteric fibromatosis presenting as a gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A case report. J Med Case Rep 2010;4:314.  Back to cited text no. 6
Giuliani A, Demoro M, Ciardi A, Scimó M, Galati F, Lonardo MT, et al. Mesenteric fibromatosis. Case report. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2007;26:425-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
Monihan JM, Carr NJ, Sobin LH. CD34 immunoexpression in stromal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract and in mesenteric fibromatoses. Histopathology 1994;25:469-73.  Back to cited text no. 8
Montgomery E, Torbenson MS, Kaushal M, Fisher C, Abraham SC. Beta-catenin immunohistochemistry separates mesenteric fibromatosis from gastrointestinal stromal tumor and sclerosing mesenteritis. Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:1296-301.  Back to cited text no. 9
Bn A, Cd JK, Ps S, M M, Urs R. Giant aggressive mesenteric fibromatosis – A case report. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:PD07-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
Karakousis CP, Berjian RA, Lopez R, Rao U. Mesenteric fibromatosis in Gardner's syndrome. Arch Surg 1978;113:998-1000.  Back to cited text no. 11
Lath C, Khanna PC, Gadewar SB, Agrawal D. Inoperable aggressive mesenteric fibromatosis with ureteric fistula. Case report and literature review. Eur J Radiol 2006;59:117-21.  Back to cited text no. 12


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  >Abstract>Introduction>Case Report>Discussion>Article Figures>Article Tables
  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded102    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal