Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
GUEST EDITORIAL
Year : 2007  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 188-189

Surgical voice restoration following total laryngectomy


Grant Medical College and J J Hospital and Jaslok and Saifee Hospitals, Mumbai, India

Date of Web Publication6-Feb-2008

Correspondence Address:
Rehan Kazi
Grant Medical College and J J Hospital and Jaslok and Saifee Hospitals, Mumbai
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.38991

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Kazi R. Surgical voice restoration following total laryngectomy. J Can Res Ther 2007;3:188-9

How to cite this URL:
Kazi R. Surgical voice restoration following total laryngectomy. J Can Res Ther [serial online] 2007 [cited 2020 Oct 24];3:188-9. Available from: https://www.cancerjournal.net/text.asp?2007/3/4/188/38991

Total laryngectomy or laryngopharyngectomy remains the procedure of choice for advanced laryngeal/hypopharyngeal carcinoma, either as a primary procedure or as salvage following irradiation alone or concurrent chemoradiation therapy. [1] However, the procedure is not without consequences; over and above the loss of normal voice, there is loss of nasal function, poor cough, swallowing difficulties, lung function changes, tracheostomal complications and, of course, lifelong functional and psychological consequences. Functional rehabilitation of these patients has long been one of the major challenges facing otolaryngologists, speech therapists, and the patients themselves, but it is only in the last three decades that the emphasis on restoration of function and quality of life has become as important as cure and survival. The loss of natural voice is very often traumatic for the laryngectomee, presenting lifelong challenges for communication in a world that relies heavily on verbal communication. [2],[3] Over the past 25 years there has been significant improvement in the rehabilitation of these patients with speech restoration, which has dramatically altered and improved their quality of life. Patients are no longer condemned to live in silence while they await the results of their cancer treatments. They can face the challenge of life after cure of laryngeal cancer with the knowledge that a normal quality of life is possible.

Successful voice restoration for alaryngeal speakers can be attained with any one of three speech options, namely esophageal speech, electrolarynx, and now tracheoesophageal (TO) speech using a valve. [2],[3],[4] Although, no single method can be considered the best for all patients, the TO puncture has become the preferred method in the past decade. The modern era of highly successful surgical voice restoration was due to a major conceptual development in the late 1970s, which was introduced by Eric Blom and Mark Singer and which transformed the expectation and quality of voice production after total laryngectomy. [1],[3]

The technique involved creating a simple TO puncture between the posterior wall of the tracheostome and the upper esophagus, into which was inserted a one-way silicone valve. The basis of TO speech is that tracheal air, during exhalation, is shunted into the pharynx through a small, silicone-valved prosthesis in a fistulous tract [Figure - 1]. The prosthesis serves as a one-way valve to prevent salivary soiling of the airway and opens to divert pulmonary air across the pharyngoesophageal (PE) segment. Sound is produced by vibrating the mucosa of the pharyngoesophageal segment, and speech is then produced by articulation of this sound in the oral cavity.

Initially the puncture technique was used as a secondary procedure in patients with previous laryngectomy who had failed to achieve esophageal speech, but the consistently good results and superior quality of voice prompted Hamaker et al ., in 1985, to incorporate the TO puncture at the time of laryngectomy as a primary procedure.

The advantages of TO voice are many. The procedure is possible in patients who have had a laryngectomy, neck dissection, and/or radiotherapy. Moreover, the fistula is a convenient route for esophagogastric feeding in the immediate postoperative period. The procedure is also easily reversible if desired by the patient. In addition, TO speech is more quickly attained than esophageal speech. Since its air supply is pulmonary, TO speech is closer to laryngeal speech than esophageal speech on a range of voice parameters, such as fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer, words per minute, and maximum phonation time.

Since the first description of a TO voice prosthesis in 1980, many new devices have been developed and several of the original devices have been modified. Today, the Blom-Singer and Provox prosthesis developed at the Netherlands Cancer Institute are the most widely-used voice prostheses around the world. [2],[5],[6],[7] The first voice prostheses (Blom-Singer, Panje) were designed as exdwelling devices, to be taken care of by the patient. This was soon followed by hands-free devices, low-pressure and, finally, the indwelling prosthesis that is maintained by the clinician. Not surprisingly, the success rate of vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy has improved considerably and, today, prosthetic voice restoration is the method of choice for most medical professionals treating laryngectomized patients. [3],[8] In many centers now, voice prostheses have replaced esophageal speech as the gold standard for voice rehabilitation.

Communication is much more than just the physiologic process of producing speech and TO speech is not synonymous with prosthetic placement. Nor is it simply the physiologic production of sound shaped by the movement of the articulator. The variations in inflection and intonation, patterns of stress and intensity, prosody, and fluency, which are the hallmarks of laryngeal speech, do not 'just happen' as soon as the prosthesis is placed and the patient speaks; they require focused practice. As with any other skill, excellence in performance requires commitment and work. The superior TO speaker not only masters the fundamentals of the method but also refines it to maximize his or her potential to communicate in a new and socially acceptable way. [6],[9]

At first glance the TO puncture technique appears to be a straightforward method of alaryngeal voice restoration, requiring nothing more than 'making a hole and sticking in a valve.' However, nothing could be further from the truth, as any experienced clinician will testify. Surgeons and clinicians should recognize that, as with any surgical technique, success is dependent on sufficient knowledge, training, and accrued clinical experience. [5],[10] Careful attention must be directed to PE segment integrity, valve selection, and troubleshooting. Despite new device designs in recent years, candidal infestation of the prostheses and leakage continue to remain a problem. Although problems and complications occur, they are manageable when they are recognized early and a methodical treatment plan is formulated. [6],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15] High success rates can be achieved and large numbers of laryngectomized patients can be rehabilitated for relatively normal lives and social reintegration. Successful TO voice restoration in laryngectomy patients can be very rewarding, but the cost and other problems associated with maintaining the prosthesis are often prohibitive, especially in third-world countries. The great advance of this time is that laryngeal cancer is treatable and with voice preservation or restoration patients are no longer condemned to silence while they await the results of their cancer treatments. They can face the challenge of life after cure of laryngeal cancer with the knowledge that normal quality of life is possible.

Finally, it must be remembered that voice restoration is a process and not just implantation of prosthesis!

 
 > References Top

1.Singer MI, Blom ED. An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1980;89:529-33.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Blom ED. Evolution of tracheoesophageal voice prostheses. In: Blom ED, Singer MI, Hamaker RC, editors. Tracheoesophageal voice restoration following total laryngectomy. Singular Publishing Group: San Diego; 1998. p.1-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Taub S, Spiro RH. Vocal rehabilitation of laryngectomees: Preliminary report of a new technique. Am J Surg 1972;124:87-90.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
4.Hamaker RC, Singer MI, Blom ED, Daniels HA. Primary voice restoration at laryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol 1985;111:182-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Johnson JT, Casper J, Lesswing NJ. Toward the total rehabilitation of the alaryngeal patient. Laryngoscope 1979;89:1813-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Simpson IC, Smith JS, Gordon T. Laryngectomy: The influence of muscle reconstruction on the mechanism of oesophageal voice production. J Laryngol Otol 1972;86:961-90.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.McIvor J, Evans PF, Perry A, Cheesman AD. Radiological assessment of post-laryngectomy speech. Clin Radiol 1990;41:312-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Hilgers FJ, Aaronson NK, Ackerstaff AH, Schouwenburg PF, van Zandwikj N. The influence of a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) on the respiratory symptoms after total laryngectomy. Clin Otolaryngol 1991;16:152-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Trudeau MD, Schuller DE, Hall DA. The effects of radiation on tracheo-oesophageal puncture. Arch Otolaryngol Year missing;115: 1116-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Hoffman HT, Fischer H, VanDemark D, Peterson KL, McCulloch TM, Karnell LH, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin injection after total laryngectomy. Head Neck 1997;19:92-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Singer MI, Blom ED, Hamaker RC. Further experience with voice restoration after total laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1981;90:498-502.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.Blom ED, Singer MI, Hamaker RC. Tracheostoma valve for post laryngectomy voice rehabilitation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982;91:576-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.Ackerstaff AH, Hilgers FJ, Aaronson NK, Balm AJ, van Zandwijk N. Improvements in respiratory and psychosocial functioning following total laryngectomy by use of heat and moisture exchanger. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993;102:878-83.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.Garth RJ, McRae A, Rhys Evans PH. Tracheooesophageal puncture: A review of problems and complications. J Laryngol Otol 1991;105:750-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Blom ED. Tracheoesophageal valves: Problems, solutions and directions for the future. Head Neck Surg Year missing;2:S142-5.  Back to cited text no. 15
    


    Figures

  [Figure - 1]


This article has been cited by
1 Oral microbial colonization in laryngectomized patients as a possible cofactor of biofilm formation on their voice prostheses
Kristina Bertl,Beata Zatorska,Matthias Leonhard,Julia Rechenmacher-Strauss,Imme Roesner,Berit Schneider-Stickler
Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2013; 40(9): 833
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Rehabilitation of patients following major head and neck cancer surgery
Mitchell, O. and Durrani, A. and Price, R.
British Journal of Nursing. 2012; 21(10 SUPPL.): S31-S37
[Pubmed]
3 Post laryngectomy speech and voice rehabilitation: Past, present and future
Kazi, R. and Sayed, S.I. and Dwivedi, R.C.
ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2010; 80(11): 770-771
[Pubmed]
4 Primary tracheoesophageal puncture using carbon dioxide laser
Suhail Sayed, Rehan Kazi, Mohan Jagade
Lasers in Medical Science. 2010;
[VIEW] | [DOI]
5 Tracheo-oesophageal party wall thickness in laryngectomised patients in India: Implications for surgical voice restoration
Suhail I.Sayed,Kapila Manikantan,Shailesh Khode,Mohan Jagade, Vimal G.Kasbekar,Rajen Shah
Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2010; 101(1): 78-83
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Post laryngectomy speech and voice rehabilitation: past, present and future
Rehan Kazi,Suhail I. Sayed,Raghav C. Dwivedi
ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2010; 80(11): 770
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 A Short Perspective on the Surgical Restoration of Alaryngeal Speech
Rehan Kazi,Chris M. Nutting,Peter Rhys-Evans,Kevin J. Harrington
Southern Medical Journal. 2009; 102(8): 838
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 A short perspective on the surgical restoration of alaryngeal speech
Kazi, R., Nutting, C.M., Rhys-Evans, P., Harrington, K.J.
Southern Medical Journal. 2009; 102(8): 838-840
[Pubmed]
9 Future perspectives for health related quality of life (HRQOL) studies in head and neck cancer
Dwivedi, R.C., Nutting, C.M., Rhys-Evans, P., Harrington, K.J., Kazi, R.
Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia. 2009; 31(3 SUPPL B): B17-B20
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  >Article Figures
  In this article
>References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed6715    
    Printed115    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded459    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 9    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]