Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 31-35

Comparison between young and old patients with bronchogenic carcinoma


Department of Pulmonary Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow - 226 003, India

Correspondence Address:
R Prasad
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow - 226 003
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.44296

Rights and Permissions

Objective: This study was undertaken to explore the clinicopathological profile of bronchogenic carcinoma in young patients. Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted on 799 consecutive histopathologically proven cases of bronchogenic carcinoma that were referred from different parts of Uttar Pradesh. Results: Out of 799 patients, 73 patients (9.1%; 59 males and 14 females) were ≤ 40 years of age and were classified as 'young' patients. The mean ages of the subjects in the younger and older patient groups were 36 and 58 years, respectively. Among the older patients, 590 (81.3%) were smokers, and there were 53 (72.6%) smokers among the younger patients. Squamous cell carcinoma was the commonest histological subtype in both the groups, but squamous cell carcinoma was more frequently diagnosed in older patients than in younger patients. Conclusion: This study suggests that, regardless of age or sex, lung cancer must be ruled out in all patients who have persistent signs of pulmonary disease and a history of heavy smoking.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4995    
    Printed184    
    Emailed5    
    PDF Downloaded510    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 7    

Recommend this journal