|
 
 |
| REVIEW ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2014 | Volume
: 10
| Issue : 4 | Page : 853-858 |
|
An overview of doxorubicin formulations in cancer therapy
Sangeeta Rivankar
Department of Research and Development, Bharat Serums and Vaccines Limited, R and D Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| Date of Web Publication | 9-Jan-2015 |
Correspondence Address:
Sangeeta Rivankar
Bharat Serums and Vaccines Limited, R and D Centre, DIL Complex, Near Tatwagyan Vidyapeeth, Ghodbunder Road, Thane West, Mumbai - 400 610, Maharashtra
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.139267
The burden of cancer is continuously increasing, and is rapidly becoming a global pandemic. The first liposomal encapsulated anticancer drug which received clinical approval against malignancies including solid tumours, transplantable leukemias and lymphomas was Doxorubicin HCl. This review is aimed at providing an overview of doxorubicin in cancer therapy. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin has a polyethylene glycol (PEG) layer around doxorubicin-containing liposome as the result of a process known as pegylation. Non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD) was developed to overcome the drawbacks associated with previous formulations. Nudoxa; (NPLD) with its unique drug delivery system offers the benefit of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin without hand foot syndrome as the major side effect. Future studies will be directed towards estimating the costs of treatment with the novel liposomal doxorubicin formulations in order to assess their widespread use and robustness in treating patients with cancer. 阿霉素制剂对肿瘤治疗的综述
摘要
癌症负担不断增加，并迅速成为一个流行性疾病。第一个临床被批准临床应用的是阿霉素脂质体，治疗恶性肿瘤包括实体瘤，白血病和淋巴瘤。本文综述阿霉素对肿瘤的治疗。聚乙二醇脂质体阿霉素的聚乙二醇（PEG）层包裹脂质体阿霉素的过程称为聚乙二醇化。非聚乙二醇脂质体阿霉素（NPLD）的开发是为了克服以前的配方相关的缺陷。nudoxa®（NPLD）以其独特的药物传递系统使聚乙二醇化脂质体阿霉素克服了手足综合征的主要副作用。未来的研究应评估新型脂质体阿霉素制剂治疗的成本，以及在广泛应用中的安全性。
关键词：脂质体，非聚乙二醇化，非聚乙二醇脂质体阿霉素，聚乙二醇化 Keywords: Liposomal, nonpegylated, nudoxa, pegylated
How to cite this article:
Rivankar S. An overview of doxorubicin formulations in cancer therapy. J Can Res Ther 2014;10:853-8 |
| > Introduction | |  |
Cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is estimated that there will be 13.1 million deaths due to cancer in 2030. [1] Anthracyclines, especially doxorubicin, have been the mainstay of cancer therapy since long. Despite its broad-spectrum antineoplastic activity [Table 1], adverse events [Table 2], particularly cardiotoxicity, has limited the use of conventional doxorubicin in clinical practice. [2] This was especially so in patients with advanced disease requiring dose escalation. [3]
Doxorubicin hydrochloride (HCl) liposomal injection was the first liposomal encapsulated anticancer drug to receive clinical approval and has activity against a number of malignancies including solid tumors, transplantable leukemias, and lymphomas. [4]
Previous clinical studies have focused on the lower toxicity and better tolerability of liposomal anticancer drugs. [4] However, in recent years, research has focused on developing novel liposomal formulations. This review is aimed at providing an overview of doxorubicin in cancer therapy.
| > History of doxorubicin | | |
The quest for anticancer compounds from soil-based microorganisms began in the 1950s. A new strain of Streptomyces peucetius, which produced a bright red pigment, was isolated, and an antibiotic was produced from this bacterium that was found to have good activity against mouse tumors. The new compound was named daunorubicin and was used successfully in the treatment of acute leukemia and lymphoma [5],[6] . However, by 1967, it was recognized that daunorubicin could produce fatal cardiac toxicity. [7]
Researches made genetic modifications to the Streptomyces spp. to produce a compound, Adriamycin, which was later called doxorubicin. Though doxorubicin had a higher therapeutic index cardiotoxicity continued to be a major problem. These compounds have been prototypes for subsequent research and today there are approximately more than 2000 known analogs of doxorubicin.
| > Mechanism of action of doxorubicin | | |
The exact mechanism of action of doxorubicin is complex and still unclear. Doxorubicin interacts with the DNA by intercalation thus, inhibiting macromolecular biosynthesis. [8],[9] This further inhibits the progression of the enzyme topoisomerase II, and relaxes supercoils in DNA for transcription. Doxorubicin stabilizes the topoisomerase II complex after it has broken the DNA chain for replication, preventing the DNA double helix from being resealed and thereby stopping the process of replication [Figure 1]. Another mechanism of doxorubicin HCl is its ability to generate free radicals that induce DNA and cell membrane damage.
| > Doxorubicin in cancer therapy | | |
Doxorubicin is most commonly used to treat cancers of the bladder, breast, stomach, lung, ovaries, thyroid, soft tissue sarcoma, multiple myeloma, and Hodgkin's lymphoma. The commonly used doxorubicin-containing regimens may include Adriamycin, cyclophosphamide (AC), Taxotere, AC, Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine, bleomycin, etoposide, AC, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone, cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and 5-fluorouracil, AC. Doxil is mainly used for the treatment of ovarian cancer where it has progressed or recurred after platinum-based chemotherapy, or for the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma. [10]
| > Cardiotoxicity associated with conventional doxorubicin | | |
The cardiotoxicity associated with conventional doxorubicin is broadly classified as either acute or chronic. [11],[12],[13] It is a major concern during therapy as it may be dose-limiting. Risk factors that may increase the occurrence of cardiotoxicity include previous or current heart disease, extremes in age, race, exposure to irradiation in the mediastinal region and the cumulative dose of doxorubicin received. Patients with acute doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity usually present with rhythm disturbances, abnormal electrocardiographic changes, and acute, but reversible, reductions in left-ventricular ejection fraction. In general, these symptoms occur within 24 h of infusion, are self-limiting, and do not appear to increase the risk of future cardiac events. Cardiotoxicity, a consequence of conventional doxorubicin treatment manifests as a chronic complication, which ultimately results in congestive cardiomyopathy. Such toxicity has been shown to correlate with peak plasma doxorubicin concentrations, as well as with the lifetime cumulative dose administered. [14],[15] Historically, cardiomyopathy has rarely been observed with cumulative doses of conventional doxorubicin below 450 mg/m 2 ; however, studies suggest that doxorubicin-induced congestive heart failure (CHF) may occur at lower-doses and with greater frequency than previously noted. [16],[17] Von Hoff et al.[16] reported incidence of conventional doxorubicin-induced CHF of approximately 3% at cumulative dose of 400 mg/m 2 , increasing to 7% at 550 mg/m 2 and to 18% at 700 mg/m 2 .
| > Rationale for the development of novel doxorubicin formulations | | |
Several efforts have been made to improve the toxicity profile of conventional anthracyclines, including the development of novel anthracycline analogs, the use of low-dose, prolonged, continuous infusion schedules; co-administration with the cardioprotective agent dexrazoxane; and the use of liposomal encapsulation technology. [12],[18],[19]
The therapy-limiting toxicity for this drug is cardiomyopathy, which may lead to CHF and death. An approach to ameliorating doxorubicin-related toxicity is to use drug carriers, which engender a change in the pharmacological distribution of the drug, resulting in reduced drug levels in the heart. Examples of these carrier systems include lipid-based (liposome) formulations that effect a beneficial change in doxorubicin. Liposomal encapsulation represents the most successful strategy to date for increasing the therapeutic index of conventional anthracyclines. Liposomal drug-delivery systems have been studied extensively to increase the therapeutic index of chemotherapy. The development of liposomal anthracyclines was based on the rationale that liposomes cannot escape the vascular space in areas with tight capillary junctions (heart muscle) but can leave the circulation in tissues and organs lined with cells that are not tightly joined (tumor cells). [20] Thus, liposomal encapsulation results in the preferential concentration of anthracyclines in tumor tissue, while limiting exposure in those sites most frequently associated with conventional anthracycline toxicity, such as the myocardium.
| > Liposomal formulations of doxorubicin | | |
Due to the side-effects of conventional doxorubicin therapy, a need for development of liposomal formulation with equal efficacy and less side-effects arose. One of the main advantages of using liposomes as a delivery system is that the phospholipids used to form these vesicles are extracted from natural sources such as egg yolks or soybean and hence they are safe in the body. In addition, the degree of saturation of phospholipid bilayer can be modified to alter the drug release rate.
Liposomes, composed of natural phospholipids mixed with varying amounts of cholesterol are removed from circulation by the reticuloendothelial system (RES) within a few minutes to a few hours, subsequent to the acquisition of opsonins from plasma. Because of this short circulation half-life, the use of conventional liposomes has limited clinical applications.
| > Pegylated liposomal formulations of doxorubicin | | |
The fact that some polymers, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG), ganglioside, and cerebroside sulfate are able to inhibit opsonization of the liposomes by plasma proteins and increase the half-life of liposomal drugs has renewed activity in the area of liposomal drug-delivery systems. Prolonged circulation of liposomes has been linked to better therapeutic efficacy of liposomal anthracyclines, possibly related to increased accumulation of drug loaded liposomes in tumor tissue.
A further advancement in this line of treatment was the pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin (such as Doxil® /Caelyx® ), a unique form of liposomal doxorubicin, in which the liposomes were coated with PEG in a process known as pegylation. This prevents drug uptake by the RES, thereby prolonging the circulation time (half-life: 3-4 days [21] vs. 30 h for conventional doxorubicin [22] ) beyond that of conventional liposomes and enabling the drug to remain encapsulated until it reaches the tumor site. [23],[24]
Doxil® is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of ovarian cancer after failure of first line platinum-based chemotherapy and multiple myeloma. Outside the United States, Doxil® is known as Caelyx® and is marketed by Janssen. [25] However, there is some evidence that raises doubts on the benefits of pegylation in cancer treatment. PEG is a large molecule and its presence on the liposomal surface may decrease the interactions of liposomes with cells and impede the entry of liposomes into the tumor tissue. [26] This may possibly reduce the accumulation of liposomal drugs in the tumor tissue. A study assessing the accumulation of liposomal doxorubicin in murine Lewis lung carcinoma showed that benefits with PEG liposomal doxorubicin, such as increased blood levels and circulation time may be of little advantage when compared to maximizing drug accumulation in tumors. [27]
However, pegylated-liposomal doxorubicins cause dose-limiting hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia) characterized by skin eruptions on the palms of the hand and/or soles of the feet, leading to interruption in therapy by at least 2 weeks and decrease in subsequent dosage by 25% (Doxil Product Information Leaflet). The incidence of HFS has been observed in approximately 50% of patients dosed at 50 mg/m 2 (Doxil Product Information leaflet).
Though Caelyx® /Doxil® (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) has high affinity for the skin and a very long circulation time, a major limitation is dose-limiting HFS (palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia). [28]
| > Nonpegylated liposomal formulations of doxorubicin | | |
There remains a need for stable, long circulating liposomes that do not cause such deleterious effects such as the HFS. The new variant of liposomal doxorubicin, nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD), has a unique drug-delivery system, and provides a breakthrough in cancer therapy by offering the benefits of pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin without its major side-effects such as HFS.
Nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin injection provides a better safety profile than not only conventional doxorubicin, but also Doxil® /Caelyx® . NPLD not only reduces the cardiac toxicity associated with doxorubicin, but also the dose-limiting toxicity associated with the use of Doxil® /Caelyx® , such as HFS. This is achieved by a combination of (1) specific composition and (2) a unique manufacturing process (both which have been patented) of the NPLD's liposome, which gives it the desired physicochemical properties.
The NPLDs have an increased circulation time and less cardiotoxicity as compared with conventional doxorubicin. Since NPLDs do not have PEG coating, they are not associated with the painful HFS, which is a dose-limiting adverse event with PEG-doxorubicin.
Myocet® is a NPLD manufactured by Enzon Pharmaceuticals for Cephalon in Europe and for Sopherion Therapeutics in the United States and Canada. [29] Myocet® is approved in Europe and Canada for treatment of metastatic breast cancer in combination with cyclophosphamide. [30] However, it is under the process for the US FDA approval. Three Phase III trials in breast cancer evaluated Myocet® in comparison with standard doxorubicin and epirubicin. Compared to standard doxorubicin, Myocet® demonstrated less cardiotoxicity with no loss of efficacy. Equal doses of epirubicin and Myocet® were as effective with no significant difference in cardiotoxicity. Another limitation of Myocet® is related to its administration which is presented as a three-vial system; Myocet doxorubicin HCl, Myocet liposomes and Myocet buffer. In addition, a small amount of 0.9% sodium chloride for injection is needed, which is not provided in the package. The constituted product is a liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin-citrate complex. [31] Further, the high cost of Myocet® has been a hindrance in its widespread use. This has been a limitation in its robust assessment within the treatment pathway for advanced cancers.
Nudoxa® (NPLD) with its unique drug-delivery system is a breakthrough in cancer therapy as it offers the benefit of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin without its major side-effects like HFS. Further, it decreased the toxicity and other adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, and alopecia. Nudoxa® was jointly developed by Zydus and Bharat Serums and Vaccines Pvt. Limited Nudoxa® is being used as a chemotherapy drug to treat various cancers, such as breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma. The formulation uses distearoyl-phosphatidylcholine, a phospholipid with high phase transition temperature, which increases the retention of the liposomal content. This allows the doxorubicin HCl liposomes to circulate for prolonged periods in the bloodstream. Liposomes are small enough (average diameter of approximately 100 nm) to pass intact (extravasate) through the defective blood vessels present in the tumors. The liposomal covering helps the drug from escaping into the body's immune system thereby enabling the drug to reach malignant cells. This results in reduction of harmful side-effects owing to minimized distribution of the drug to nontargeted tissues. The preclinical studies were aimed at comparing Nudoxa® with PEG liposomal doxorubicin and conventional doxorubicin (data on file). Nudoxa® has demonstrated favorable toxicity profile in animal models. Further, it offers an advantage over pegylated liposomal doxorubicin due to the absence of HFS. Maximum tolerated dose for Nudoxa® has been established at 70 mg/m 2 in Phase I clinical trials (data on file).
Nudoxa® was launched in the Indian market in 2008 and is being used as a chemotherapy drug to treat various cancers, particularly, breast cancer, ovarian cancer and AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma. A Phase II/III open label multicentric randomized trial determined the safety and efficacy of Nudoxa® at two different dose levels as compared to doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The trial reported that Nudoxa® at 70 mg/m 2 was as efficacious as conventional doxorubicin with a better safety profile (CTRI/2009/091/1000795).
| > Other novel formulations of doxorubicin | | |
Stealth liposomes have gained an important place in cancer chemotherapy, but still these liposomes are modulated in terms of their selectivity for tumors by attachment of ligands. [32] Antibody coated liposome (immunoliposomes) are extensively studied where either an antibody is attached directly to liposome phospholipid head group or to the terminus of PEG polymer. [33] Temperature sensitive liposomes are also fabricated for tumor targeting. Similarly, acid triggered, enzyme triggered and light triggered release are being studied for delivery of doxorubicin. Other case of active targeting are sulfatide-mediated liposome [34] and folate receptor targeting. [35] Block co-polymers of poly (ethylene oxide)-poly (propylene oxide) block copolymers (pluronics) have also being developed for doxorubicin. Hydroxyapatite implants containing doxorubicin have been developed and tested in in vivo model for osteogenic sarcoma. [36] Thermosensitive poly (organophosphazenes) hydrogels containing doxorubicin have also been studied. The release of loaded doxorubicin from the polymer hydrogel was significantly sustained over 20 days. Oral delivery of microgels composed of pluronics was found to be active against Caco-2 cells. [37] Biological particles like resealed erythrocytes and bacterial ghosts are being explored for the delivery of doxorubicin are also proving to be quite effective. [38] Nanoparticles prepared using polybutylcyanoacrylate as delivery system for doxorubicin to target liver cancer have been studied. [39] The findings suggested that drug was released slowly in liver during detection period in treatment groups. Nanoparticles in range of 100-150 nm diameter range had the best liver targeting characteristics. It also decreased doxorubicin distribution in other tissues such as heart, kidney, and lung. Poly (butylcyanoacrylate) nanoparticles coated with polysorbate 80 considerably enhance the antitumor effect of doxorubicin against an intracranial glioblastoma in rats. [40]
Doxorubicin-loaded polymer-lipid hybrid nanoparticles were formulated and evaluated in a murine solid tumor model. [41] A new bioadhesive drug-delivery system, poly (d, l-lactide-co-glycolide/montmorillonite nanoparticles were developed for oral delivery of paclitaxel. Such a novel formulation is expected to possess extended residence time in the gastrointestinal tract, which promotes oral delivery of paclitaxel. [42]
Among the novel formulations, only the liposomal doxorubicin formulations have been extensively studied and explored in clinical trials in patients with different stages of cancer.
| > Conclusion | | |
Conventional doxorubicin has been a mainstay of treatment for breast and ovarian cancers. Although the use of conventional doxorubicin has been somewhat limited by its adverse effects, recent efforts have markedly improved its safety and tolerability. Until date, the most successful strategy for improving the therapeutic index of conventional doxorubicin formulations has been liposomal encapsulation, which results in preferential accumulation of drug within the tumor site to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin has demonstrated efficacy in ovarian cancer patients who have failed platinum and paclitaxel therapies, as well as in metastatic breast cancer. However, dose-limiting HFS limits its usage. Nudoxa® is a NPLD, in which doxorubicin is confined in nonpegylated liposomes. Safety and efficacy of Nudoxa® has been established in several preclinical studies (data on file). Currently Nudoxa® is being studied in clinical trials to establish its safety and efficacy in different types of cancers. The early results show that Nudoxa® is as efficacious as conventional doxorubicin with a better safety profile. This may present an improved treatment regimen for late stage cancer patients.
With established efficacy and safety profiles, future studies will hopefully be directed toward estimating the costs of treatment with the novel liposomal doxorubicin formulations in order to assess their widespread use and robustness in treating patients with cancer.
| > References | | |
| 1. | |
| 2. | Thigpen JT. Innovations in anthracycline therapy: Overview. Commun Oncol 2005;2:3-7.  |
| 3. | Theodoulou M, Hudis C. Cardiac profiles of liposomal anthracyclines: Greater cardiac safety versus conventional doxorubicin? Cancer 2004;100:2052-63. |
| 4. | Slingerland M, Guchelaar HJ, Gelderblom H. Liposomal drug formulations in cancer therapy: 15 years along the road. Drug Discov Today 2012;17:160-6. |
| 5. | Brockmann H. Anthracyclinones and anthracyclines. (Rhodomycinone, pyrromycinone and their glycosides). Fortschr Chem Org Naturst 1963;21:121-82. |
| 6. | Arcamone F, Cassinelli G, Fantini G, Grein A, Orezzi P, Pol C, et al. Adriamycin, 14-hydroxydaunomycin, a new antitumor antibiotic from S. peucetius var. caesius. Biotechnol Bioeng 1969;11:1101-10. |
| 7. | |
| 8. | Fornari FA, Randolph JK, Yalowich JC, Ritke MK, Gewirtz DA. Interference by doxorubicin with DNA unwinding in MCF-7 breast tumor cells. Mol Pharmacol 1994;45:649-56. |
| 9. | Momparler RL, Karon M, Siegel SE, Avila F. Effect of adriamycin on DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis in cell-free systems and intact cells. Cancer Res 1976;36:2891-5. |
| 10. | |
| 11. | Balmer C, Valley AW. Basic principles of cancer treatment and cancer chemotherapy. In: DiPiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC, Matzke GR, Wells BG, Posey LM, editors. Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach. 3 rd ed. Stamford, Conn: Appleton and Lange; 1997. p. 2403-65. |
| 12. | Waterhouse DN, Tardi PG, Mayer LD, Bally MB. A comparison of liposomal formulations of doxorubicin with drug administered in free form: Changing toxicity profiles. Drug Saf 2001;24:903-20. |
| 13. | Pai VB, Nahata MC. Cardiotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents: Incidence, treatment and prevention. Drug Saf 2000;22:263-302. |
| 14. | Maluf FC, Spriggs D. Anthracyclines in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 2002;85:18-31. |
| 15. | Hortobágyi GN. Anthracyclines in the treatment of cancer. An overview. Drugs 1997;54:1-7. |
| 16. | Von Hoff DD, Layard MW, Basa P, Davis HL Jr, Von Hoff AL, Rozencweig M, et al. Risk factors for doxorubicin-induced congestive heart failure. Ann Intern Med 1979;91:710-7. |
| 17. | Swain SM, Whaley FS, Ewer MS. Congestive heart failure in patients treated with doxorubicin: A retrospective analysis of three trials. Cancer 2003;97:2869-79. |
| 18. | Birtle AJ. Anthracyclines and cardiotoxicity. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2000;12:146-52. |
| 19. | Seymour L, Bramwell V, Moran LA. Use of dexrazoxane as a cardioprotectant in patients receiving doxorubicin or epirubicin chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer. The Provincial Systemic Treatment Disease Site Group. Cancer Prev Control 1999;3:145-59. |
| 20. | Tardi PG, Boman NL, Cullis PR. Liposomal doxorubicin. J Drug Target 1996;4:129-40. |
| 21. | Hilger RA, Richly H, Grubert M, Oberhoff C, Strumberg D, Scheulen ME, et al. Pharmacokinetics (PK) of a liposomal encapsulated fraction containing doxorubicin and of doxorubicin released from the liposomal capsule after intravenous infusion of Caelyx/Doxil. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005;43:588-9. |
| 22. | Twelves CJ, Dobbs NA, Aldhous M, Harper PG, Rubens RD, Richards MA. Comparative pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin given by three different schedules with equal dose intensity in patients with breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1991;28:302-7. |
| 23. | Gabizon A, Martin F. Polyethylene glycol-coated (pegylated) liposomal doxorubicin. Rationale for use in solid tumours. Drugs 1997;54 Suppl 4:15-21. |
| 24. | Gabizon A, Catane R, Uziely B, Kaufman B, Safra T, Cohen R, et al. Prolonged circulation time and enhanced accumulation in malignant exudates of doxorubicin encapsulated in polyethylene-glycol coated liposomes. Cancer Res 1994;54:987-92. |
| 25. | |
| 26. | Hong RL, Huang CJ, Tseng YL, Pang VF, Chen ST, Liu JJ, et al. Direct comparison of liposomal doxorubicin with or without polyethylene glycol coating in C-26 tumor-bearing mice: Is surface coating with polyethylene glycol beneficial? Clin Cancer Res 1999;5:3645-52. |
| 27. | Parr MJ, Masin D, Cullis PR, Bally MB. Accumulation of liposomal lipid and encapsulated doxorubicin in murine lewis lung carcinoma: The lack of beneficial effects by coating liposomes with poly (ethylene glycol). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997;280:1319-27. |
| 28. | Park JW. Liposome-based drug delivery in breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res 2002;4:95-9. |
| 29. | |
| 30. | |
| 31. | |
| 32. | Immordino ML, Dosio F, Cattel L. Stealth liposomes: Review of the basic science, rationale, and clinical applications, existing and potential. Int J Nanomedicine 2006;1:297-315. |
| 33. | Schnyder A, Huwyler J. Drug transport to brain with targeted liposomes. NeuroR×2005;2:99-107. |
| 34. | Shao K, Hou Q, Duan W, Go ML, Wong KP, Li QT. Intracellular drug delivery by sulfatide-mediated liposomes to gliomas. J Control Release 2006;115:150-7. |
| 35. | Saul JM, Annapragada A, Natarajan JV, Bellamkonda RV. Controlled targeting of liposomal doxorubicin via the folate receptor in vitro. J Control Release 2003;92:49-67. |
| 36. | Itokazu M, Kumazawa S, Wada E, Wenyi Y. Sustained release of adriamycin from implanted hydroxyapatite blocks for the treatment of experimental osteogenic sarcoma in mice. Cancer Lett 1996;107:11-8. |
| 37. | Bromberg L, Alakhov V. Effects of polyether-modified poly (acrylic acid) microgels on doxorubicin transport in human intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cell layers. J Control Release 2003;88:11-22. |
| 38. | Zocchi E, Tonetti M, Polvani C, Guida L, Benatti U, De Flora A. Encapsulation of doxorubicin in liver-targeted erythrocytes increases the therapeutic index of the drug in a murine metastatic model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989;86:2040-4. |
| 39. | Olivier JC. Drug transport to brain with targeted nanoparticles. NeuroRx 2005;2:108-19. |
| 40. | Petri B, Bootz A, Khalansky A, Hekmatara T, Müller R, Uhl R, et al. Chemotherapy of brain tumour using doxorubicin bound to surfactant-coated poly (butyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles: Revisiting the role of surfactants. J Control Release 2007;117:51-8. |
| 41. | Wong HL, Rauth AM, Bendayan R, Wu XY. In vivo evaluation of a new polymer-lipid hybrid nanoparticle (PLN) formulation of doxorubicin in a murine solid tumor model. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2007;65:300-8. |
| 42. | Dong Y, Feng SS. Poly (d, l-lactide-co-glycolide)/montmorillonite nanoparticles for oral delivery of anticancer drugs. Biomaterials 2005;26:6068-76. |
[Figure 1]
[Table 1], [Table 2]
|
Search Pubmed for