Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 138-142

Osteopontin expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Its relevance to the clinical stage of the disease

1 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central-South University, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China
2 Key Laboratory of Cancer Proteomics of Chinese Ministry of Health, Xiangya Hospital, Central-South University, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China

Date of Web Publication12-Jul-2011

Correspondence Address:
Xing-Wei Wang
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central-South University, Changsha City, Hunan Province
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.82926

Rights and Permissions
 > Abstract 

Purpose: To investigate osteopontin (OPN) expression in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and evaluate its clinical significance in the disease.
Materials and Methods: The expression of OPN mRNA in 44 frozen NPC tissue and 15 normal nasopharyngeal epithelium tissue (NNET) samples was examined by semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). OPN protein expression in 67 paraffin-embedded NPC tissue and 21 NNET samples was detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC). In addition, OPN expression was investigated in 12 paired NPC and para-carcinoma tissue (PCT) samples by western blotting (WB). The association between the expression of OPN and the clinicopathologic parameters of NPC was evaluated.
Results: Three different methods all showed that the expression of OPN mRNA or protein in NPC was significantly higher than in NNET or PCT (P = 0.000, 0.001, 0.000, respectively). After an examination by IHC, 88.1% (59/67) of NPC samples showed strong or moderate positive OPN staining and 28.6% (6/21) of NNET samples displayed a weak positive OPN staining. The staining of OPN in tumor cells was mainly localized to the cytoplasm. OPN expression in NPC was not related to patient age or sex (P > 0.05), but was significantly related to tumor size, regional lymph nodal metastasis, and NPC clinical stages (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that OPN mRNA and protein overexpression in NPC may be important in the pathogenesis of the disease. It was strongly related to T stage, N stage and clinical stages of NPC, suggesting that OPN may be involved in NPC metastasis and progression.

Keywords: Metastasis, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, osteopontin, pathogenesis, progression

How to cite this article:
Wang HH, Wang XW, Tang CE. Osteopontin expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Its relevance to the clinical stage of the disease. J Can Res Ther 2011;7:138-42

How to cite this URL:
Wang HH, Wang XW, Tang CE. Osteopontin expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Its relevance to the clinical stage of the disease. J Can Res Ther [serial online] 2011 [cited 2022 May 26];7:138-42. Available from: https://www.cancerjournal.net/text.asp?2011/7/2/138/82926

 > Introduction Top

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is one of the most common malignancies in southern China, where an annual incidence reaches up to 15-50 cases per 100,000. Likely etiological factors of NPC include Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), ethnic background, genetic susceptibility, consumption of sodium and salted foods, environmental carcinogens and so on. Over 90% of NPCs are poorly differentiated or undifferentiated squamous cell carcinoma and radiotherapy is the main choice for the treatment. Currently, with the improvement of early diagnosis and radiotherapy regime, the five-year overall survival rate of NPC patients is about 55%. Many factors may affect its prognosis, including the clinical stages, presence of keratinization, lymph node metastasis, and genetic factors. [1]

Osteopontin (OPN), also known as SPP-1, is a secreted glycophosphoprotein. It is a multifunctional cytokine, which mediates cell adhesion, migration, and Type I immunity through interacting with several cell surface receptors, [2] including αvβ3 integrin and CD44. It has been reported that OPN is overexpressed in a variety of human tumors and is associated with the tumorgenesis, development, and metastasis. [3],[4],[5],[6],[7] There is evidence that targeting OPN significantly improves the therapeutic potency in some malignancies. [8],[9] Other studies have shown that OPN expression levels in the liver, breast, stomach, and uterine cancers are related to patient survival and clinical stages, [10],[11],[12],[13] suggesting that OPN is a potential prognosis biomarker for these types of cancer. [5],[14],[15],[16] However, the expression and clinical relevance of OPN in NPC tissue samples are still unclear.

 > Materials and Methods Top

All tissue samples were from preliminary diagnosed patients who visited the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at Xiangya Hospital of Central-South University for biopsy, from March to December 2009. All patients and volunteers were informed. Each tissue sample was split into two parts. One part was immersed into formalin solution, embedded in paraffin, and routinely stained with hematoxylin and eosin and the other part was stored in liquid nitrogen immediately after resection. After careful screening, we obtained 67 NPC and 21 NNET samples which were used for IHC. Corresponding frozen tissue samples were used to extract total RNA. After assessing the quality of mRNA, we got 44 NPC and 15 NNET samples, which were used for qRT-PCR. In addition, 12 paired NPC and PCT samples were used for WB. All NPC samples in the study were differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. The detailed clinical data for patient sex, age, T stage, N stage, clinical stages are listed in [Table 1]. Tumor size and situation of regional lymph node metastasis were clinically measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scan. Tumor stages were evaluated according to Union for International Cancer Control (UICC, 2003).
Table 1: Clinicopathologic parameters of the subjects

Click here to view

Approximately 100 mg frozen tissue per sample was taken to isolate total RNA using trizol reagent (Invitrogen). The mRNA quality was evaluated by the OD260/280 ratio and samples were only used when the ratio was 1.8-2.0. Reverse transcription (RT) was performed using Reverse Transcriptase XL (AMV) kit (TaKaRa Biotechnology Co. Ltd.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The PCR program (30 cycles) consisted of denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 52°C for 30 sec, then extension at 72°C for 45 sec, and extension at 72°C for 5 min. The predicted 424 bp PCR product was amplified. OPN primer sequences were: forward; 5'-CAACTCCTCGCTTTCCAT-3'; reverse; 5'-GCTAAACCCTGACCCATCT-3'. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was chosen as the internal control. GAPDH primer sequences were: forward; 5'-GTCAGTGGTGGACCTGACCT-3'; reverse; 5'-TGAGGAGGGGAGATTCAGTG-3'. The PCR products were examined on 1.5 agarose gels with ethidium bromide staining. A FluorChem FC2 imaging system (Cell Biosciences) was used to calculate the ratio of OPN/GAPDH.

Paraffin sections (4 ΅m) were deparaffinized routinely in xylene and rehydrated through a series of graded ethanol to Tris-buffered saline (TBS) buffer. Antigen retrieval was performed in a constant high-temperature water bath (99°C) with the sections in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 15 min. The sections were incubated with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide to inactivate endogenous peroxidase and were washed with TBS. Then they were incubated with goat serum for 30 min to inhibit nonspecific binding followed by incubation with anti-osteopotin mouse monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., dilution at 1:100) overnight at 4°C. On the following day, the sections were subsequently incubated with biotin-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G antibody for 30 min at room temperature and incubated with streptavidin-biotin peroxidase solution for 10 min followed by incubation with freshly prepared DAB solution (Maixin-Bio Inc.) for 3 min. All of the sections were counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin for 30 sec, washed in running water, dehydrated and mounted with neutral gum. A section of thyroid papillary carcinoma which was previously proved to be OPN-positive was used as positive control. For a negative control, the primary antibody was replaced with phosphate buffered saline. Staining was assessed from 5 to 10 high-power fields at Χ400 magnification. Expression of OPN was determined by assessing the percentage of stained tumor cells and the staining intensity. The percentage of positive cells was rated as follows: 1-10% positive cells (1+), 11-49% positive cells (2+); 50-74% positive cells (3+); and > 75% positive cells (4+). Staining intensity was scored as negative (0), weak (1+), moderate (2+), and intensive (3+). Scores for expression and scores for percentage of positive cells were multiplied to calculate an immune-reactive score (IRS) ranging from 0 to 12, with 0-1 as (-), 2-3 as (+), 4-6 as (++), and > 6 as (+++). All of the sections were examined and scored independently by two investigators.

Total protein was extracted from each frozen tissue sample and protein concentration was determined by BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Twenty-five ΅g of total protein was loaded onto 10% sulfate polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. β-actin was used as the loading control. The membranes were then blocked with 5% skimmed milk and 0.1% Tween 20 for 1 h, followed by incubation with the OPN primary antibody (1:400, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) overnight at 4°C. The membranes were subsequently incubated for 1 h at room temperature with the mouse secondary antibody (1:2000, Maixin-Bio Inc.), and protein was detected using the enhanced chemiluminescent (ECL) reagent (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Quantitative analysis was carried out using FluorChem FC2 image analysis system (Cell Biosciences).

All of the statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS 17.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., CA.). The quantitative data was presented as mean ± standard deviation (± SD). Significance in the numerical data between the two groups was evaluated using t-test or Fisher's exact probability test. The significance in OPN expression between NPC and NNET was evaluated using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05.

 > Results Top

The expression of OPN mRNA in 44 NPC tissue samples and 15 NNET samples by qRT-PCR has been shown in [Figure 1]. The expression level of OPN mRNA in NPC samples was significantly higher than in NNET samples [Table 2] (P = 0.000). OPN protein expression in 67 cases of NPC samples and 21 cases of NNET samples was examined by IHC. OPN was mainly localized to the cytoplasm of tumor cells. The staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells were heterogeneous in some sections. The representative staining was scored [Figure 2]. There were 59 cases which showed strong or moderate positive OPN staining in 67 NPC samples (88.1%) and only six cases out of 15 NNET samples (28.6%) displayed weak positive OPN staining [Table 3]. The expression levels of OPN in NPC and NNET were significantly different (P = 0.001).
Figure 1: OPN mRNA expression was examined by qRT-PCR in NPC and normal nasopharyngeal epithelial tissues (N). GAPDH was used for normalization. The signal intensity of each sample was calculated using image software, and the OPN/ GAPDH ratio was determined

Click here to view
Figure 2: OPN protein expression in NPC was scored as strongly positive (+++) (A), moderately positive (++) (B), weakly positive (+) (C), and negative staining (D); OPN protein expression in NEET weak(+) (E) or negative (F) (original magnifi cation ×400)

Click here to view
Table 2: OPN mRNA expression in NPC and NNET examined by qRT-PCR

Click here to view
Table 3: Expression of OPN protein in NPC and NNET examined by IHC

Click here to view

To compare OPN protein expression in NPC and its corresponding PCT samples, 12 paired NPC and PCT samples were analyzed by WB [Figure 3]. This analysis found that OPN expression levels in NPC were much higher than in PCT, and the differences between them were significant [Table 4] (P = 0.000).
Figure 3: OPN protein expression in NPC and ANCT. Equal amounts of total protein (20 μg) from NPC and ANCT were analyzed by Western blotting with an anti-OPN monoclonal antibody or an anti-ƒÒ-actin monoclonal antibody as loading control

Click here to view
Table 4: OPN expression in NPC and corresponding PCT examined by WB

Click here to view

Comparing OPN mRNA and protein expression levels with various clinicopathological parameters of NPC, we found that OPN mRNA and protein expression were not significantly associated with patient age (P = 0.579, P = 0.554, respectively) and sex (P = 0.962, P = 0.594, respectively). However, it was noted that there was a significant correlation between OPN mRNA and protein expression and NPC tumor stage (T stage) (P = 0.031, P = 0.011, respectively), regional lymph nodal metastasis (N stage) (P = 0.039, P = 0.008, respectively), and clinical stages (P = 0.015, P = 0.001, respectively) [Table 5] and [Table 6].
Table 5: Correlation of OPN mRNA expression with clinicopathological parameters

Click here to view
Table 6: Correlation of OPN protein expression with clinicopathological parameters

Click here to view

 > Discussion Top

The existence of OPN was first discovered in bone mineralization of the extracellular matrix, and later it was found in various tissues and cells. [17] OPN protein contains a highly conserved arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) domain, which interacts with integrin receptors αvβ3, αvβ5 and mediates cell adhesion and migration. [18],[19] In addition to integrin, thrombin (Thrombin) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) also interact with OPN via its RGD domain. The non-RGD-binding sites in the carboxy-terminal of OPN can interact with cell surface receptors CD44v (CD44's variant) and also play an important role in cell adhesion signaling. [3]

The interactions of OPN with various cell surface receptors induce the activation of various signal transduction pathways, resulting in changes in the expression of series of genes. [20],[21] It has been shown that inhibition of αv-integrins by a cyclic RGD-peptide results in significant reduction of functional vessel density, retardation of tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. [22],[23],[24],[25],[26]

It has been reported that OPN is involved in tumorgenesis, metastasis and progression of several different types of human tumors, including pancreatic, renal, endometrial, esophageal, head and neck carcinomas. [10] A certain study found that OPN levels in NPC patients' plasma were significantly higher than in healthy individuals. In addition, high OPN levels have been shown in patients with advanced cancer and this was related to nodal metastasis. This suggested that OPN may have a potential role in the pathogenesis and nodal metastasis of NPC. [27]

In the present study, three different methods (qRT-PCR, IHC, and WB) were used for the investigations. We found that OPN/GAPDH ratios in 44 cases of NPC and 15 cases of NNET samples were 0.80±0.24 and 0.32±0.18 respectively; 88.1% (59/67) of NPC samples showed strong or moderate positive OPN staining. Only 28.6% of NNET, by comparison, displayed a weak positive OPN staining (6/15). As a result of WB, OPN/β-actin ratios in 12 paired NPC and PCT samples were 0.83±0.16 and 0.51±0.21 respectively. These results clearly showed that OPN expression is much higher in NPC than in NNET and PCT. The analysis of the relationship between OPN mRNA and NPC T, N and clinical stages showed the ratios for OPN/GAPDH in all the stages and the ratios are as follows: In T stage, OPN/GAPDH ratio was 0.73±0.27 for T1/T2 and 0.89±0.16 for T3/T4, in N stage, OPN/GAPDH ratio was 0.66±0.31 for N0 and 0.84±0.20 for N1/N2/N3 and finally OPN/GAPDH ratio was 0.63±0.31 for I/II and 0.88±0.15 for III/IV. In the same way, the positive rates of OPN staining were 77.8% (28/36) and 100% (31/31) in T1/T2 and T3/T4, 64.3% (9/14) and 94.3% (50/53) in N0 and N1/N2/N3, and 66.7% (14/21) and 97.8% (45/46) in I/II and III/IV. The analysis indicates that OPN expression is significantly correlated with NPC T, N and clinical stages.

In summary, OPN overexpression is strongly related to more aggressive behavior of NPC. It suggests that OPN might be associated with the pathogenesis, metastasis and progression of NPC. However, our study did not reveal further associations of OPN in NPC and if there is any mediation by interacting with integerin and other adhesive molecules, including MMP, thrombin, CD44 and so on. More investigations are required for this.

 > Acknowledgment Top

The authors would like to thank Drs Robert J. Rounbehler and Jun-li Luo for their invaluable guidance and help.

 > References Top

1.Heng DM, Wee J, Fong KW, Lian LG, Sethi VK, Chua ET, et al. Prognostic factors in 677 patients in Singapore with nondisseminated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 1999;86:1912-20.  Back to cited text no. 1
2.Denhardt DT, Guo X. Osteopontin: A protein with diverse functions. FASEB J 1993;7:1475-82.  Back to cited text no. 2
3.Rittling SR, Chambers AF. Role of osteopontin in tumour progression. Br J Cancer 2004;90:1877-81.  Back to cited text no. 3
4.Wai PY, Kuo PC. The role of Osteopontin in tumor metastasis. J Surg Res 2004;121:228-41.  Back to cited text no. 4
5.Donati V, Boldrini L, Dell'Omodarme M, Prati MC, Faviana P, Camacci T, et al. Osteopontin expression and prognostic significance in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:6459-65.  Back to cited text no. 5
6.Senger DR, Wirth DF, Hynes RO. Transformed mammalian cells secrete specific proteins and phosphoproteins. Cell 1979;16:885-93.  Back to cited text no. 6
7.Behrend EI, Craig AM, Wilson SM, Denhardt DT, Chambers AF. Reduced malignancy of ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells expressing antisense osteopontin RNA. Cancer Res 1994;54:832-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
8.Willett CG, Boucher Y, Di Tomaso E, Duda DG, Munn LL, Tong RT, et al. Direct evidence that the VEGF-specific antibody bevacizumab has antivascular effects in human rectal cancer. Nat Med 2004;10:145-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
9.Jain RK. Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science 2005;307:58-62.  Back to cited text no. 9
10.Pan HW, Ou YH, Peng SY, Liu SH, Lai PL, Lee PH, et al. Overexpression of osteopontin is associated with intrahepatic metastasis, early recurrence, and poorer prognosis of surgically resected hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 2003;98:119-27.  Back to cited text no. 10
11.Patani N, Jouhra F, Jiang W, Mokbel K. Osteopontin expression profiles predict pathological and clinical outcome in breast cancer. Anticancer Res 2008;28:4105-10.  Back to cited text no. 11
12.Higashiyama M, Ito T, Tanaka E, Shimada Y. Prognostic significance of osteopontin expression in human gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:3419-27.  Back to cited text no. 12
13.Cho H, Kang ES, Kim YT, Kim JH. Diagnostic and prognostic impact of osteopontin expression in endometrial cancer. Cancer Invest 2009;27:313-23.  Back to cited text no. 13
14.Coppola D, Szabo M, Boulware D, Muraca P, Alsarraj M, Chambers AF, et al. Correlation of osteopontin protein expression and pathological stage across a wide variety of tumor histologies. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:184-90.  Back to cited text no. 14
15.Rudland PS, Platt-Higgins A, El-Tanani M, De Silva Rudland S, Barraclough R, Winstanley JH, et al. Prognostic significance of the metastasis-associated protein osteopontin in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 2002;62:3417-27.  Back to cited text no. 15
16.Le QT, Sutphin PD, Raychaudhuri S, Yu SC, Terris DJ, Lin HS, et al. Identification of osteopontin as a prognostic plasma marker for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:59-67.  Back to cited text no. 16
17.Oldberg A, Franzén A, Heinegård D. Cloning and sequence analysis of rat bone sialoprotein (osteopontin) cDNA reveals an Arg-Gly-Asp cell-binding sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1986; 83:8819-23.  Back to cited text no. 17
18.Weber GF, Ashkar S, Glimcher MJ, Cantor H. Receptor-ligand interaction between CD44 and osteopontin (Eta-1). Science 1996;271:509-12.  Back to cited text no. 18
19.Zhu Y, Denhardt DT, Cao H, Sutphin PD, Koong AC, Giaccia AJ, et al. Hypoxia upregulates osteopontin expression in NIH-3T3 cells via a Ras-activated enhancer. Oncogene 2005;24:6555-63.  Back to cited text no. 19
20.Seftor RE, Seftor EA, Hendrix MJ. Molecular role(s) for integrins in human melanoma invasion. Cancer Metastasis Rev 1999;18:359-75.  Back to cited text no. 20
21.Carey I, Williams CL, Ways DK, Noti JD. Overexpression of protein kinase C-alpha in MCF-7 breast cancer cells results in differential regulation and expression of alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta5. Int J Oncol 1999;15:127-36.  Back to cited text no. 21
22.Buerkle MA, Pahernik SA, Sutter A, Jonczyk A, Messmer K, Dellian M. Inhibition of the alpha-nu integrins with a cyclic RGD peptide impairs angiogenesis, growth and metastasis of solid tumours in vivo. Br J Cancer 2002;86:788-95.  Back to cited text no. 22
23.Brooks PC, Clark RA, Cheresh DA. Requirement of vascular integrin alpha v beta 3 for angiogenesis. Science 1994;264:569-71.  Back to cited text no. 23
24.Brooks PC, Montgomery AM, Rosenfeld M, Reisfeld RA, Hu T, Klier G, et al. Integrin alpha v beta 3 antagonists promote tumor regression by inducing apoptosis of angiogenic blood vessels. Cell 1994;79:1157-64.  Back to cited text no. 24
25.Noti JD. Adherence to osteopontin via alphavbeta3 suppresses phorbol ester-mediated apoptosis in MCF-7 breast cancer cells that overexpress protein kinase C-alpha. Int J Oncol 2000;17:1237-43.  Back to cited text no. 25
26.Ue T, Yokozaki H, Kitadai Y, Yamamoto S, Yasui W, Ishikawa T, et al. Co-expression of osteopontin and CD44v9 in gastric cancer. Int J Cancer 1998;79:127-32.  Back to cited text no. 26
27.Wong TS, Kwong DL, Sham J, Wei WI, Kwong YL, Yuen AP. Elevation of plasma osteopontin level in patients with undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005;31:555-8.  Back to cited text no. 27


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]

This article has been cited by
1 FE65 Defines the Efficacy of Tamoxifen Treatment via Osteopontin Expression in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
Junyao Xu, Erina Iwabuchi, Yasuhiro Miki, Ayako Kanai, Kiyoshi Takagi, Takashi Suzuki, Takanori Ishida, Hironobu Sasano
Pathology - Research and Practice. 2022; : 153898
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 SPP1 and FN1 are significant gene biomarkers of tongue squamous cell carcinoma
Xiao-Liang Xu, Hui Liu, Ying Zhang, Su-Xin Zhang, Zhong Chen, Yang Bao, Tian-Ke Li
Oncology Letters. 2021; 22(4)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Role of osteopontin in the pathophysiology of cancer
Lalita A. Shevde,Rajeev S. Samant
Matrix Biology. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 OPN Polymorphism Is Related to the Chemotherapy Response and Prognosis in Advanced NSCLC
Yanzhang Hao,Jianwei Liu,Ping Wang,Feng Wang,Zeshun Yu,Mianli Li,Shaoshui Chen,Fangling Ning
International Journal of Genomics. 2014; 2014: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Correlation between OPN gene polymorphisms and the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Jun-li Wang,Le-gen Nong,Yu-jin Tang,Ye-sheng Wei,Feng-lian Yang,Chun-fang Wang
Medical Oncology. 2014; 31(7)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Association of osteopontin polymorphisms with nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk
Junli Wang,Legen Nong,Yesheng Wei,Shanyu Qin,You Zhou,Yujin Tang
Human Immunology. 2013;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Osteopontin cytoplasmic immunoexpression is a predictor of poor disease-free survival in thyroid cancer
Wafaey Gomaa,Mahmoud Al-Ahwal,Osman Hamour,Jaudah Al-Maghrabi
Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure. 2013; 1(1-2): 8
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 The Correlations of LMX1A and Osteopontin Expression to the Clinicopathologic Stages in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Wen-Chiuan Tsai,Chih-Kung Lin,Ya-Sung Yang,De-Chuan Chan,Hong-Wei Gao,Fei-Ni Chang,Jong-Shiaw Jin
Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology. 2012; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 The association of osteopontin and LMX1A expression with World Health Organization grade in meningiomas and gliomas
Wen-Chiuan Tsai,Herng-Sheng Lee,Chih-Kung Lin,Ann Chen,Shin Nieh,Hsin-I Ma
Histopathology. 2012; 61(5): 844
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Association between osteopontin and EGFR expression with clinicopathological parameters in hepatocellular Carcinoma
Tsai, W.-C. and Lee, H.-S. and Jin, J.-S. and Gao, H.-W. and Chao, T.-K. and Chen, A. and Nieh, S. and Chan, D.-C. and Chang, F.-N. and Lin, C.-K.
Chinese Journal of Physiology. 2012; 55(6)
11 The association of osteopontin and LMX1A expression with World Health Organization grade in meningiomas and gliomas
Tsai, W.-C. and Lee, H.-S. and Lin, C.-K. and Chen, A. and Nieh, S. and Ma, H.-I.
Histopathology. 2012; 61(5): 844-856
12 Prognostic impact of mRNA levels of osteopontin splice variants in soft tissue sarcoma patients
Hahnel, A. and Wichmann, H. and Greither, T. and Kappler, M. and Würl, P. and Kotzsch, M. and Taubert, H. and Vordermark, D. and Bache, M.
BMC Cancer. 2012; 12(131)
13 Prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with head and neck cancer: A meta-analysis
Jian Zang,Chen Li,Li-Na Zhao,Mei Shi,Yong-Chun Zhou,Jian-Hua Wang,Xin Li,David W. Eisele
Head & Neck. 2012; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  >Abstract>Introduction>Materials and Me...>Results>Discussion>Acknowledgment>Article Figures>Article Tables
  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded392    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 13    

Recommend this journal