Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 387-391

The role of mast cells and angiogenesis in well-differentiated oral squamous cell carcinoma

1 Department of Morbid Anatomy and Histopathology, University of Health Sciences Lahore, Pakistan
2 Department of Pathology, Quaid-e-Azam Medical College Bahawalpur, Pakistan
3 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Punjab Dental College/Allied Hospital Faisalabad, Pakistan

Date of Web Publication8-Oct-2013

Correspondence Address:
Ehsan Ullah
Department of Pathology, Quaid-e-Azam Medical College Bahawalpur
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.119311

Rights and Permissions
 > Abstract 

Objective: Neo-vascularization is vital for an expansion and metastasis of a tumor and is influenced by a number of mediators. Mast cells are believed to release many pro-angiogenic mediators that may help in tumor expansion and invasion. This study describes the role of mast cells and angiogenesis in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).
Study Design: It was a prospective study in which 37 biopsies of well-differentiated OSCC were obtained. Micro-vessels were stained with cluster of differentiation (CD)-34 and mast cells were counted using the Toluidine blue stain.
Results: When compared to normal oral mucosal tissue, it was seen that micro-vessel density and mast cell density indeed increases significantly in squamous cell carcinoma; however, they are not correlated to each other.
Conclusion: This study reports that angiogenesis does increase in OSCC and mast cells also invade the peri-tumor tissue, but they are not directly correlated.

Keywords: Angiogenesis, mast cells, oral cancer, squamous cell carcinoma

How to cite this article:
Tahir A, Nagi AH, Ullah E, Janjua OS. The role of mast cells and angiogenesis in well-differentiated oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Can Res Ther 2013;9:387-91

How to cite this URL:
Tahir A, Nagi AH, Ullah E, Janjua OS. The role of mast cells and angiogenesis in well-differentiated oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Can Res Ther [serial online] 2013 [cited 2021 Oct 24];9:387-91. Available from: https://www.cancerjournal.net/text.asp?2013/9/3/387/119311

 > Introduction Top

More than 95% of the total intra-oral carcinomas in the developing countries are squamous cell carcinomas and are a leading cause of death. [1] Oral cancer is the sixth most common cancer world-wide and the regions characterized by the high incidence rates include South and South-east Asian countries (e.g., Sri Lanka, India, Pakistan, and Taiwan). [2] It is also the most common cancer in India forming 94% of all oral malignancies. [3] Hence, it remains a serious problem of oral health world-wide.

Mast cells are well-known to be involved in allergic, inflammatory, and immune reactions. In addition, they are also involved in pain, tissue damage as well as repair. However, in the recent past, mast cells have proven to be related to cancer and mediate their effect through release of many cytokines and chemokines, pro-angiogenic factors and via heparin release. [4],[5] Therefore, mast cell function in developing tumors is being extensively investigated world-wide. The role of mast cells has already been studied in many pathological conditions and malignancies such as adenomatous polyps, colorectal cancers, malignant melanoma, oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), skin dysplasias multiple myeloma, and many other tumors. [6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14] The increased number of mast cells alone cannot be correlated with the stage and prognosis of tumor. An increased mast cell count may be the result of tumor invasiveness; on the other hand, these mast cells may elicit tumor progression. [5]

Some studies suggest the pro-angiogenic and thus pro-tumourigenic role of mast cells in OSCC, whereas some studies do not support this theory. [8],[9],[10],[11],[12] This study shall evaluate the role of mast cells and angiogenesis in OSCC and the findings of this study can prove to be helpful in determining the prognosis and treatment modalities of OSCC in future.

 > Materials and Methods Top

Sample size was calculated by using the P.A.S.S 2008 (Power analysis and sample size software) and 37 formalin-fixed oral biopsies of OSCC were obtained. After gross examination, paraffin embedded tissue sections were made. Following H and E based diagnosis and grading in each case, micro-vessel density (MVD) was assessed by using the monoclonal anti-human CD-34 class II antibody. The numerical mast cell density (MCD) was determined by staining the tissue slides with toluidine blue. All the primary tumors of histologically diagnosed OSCC were included from both sexes and all ages. However, patients those were immune-compromised or on radio/chemo-therapy or undergoing any treatment that effects mast cells and metastatic tumors were excluded. Normal tissues were obtained from non-inflamed subgingival tissue of patients undergoing minor oral surgeries after patient's consent.

The recorded clinical data included age, gender, and intra-oral location of tumor, clinical presentation and type of biopsy performed. Recorded histopathologic data included the grade of tumor, microscopic evidence of ulceration, blood vessel, lymphatic, and neural invasion.

From each paraffin block, three tissue sections each 4 μm thick were cut on three different slides for hematoxylin and eosin stain, CD-34 antibody and toluidine blue stain respectively.

Determination of Micro-vessel Density


Immuno-histochemistry was carried out to determine the numerical MVD. A paraffin embedded tissue section of 3-5 μm thickness was taken from each block on super-frosted slides after coating them with Poly-L-lysine. These sectioned were reacted with mouse monoclonal anti-CD34 antibody (CD34, Mouse Monoclonal antibody, Clone QBend/10, Isotype Immunoglobulin type G-1 (IgG1), Localization membranous, provided by BioSB, Santa Barbara USA) using avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method. Counter-staining with hematoxylin was carried out and slides were dehydrated and mounted with cover-slips using the DPX mounting medium.

Interpretations of Immunohistochemistry

Five microscopic high power fields (HPFs) at ×400 with the largest number of micro-vessels adjacent to the invading tumor margins were observed in each case. The microvascular density (angiogenesis) was determined by counting the mean numbers of small blood vessels lined by endothelial cells, individual endothelial cells or their clusters separated from neighboring micro-vessel immunoreactive to CD34 antibody per HPF.

Determination of MCD

Toluidine blue staining

After following the same initial steps as for Hematoxylin and Eosin staining, the sections were immersed in toluidine blue working solution for 2-3 min and washed in distilled water, for three changes. They were then dehydrated quickly through 90% and two changes of 100% alcohol (10 dips each since stain fades quickly in alcohol). Sections were then cleared in xylene, two changes, and 3 min each and mounted with DPX mounting medium.

As the mast cell cytoplasm contains granules (metachromatic) composed of heparin and histamine. Toluidine blue stains mast cells red-purple (metachromatic staining) and the background blue (orthochromatic staining).

Interpretation of toluidine blue staining

Three HPFs containing the largest number of mast cells adjacent to tumor invasive margins were selected and mast cells were counted and their measure that is MCD was given as the number of mast cells seen per HPF (at ×400).

 > Results Top

Mean age of patients of OSCC was 54.30 ± 1.561 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51.13-57.46) in a range of 32-80 years. Out of the 37 cases of OSCC, 20 (54.1%) were males while 17 (45.9%) were females. Mean age of male patients was 55.05 ± 2.336 (95% CI: 50.16-59.94) and female patients was 53.41 ± 2.053 (95% CI: 49.06-57.76). The most frequent location of the tumor in the oral cavity was buccal mucosa (32.4%), followed by tongue (21.6%), palate (10.8%) and lower lip (10.8%) as shown in [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Site-wise distribution of oral squamous cell carcinoma

Click here to view

OSCC presented in various clinical forms such as ulcer, induration leukoplakia, erythroplakia, erythro-leukoplakia, and fungating growth. The most common clinical presentation of OSCC was as non-healing indurated ulcer (51.4%) and it was significantly common on the buccal mucosa (P = 0.001).

On microscopic examination, all 37 cases were diagnosed as well-differentiated squamous cell carcinomas. 45.9% cases showed microscopic evidence of ulceration and 10.8% showed vascular invasion. Vascular invasion was insignificantly associated with gender of patients (P = 0.367), location of the tumor (P = 0.156), clinical type of lesion (P = 0.529) or with microscopic evidence of ulceration (P = 0.242).

Mean MVD in 5 normal tissues was found to be 9.20 ± 0.860/HPF, whereas mean MVD in 37 cases of OSCC was 25.84 ± 1.525/HPF as shown in [Figure 2]. The number of micro-vessels was significantly increased in OSCC (P = 0.0001). Mean MCD in normal tissues was 1.00 ± 0.316/HPF, whereas in 37 cases of OSCC it was 10.08 ± 0.909/HPF as shown in [Figure 3]. The number of mast cells also increased significantly in OSCC (P = 0.001) as shown in [Table 1]. However, by applying Pearson correlation, the MVD was found to be insignificantly correlated with the MCD (r = −0.053, P = 0.754). Similarly, by applying the power curve fit model, no significance was found (P = 0.828) as shown in [Figure 4].
Figure 2: Microvessel density in oral squamous cell carcinoma (CD 34, × 400)

Click here to view
Figure 3: Mast cells in oral squamous cell carcinoma (Toluidine blue, × 400)

Click here to view
Figure 4: Power curve fit model showing no significant relation between mast cell count and microvessel density

Click here to view
Table 1: Comparison of mast cells and angiogenesis between normal oral mucosa and OSCC

Click here to view

 > Discussion Top

Mast cells exert their tumorigenic effect through four mechanisms, i.e., (1) immunosupression (2) angiogenesis (3) degradation of extracellular matrix and (4) mitogenesis. [8] Among these, angiogenesis plays a vital role in tumor growth. In order to outgrow the size of 2 cubic mm, solid tumors need oxygen supply and angiogenesis is necessary to remove waste products and to provide nutrition and immune cells to the growing tumor. [15],[16] Angiogenesis is an early event in tumorigenesis and is found in many pre-malignant conditions such as gastric dysplasia, carcinoma in situ of breast, atypical adenoma of colon, and oral leukoplakia with dysplasia. [10],[17]

Mast cells are highly granulated bone marrow derived cells and secrete many pro-angiogenic factors such as angiopoitin-1, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF), Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-4 (MCP-4) (chymase) and histamine and there is impressive evidence of pro-angiogenic and thus pro-tumor role of mast cells. [5],[18],[19],[20],[21] VEGF has been shown to be significantly increased in premalignant and invasive oral lesions. [22] However, in some tumors such as breast cancer, mast cells seem to play anti-tumor effects and represent a favorable prognosis, whereas, in some tumors such as non-small cell lung carcinoma the role of mast cells is still controversial. [23]

To evaluate the role of mast cells in OSCC, 37 biopsies were collected. Mean age was found to be 54.30 ± 1.561 (95% CI: 51.13-57.46), which is in consistence with other studies conducted in Punjab, Pakistan in which the mean age of patients with OSCC was shown to be 51 and 53 years. [24],[25] However, two other studies conducted in Sindh, Pakistan showed a comparatively younger age group showing average age of 49.47 ± 9.28 and 46.28. [26],[27] This may be due to increase the prevalence of tobacco, pan and betel nuts in Sindh. [27] Other studies world-wide have shown mean age to be around 60 years. [10],[28] Our study shows almost equal incidence of OSCC among males and females, which is the same as shown by Bhurgri and Keski-Santti et al., [25],[29] Some studies have also shown a male predominance. [10],[30] The most common sub-site of OSCC in oral cavity is buccal mucosa according to this study, which is also consistent with some other studies in Pakistan. [25],[26] While different studies world-wide have shown different most commonly involved intra-oral sites such as mandibular alveolus and lip vermillion, the incidence of oral cancer of buccal mucosa seems to be increasing in our region, which is a cause of concern because of its worst prognosis as shown by Lin et al.[10],[31]

In our study, the average MCD in 37 cases of OSCC was 10.08 ± 0.909/HPF, which is significantly higher than mean MCD 1.00 ± 0.316/HPF found in normal oral mucosa obtained from gingiva and alveolus (P = 0.001). This finding is very close to the findings of a Greek study in which the average MCD in 30 cases of OSCC was 9.33 ± 6.26/HPF. [10] Similarly, in our study the mean micro-vessel density in OSCC was 25.84 ± 1.525/HPF, which is again significantly higher than mean MVD found in normal oral mucosa 9.20 ± 0.860/HPF with P value = 0.0001. These findings are also very similar to the findings by Michailiduo et al., in which the mean MCD in 30 cases of OSCC was 9.33 ± 6.26/HPF and mean MVD was 24.78 ± 8.1/HPF with similar significance values. [10] A recently conducted Indian study found the mean MCD in well- differentiated OSCC to be 12.85, which is slightly higher than our findings and the mean micro-vessel density in their study was 51.55 in well-differentiated, 90.15 in moderate and 164.25 in poorly differentiated OSCC, which are quite higher than the mean MVD found in our study. [11] This difference may be explained by the difference of tumor markers used, which was a mouse monoclonal anti-human CD34 class II antibody in our study and study by Michailiduo et al., whereas, anti-collagen type IV antibody was used by Kalra et al.

Our study found that the mean MVD and mean MCD were insignificantly correlated with each other despite their significant rise is OSCC. Interestingly, this finding is in contrast with the study by Michailiduo et al., in which their correlation was found to be significant, whereas, the study in India by Kalra et al., found the correlation to be inverse, which stresses the need for further research on the role of mast cells and angiogenesis in oral cancer. Moreover, most studies show that the micro-vessels and mast cells do rise significantly in malignant oral mucosa, which can define the future therapeutic approach toward its treatment and also might play a role toward the prognosis of pre-malignant lesions. The difference in results of various studies could be attributed to the difference of immune-markers and stains used. Tryptase immunostaining is believed to be the precise staining for human mast cell detection, but most studies including our study have used toluidine blue stain. Another factor could be the degranulation of mast cells at a given point of time. However, our study shows that the process of angio-genesis has no correlation with MCD that is the pro-angiogenic factors are not necessarily released by mast cells only. Increased mast cells in these tumors can be the result of increased angiogenesis and further research with larger sample sizes is needed to conclude their role in OSCC.

 > Conclusion Top

According to this study, the MCD and micro-vessel density are significantly increased in OSCC, but are not correlated to each other.

 > References Top

1.Mehrotra R, Yadav S. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: Etiology, pathogenesis and prognostic value of genomic alterations. Indian J Cancer 2006;43:60-66.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.Warnakulasuriya S. Global epidemiology of oral and oro-pharyngeal cancer. Oral oncology 2009;45:309-316.  Back to cited text no. 2
3.Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouqout JE. Squamous Cell Carcinoma. In: Epithelial pathology. In: Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology 2002; 3 rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders.  Back to cited text no. 3
4.Metcalfe DD. Mast cell and mastocytosis. Blood 2008;112:946-955.  Back to cited text no. 4
5.Galinsky DST, Nechushtan H. Mast cells and cancer - no longer just basic science. Critical reviews in oncology / Hematology 2008;68:115-130.  Back to cited text no. 5
6.Gounaris E, Erdman SE, Restaino C, Gurish MF, Friend DS, Gounarin F, et al. Mast cells are an essential hematopoietic component for polyp development, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2007;104:19977-19982.  Back to cited text no. 6
7.Fisher ER, Paik SM, Rockette H, Jones J, Caplan R. and Fisher B. Prognostic significance of eosinophils and mast cells in rectal cancer: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (protocol R-01). Human Pathology 1989; 20(2):159-163.  Back to cited text no. 7
8.Ch'ng S, Wallis RA, Yuan L, Davis PF, Tan ST. Mast cells and cutaneous malignancies. Modern Pathology 2006;19:149-159  Back to cited text no. 8
9.Iamaroon A, Pongsiriwet S, Jittidecharaks S, Pattanaporn K, Prapayasatok S, Wanachantararak S. Increase of mast cells and tumor angiogenesis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine 2003;32(4):195-199.  Back to cited text no. 9
10.Michailidou EZ, Markopoulos AK, and Antoniades DZ. Mast Cells and Angiogenesis in Oral Malignant and Premalignant Lesions. The Open Dentistry Journal 2008;2:126-132.  Back to cited text no. 10
11.Kalra M, Rao N, Nanda K, Rehman F, Girish KL, Tippu S, Arora A. The role of mast cells on angiogenesis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal 2012;17(2):190-196.  Back to cited text no. 11
12.Oliveira-Neto HH, Leite AF, Costa NL, Alencar RC, Lara VS, Silva TA et al. Decrease in mast cells in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Possible failure in the migration of these cells. Oral Oncology 2007;43:484-490.  Back to cited text no. 12
13.Grimbaldeston MA, Finlay-Jones JJ, Hart PH. Mast cells in photodamaged skin: what is their role in skin cancer? Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2006;5:177-183.  Back to cited text no. 13
14.Ribatti D, Vacca A, Nico B et al. Bone marrow angiogenesis and mast cell density increase simultaneously with progression of human multiple myeloma. Br J Cancer 1999;79:451-455.  Back to cited text no. 14
15.Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis. In: Cancer Medicine 2000;5:13-52.  Back to cited text no. 15
16.Makrilia N, Lappa T, Xyla V, Nikolaidis I, Syrigos K. The role of angiogenesis in solid tumours: An overview. European Journal of Internal Medicine 2009;20:663-671.  Back to cited text no. 16
17.Raica M, Cimpean AM, Ribatti D. Angiogenesis in pre-malignant conditions. Eur J Cancer 2009;45:1924-34.  Back to cited text no. 17
18.Nakayama T, Yao L, Tosato G. Mast cell-derived angiopoietin-1 plays a critical role in the growth of plasma cell tumors. J Clin Invest 2004;114(9):1317-25.  Back to cited text no. 18
19.Esposito I, Menicagli M, Funel N et al. Inflammatory cells contribute to the generation of an angiogenic phenotype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Pathol 2004;57(6):630-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
20.Muramatsu M, Katada J, Hattori M, Hayashi I, Majima M. Chymase mediates mast cell-induced angiogenesis in hamster sponge granulomas. Eur J Pharmacol 2000;402(1-2):181-91.  Back to cited text no. 20
21.Sorbo J, Jakobsson A, Norrby K. Mast cell histamine is angiogenic through receptors for histamine1 and histamine 2. Int J Exp Pathol 1994;75(1):43-50.  Back to cited text no. 21
22.Johnstone S, Logan RM. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in normal oral mucosa, oral dysplasia and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg 2007;36:263-266.  Back to cited text no. 22
23.Rajput AB, Turbin DA, Cheang MC et al. Stromal Mast cells in invasive breast cancer are a marker of favourable prognosis: a study of 4,444 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;107:249-257.  Back to cited text no. 23
24.Jamshed A, Hussain R, Rehman k et al. Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity at presentation in Pakistan. Journal of clinical oncology 2009;27.  Back to cited text no. 24
25.Bhurgri Y. Cancer of the Oral Cavity - Trends in Karachi South (1995-2002). Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 2003;6:22-26.  Back to cited text no. 25
26.Zakai MA, Ali SM, Azin M, Islam T. Etiology of Oral cancer/ Squamous Cell carcinoma in oral cavity. Annals of ASH-KMDC 2003;8:48-52.  Back to cited text no. 26
27.Isaac U, Isaac J S, Memon F. Presentation of histological types and common sites of oral cancers in lower sindh. Journal of Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences 2009;8:210-213.  Back to cited text no. 27
28.Torres-Rendon A, Roy S, Craig GT, Speight PM. Expression of Mcm2, geminin and Ki67 in normal oral mucosa, oral epithelial dysplasias and their corresponding squamous-cell carcinomas. British journal of cancer 2009;100:1128-1134.  Back to cited text no. 28
29.Keski-santti H, Atula T, Tikka J, Hollmen J, Makitie AA, Leivo L. Predictive value of histopathologic parameters in early squamous cell carcinoma of oral tongue. 2007;43:1007-1013.  Back to cited text no. 29
30.Shenoi R, Devrukhkar V, Chaudhuri, Sharma BK, Sapre SB, Chikhale A. Demographic and clinical profile of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients: A retrospective study. Indian journal of cancer 2012;49:21-26.  Back to cited text no. 30
31.Lin CS, Jen YM, Cheng MF, Lin YS, Su WF, Hwang JM, Chang LP et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa: An aggressive cancer requiring multimodality treatment. Wiley interscience 2006; DOI: 10.1002/hed.20303.  Back to cited text no. 31


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]

  [Table 1]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  >Abstract>Introduction>Materials and Me...>Results>Discussion>Conclusion>Article Figures>Article Tables
  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded321    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal