|Year : 2007 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 111-115
Retrospective analysis of role of interstitial brachytherapy using template (MUPIT) in locally advanced gynecological malignancies
Pooja K Nandwani, Rakesh K Vyas, JP Neema, Unnikrishan K Suryanarayan, Devang C Bhavsar, Kinjal R Jani
Department of Radiation Oncology, Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India
Pooja K Nandwani
N-3, Government Officers Colony, Meghani Nagar, Ahmedabad - 380 016, Gujarat
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Aim : The aim of this retrospective study was to assess treatment outcomes for patients with locally advanced gynecological malignancies being treated with interstitial brachytherapy using Martinez universal perineal interstitial template (MUPIT) and to study the acute and late sequelae and survival after treatment by this technique.
Materials and Methods : Ninety seven patients untreated with histopathological confirmation of carcinoma of cervix (37) vault (40) and vagina (20) were treated by combination of external beam RT (EBRT) using megavoltage irradiation to pelvis to dose of 4000-5000 cGy followed by interstitial brachytherapy using MUPIT between September 2001 to March 2005. Median age was 46 years. Only those patients who were found unsuitable for conventional brachytherapy or in whom intracavitatory radiotherapy was found to be unlikely to encompass a proper dose distribution were treated by interstitial template brachytherapy using MUPIT application and were enrolled in this study. The dose of MUPIT was 1600-2400 cGy in 4-6# with 400 cGy /# and two fractions a day with minimum gap of six hours in between two fractions on micro-HDR. Criteria for inclusion of patients were as follows: Hb minimum 10 gm/dl, performance status - 70% or more (Karnofsy scale), histopathological confirmation FIGO stage IIB-IIIB (excluding frozen pelvis).
Results : Among the 97 patients studied, 12 patients lost to follow-up and hence they were excluded from the study. Follow-up of rest of the patients was then done up to September 2006. The duration of follow-up was in the range of 20-60 months. Parameters studied were local control rate, complication rate, mortality rate and number of patients developing systemic metastasis. Local control was achieved in 56/85 (64.7%) and complication rate was 15/85 (17.6%). Local control was better for nonbulky tumors compared bulky tumors irrespective of stage of disease. Local control was better in patients with good regression of disease after external beam radiotherapy. Time of gap between EBRT and implant also had an impact on the outcome.
Conclusion : Interstitial template brachytherapy by MUPIT is a good alternative to deliver high dose radiation in locally advanced gynecological malignancies where conventional brachytherapy application is either not feasible or likely to give optimal dose distribution. Loco regional control obtained is definitely better than EBRT alone and within the accepted range of complications.
Keywords: Interstitial brachytherapy, locally advanced gynecological malignancies, Martinez universal perineal interstitial template
|How to cite this article:|
Nandwani PK, Vyas RK, Neema J P, Suryanarayan UK, Bhavsar DC, Jani KR. Retrospective analysis of role of interstitial brachytherapy using template (MUPIT) in locally advanced gynecological malignancies. J Can Res Ther 2007;3:111-5
|How to cite this URL:|
Nandwani PK, Vyas RK, Neema J P, Suryanarayan UK, Bhavsar DC, Jani KR. Retrospective analysis of role of interstitial brachytherapy using template (MUPIT) in locally advanced gynecological malignancies. J Can Res Ther [serial online] 2007 [cited 2020 Dec 1];3:111-5. Available from: https://www.cancerjournal.net/text.asp?2007/3/2/111/34692
| > Introduction|| |
Gynecological malignancies are a sizeable proportion of all the cancers among female population in India. Majority of patients have locally advanced disease at time of presentation stage IIB- IVA. Radiotherapy plays a very important role in overall management of these cancers both in early stages as well as locally advanced stages. , It may be delivered as pelvic external beam RT (EBRT) and / or brachytherapy. External beam pelvic radiotherapy generally precedes brachytherapy as it helps in sterilizing the nodal metastasis and shrinking the primary tumor for an optimal brachytherapy application later on. Although cervix and vagina can tolerate a high radiation dose, it is not possible to deliver high dose by EBRT without causing damage to neighboring dose limiting vital structures like urinary bladder and rectum. Brachytherapy plays a vital role here as it helps in escalating the radiation dose to primary tumor area yet sparing the surrounding normal tissues resulting in improved tumor control probability and with minimum morbidity.
Intracavitatory radiotherapy (ICRT) and central vaginal cylinder (CVC) are conventionally employed to deliver a very high dose to cervix and vagina with minimal dose to rectum and bladder. Thus it achieves a very good cure rate with acceptable morbidity. Though ICRT is the standard technique of brachytherapy used for cervical carcinoma, interstitial brachytherapy is recommended for some cases in which either ICRT is expected to result in a suboptimal dose distribution or it is technically not possible. Some of the indications of interstitial implantation are: ,,
- Bulky primary disease
- Bulky parametrial extension
- Extensive paravaginal or distal vaginal involvement
- Narrow vagina or poor geometry not accommodating an ovoid (colpostat)
- Loss of endocervical canal not allowing a tandem placement.
- Prior radiation therapy to implanted area (recurrent or residual disease)
- Posthysterectomy recurrences
- Cut through hysterectomy
- Cervical stump presentation
Interstititial brachytherapy was developed to address these problems. Generally, external beam irradiation is given first to reduce the tumor bulk followed by single interstitial implant within a week of completion of external beam irradiation. Proper dose distribution by interstitial implant requires precise needle placement to fully encompass the tumor while avoiding critical normal structures. And to achieve this different types of templates are used. Various templates available are:
- Syed-Neblett system ,,,
- Martinez universal perineal interstitial template (MUPIT) ,,
- Nori-Hilaris Anderson template
- Porter perineal template
Of these the above two are most widely used templates. The present study focuses on the use of MUPIT in conjunction with EBRT in the treatment of locally advanced gynecological malignancies.
| > Materials and Methods|| |
Between September 2001 to March 2005, 97 patients were taken for MUPIT and the study of these patients was done retrospectively and traced till September 2006. Out of these 37 patients were of carcinoma cervix, 40 of carcinoma of vault and 20 of carcinoma of vagina. All the patients were treated with combination of EBRT followed by interstitial brachytherapy using MUPIT applicator. Since 12 patients were lost to follow-up, 85 patients were finally studied. 30 out of which were of carcinoma of the cervix, 35 of carcinoma of the vault and 20 of carcinoma of vagina. All patients underwent examination under anesthesia, biopsy and routine workup before treatment. All patients received EBRT 4000-5000 cGy midplane in 20-30 # with 180-200 cGy /#, five days a week to whole pelvis by either anterior and posterior parallel opposed portals or four field technique on cobalt 60 or dual energy linear accelerator. All patients were examined under anesthesia one to two weeks after completion of EBRT and evaluated for response to EBRT and labeled as:
Complete response (CR) = complete regression of tumor
Partial response (PR) = >50% regression of tumor
No response (NR) = <50% regression or increase in size of tumor.
Patients were also evaluated for ICRT/CVC. Only those patients who were found unsuitable for ICRT/CVC or in whom ICRT was found to be unlikely to encompass the tumor volume were treated with interstitial brachytherapy using MUPIT applicator and were enrolled for this study. Hemoglobin minimum 10 gm%, performance status 70% or more (Karnofsky scale) or 0-2 (ECOG), histopathological confirmation, FIGO stage IIB-IIIB (excluding frozen pelvis).
All patients were admitted and they underwent a thorough preanesthetic checkup. Bowel wash with 1% neomycin solution was given thrice before the procedure and perineal region was meticulously shaved and cleaned with savlon. Vaginal douching was done.
The procedure was performed under epidural anesthesia with full aseptic precautions.
Epidural catheter was maintained for postoperative pain management. Pervaginal examination under anesthesia was performed to assess the dimensions of the tumor, parametrial and paravaginal tissue involvement and relationship of the tumor to the uterus and other pelvic organs. The inferior extent of tumor was done with silver markers. Foley's catherisation was done with 7 ml of diatriazoate (urograffin) pushed into its bulb. A stay suture was taken over anterior lip of cervix or anterior fornix with a long thread held outside by artery forceps. This was used to fix the structures. While inserting needles a guide needle was inserted mostly through the posterior vaginal wall with one finger in the rectum. The tip of this needle was taken 1-2 cm beyond the clinically palpable disease. Vaginal length was determined and vaginal cylinders were fixed to the template at that length. The cylinder was then inserted in the vagina with the guide needle in one of its groove. The template was then secured to the perineum by means of stitches through peripheral holes. The remaining needles were placed around the vaginal cylinders up to the preset depth. The number and position of needles were according to the extent of the disease. Needles were bilaterally symmetrical in most of the cases.
Thereafter check cystoscopy was done and if any needle was found in the urinary bladder, that needle was removed. Thorough examination was done per rectally to confirm that no needle has pierced the rectal mucosa. The rectal plate was attached with the rest of the template to complete the assembly; rectal tube (modified malecot catheter) was pushed through the lowermost central hole. The cover plate was fixed over the template assembly. Packing was done with gauze pieces soaked in betadine solution.
Orthogonal X-rays were taken on simulator. The needles were plotted on computer by means of radiographs and planning was done according to stepping source dosimetry for the treatment to be delivered on HDR microselectron. The computer program used was PLATO TPS. Needles were loaded with dummies up to the treatment length (that depend on dimension of tumor) the isodose covering the treatment volume uniformly was selected to prescribe the dose. Geometric and dose point optimization was used to achieve the uniform dose distribution. Doses to bladder and rectum were calculated by selecting points according to ICRU criteria. A total dose of 1600-2400 cGy in 4 to 6 # (400 cGy per #) was delivered on micro selectron. HDR. Two fractions were delivered a day with a minimum of 6 hours gap in between two fractions [Figure - 1].
Implant was removed after completion of treatment. Throughout the treatment period, adequate antibiotic coverage was given and hydration of patient was maintained. Analgesia in the form of 60 mg of morphine was given through the epidural catheter, twice a day.
Post implant follow-up
All patients were kept on monthly follow-up for the first six months, quarterly up to two years, six monthly in the third year and annually thereafter. During follow-up, patients were evaluated for local response, complications and distant metastasis.
Grading of reaction
Grade 1: Mild transient symptoms of enteritis, procto-sigmoiditis, cystitis, etc, that responds to conservative treatment.
Grade 2: Severe and/or persistent episodes of proctosigmoiditis, cystitis, etc, that respond to conservative treatment but requires hospitalization.
Grade 3: Fistula formation and complications that require surgical intervention.
| > Results|| |
This is a retrospective study of 97 patients of locally advanced gynecological malignancies. As 12 patients were lost to follow-up, they were excluded from the study. The proportion of cases was 30 cases of cancer cervix, 35 of cancer vault and 20 cases of cancer of vagina. Majority of patients were in fourth and fifth decade of life. The age of patients ranged from 34-74 years. Age wise distribution is shown in [Table - 1]. Stage wise distribution is shown in [Table - 2].
Majority of patients were epidermoid carcinoma, moderately differentiated. All patients were given external beam radiotherapy 4000-5000 cGy in 20-30 # over -four to five weeks and assessed for response after -one to two weeks. Partial response was observed in 30 (35.2%) and complete response in 26 (30.5%) patients. Patients who were technically not suitable for intracavitary application or had bulky tumors, which were unlikely to be encompassed sufficiently by intracavitary application, were taken for interstitial implant. These patients were delivered a dose of 16 - 24 Gy in 4-6 #, 4 Gy / #, 2 # per day with minimum of six hours of gap between two fractions.
All patients were followed-up monthly and the follow up period was in range of 20-60 months. Local control was 56 (65.8%) at three month follow-up which is shown in [Table - 3] cases showing persistent disease in third month never achieved local control. Local control in relation with stage is shown in [Table - 4].
Five patients developed systemic metastasis. Four patients developed liver metastasis. All of them were offered palliative chemotherapy. One of them was locally free but died when traced till the last follow-up. Rest three was in NR group out of which two also expired when traced to the last follow-up. One patient who had partial response developed supraclavicular LN 1.5 years later and was offered palliative RT (20 GY / 5 #) for the same. Two patients of NR group had progression of disease and both of them had later developed VVF. And when traced till the last follow-up, they had expired. The time gap between EBRT and implant also had an impact on the outcome. In cases with gap < or equal to 25 days, local control was better then those having > 25 days gap.
Four patients suffered from skin reactions and were treated conservatively. Grade I toxicity was seen in one patient which was relieved with symptomatic treatment. Grade II toxicity was seen in eight patients who were hospitalized and managed conservatively. Grade III toxicity was seen in six patients.
| > Discussion|| |
Standard treatment for advanced gynecological malignancies consists of combination of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. External beam radiotherapy is fractionated over several weeks, usually conventional fractionation with 180 to 200 cGy per fraction with the aim of reducing the tumor to a size, which can be irradiated more effectively with brachytherapy. However, not infrequently and despite doses as high as 5000-6000 cGy by EBRT, tumor regression is only partial, leaving the tumor unsuitable for conventional brachytherapy.
Conventional intracavitary applicators (tandem and ovoids) deliver a large central dose with rapid dose fall off towards the periphery. It offers the advantage of homogenous dose distribution to the tumor volume but spares the surrounding normal organs and tissues. Also, with intracavitary application, treatment can be completed over a shorter time compared to EBRT. Brachytherapy is delivered using either LDR or HDR afterloading techniques. The central dose in these applications is represented by "point A" (which is defined as 2 cm above and lateral to the cervical collar top) and peripheral dose by "point B" (which is 3 cm lateral to point A). If 100% dose is given to point A, only a 30% dose is delivered to point B. Bladder and rectum tolerance become a limiting factor in an effort to increase the dose at point B. In advanced disease, the problem is still compounded by two factors:
a. Significant parametrial disease extending up to lateral pelvic wall with high incidence of positive pelvic nodes.
b. Distortion of local anatomy (improper geometry) with the resultant interference in placement of applicators. If at all treatment is delivered using standard intracavitary applicators, dose distribution curve does not encompass the tumor volume properly.
These limitations have long been recognized to be responsible for the lack of effectiveness of this treatment modality in advanced cases.
A number of retrospective analysis in the past showed that most of tumor recurrence especially in locally advanced cases occurred in pelvis after conventional tandem and ovoids treatment.
Templates were therefore invented which not only determined the position of needles but also their course inside the tumor. Primarily, these templates consist of a central large hole for placement of tandem and an array of small holes around this large hole for insertion of needles. Syed-Neblett parametrial butterfly and Martinez Universal Parametrial Interstitial Template have been the two major innovations in this direction. Most of the studies were conducted using these two templates and their prototypes.
The radionuclides used are Iridium 192 , and Iodine 125. When the perineal interstitial implant is combined with ICRT, the uterine tandem is attached to the suitable brachytherapy equipment and the interstitial template loaded separately with radioactive sources.
When perineal interstitial implant was used after EBRT, a dose of 2000 or 3000 cGy is delivered in 4-6 fractions. Thus, the procedure may last for a period of three to six days and the whole applicator system may cause pain and discomfort to the patient.
The major studies are listed in the [Table - 5].
Martinez et al. constructed a multipurpose template, which could be used for a variety of perineal malignancies. It has the provision of both central tandem and central needle either of which could be used justifiably for optimal dose distribution simultaneously taking care of bladder and rectal tolerance. Martinez et al. achieved the local control in 84%, with complication rate as low as 5% in a group of 78 patients with advanced gynecological malignancies.
In our study, brachytherapy was delivered with high activity (10 Ci) Ir 192 stepping source using microselectron HDR. All our patients received EBRT 4000-5000 cGy, 180-200 cGy per fraction, five fractions per week followed by interstitial brachytherapy using MUPIT applicator within three to four weeks of EBRT. An indication of interstitial brachytherapy in most of our patients was either nonnegotiable cervical os or partial response to EBRT with bulky residual disease unlikely to be encompassed by ICRT. Planning at our setup was done according to stepping source dosimetry system using the computer program PLATO TPS. Geometric and dose point optimization was used for uniform dose distribution to tumor area. Total dose delivered by brachytherapy ranged from 1600 to 2400 cGy, 400cGy per fraction in four to six fractions. Two fractions were delivered in 24h with a minimum gap of six hours between two fractions.
In our study local control was achieved in 56 cases (64.7%), which is comparable to other studies. Five patients (5.8%) had systemic metastasis. Four had liver metastasis and one had supraclavicular metastasis. Complication rate was 17.6%, which was also comparable to other studies. This is shown in [Table - 5].
| > Conclusion|| |
- Interstitial template brachytherapy by MUPIT is a good alternative in locally advanced carcinoma of cervix and vagina where intracavitary application is either not feasible or unlikely to encompass tumor volume adequately.
- The local control rate of 64.7% obtained is definitely better than external beam therapy alone and is comparable to other studies.
- The rate of complications of 17.6% indicates that with slightly better planning and optimization, there can be further reduction in complications without compromising local control using HDR brachytherapy.
| > References|| |
|1.||Devita VT, Hellman S, Rosenber SA. Cancer: Principles and practice of oncology. 6 th ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins: Philadelphia (PA); 2001. p. 1542-3. |
|2.||Rath GK, Chander S, Patel AK. Textbook of radiation oncology. 1 st ed. Churchill Livingstone: New Delhi; 2004. p. 445-70. |
|3.||Aristizabal SA, Surwit EA, Hevezi JM, Heusinkveld RS. Treatment of advanced cancer of the cervix with transperineal interstitial irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1983;9:1013-7. |
|4.||Aristizabal SA, Valencia A, Ocampo G. Interstitial parametrial irradiation in cancer of the cervix stage IIb-IIIb: An analysis of pelvic control and complications. Endocurie Hyperth Oncol 1985;1:41-8. |
|5.||Nag S, Martinez-Monge R, Ellis R, Lewandowski G, Vacarello L, Boutselis JG, et al . The use of fluoroscopy to guide needle placement in interstitial gynecological brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998;40:415-20. |
|6.||Ampuero F, Doss LL, Khan M, Skipper B, Hilgers RD. The Syed-Neblett interstitial template in locally advanced gynecological malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1983;9:1897-903. |
|7.||Perez CA, Brady LW, Halperin EC. Principles and practice of radiation oncology. 4 th ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins: Philadelphia (PA); 2004. p. 576-7. |
|8.||Syed AM, Neblett D, Feder BH. Treatment of extensive carcinoma of cervix with "transperineal parametrial butterfly". Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1978;4:735-42. |
|9.||Syed AM, Feder BH. Techniques of after loading interstitial implants. Radiol Clin 1977;46:458-75. |
|10.||Martinez A, Cox SR, Edmundson GK. A multiple site perineal applicator (MUPIT) for treatment of locally advanced or recurrent prostatic, anorectal and gynecological malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1984;10:297-305. |
|11.||Martinez A, Edmundson GK, Cox RS, Gunderson LL, Howes AE. Combination of EBRT and MUPIT for treatment of locally advanced or recurrent gynecological cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1985;11:391-8. |
|12.||Martinez A, Edmundson GK, Clarke D. The role of transperineal template implants in gynecological malignancies. Brachyther J 1991;5:107-13. |
|13.||Feder BH, Syed AM, Neblett D. Treatment of extensive carcinoma of the cervix with the "transperineal parametrial butterfly": A preliminary report on the revival of Waterman's approach. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1978;4:735-42. |
|14.||Pempree T. Parametrial implant in stage III b cancer cervix. III. A five-year study. Cancer 1983;52:748-50. |
|15.||Gaddis O, Morrow CP, Klement V, Schlaerth JB, Nalick RH. Treatment of cervical carcinoma employing a template for transperineal interstitial Ir 192 brachy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1983;9:819-217. |
|16.||Syed AM, Puthawala AA, Neblett D. Transperineal interstitial Intracavitary syed-neblett applicator in treatment of ca cervix. Endocurie Hyperth Oncol 1986;2:1-13. |
|17.||Hughes-Davies L, Silver B, Kapp DS. Parametrial interstitial brachytherapy for advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancy: The Harvard/Stanford experience. Gynecol Oncol 1995;58:24-7. |
|18.||Nag S, Martinez-Monge R, Selman AE, Copeland LJ. Interstitial brachytherapy in the management of primary carcinoma of the cervix and vagina. Gynecol Oncol 1998;70:27-32. |
|19.||Monk BJ, Krishnansu T, Burger RA, Johnson MT, Montz FJ, Berman ML. A comparison of intracavitary versus interstitial irradiation in the treatment of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1997;67:241-7. |
|20.||Demanes DJ, Rodriguez RR, Bendre DD, Ewing TL. High dose rate transperineal interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer: High pelvic control and low complication rates. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;45:105-12. |
|21.||Gupta AK, Vicini FA, Frazier AJ, Barth-Jones DC, Edmundson GK, Mele E, et al. Iridium-192 transperineal interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced or recurrent gynecological malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;43:1055-60. |
[Figure - 1]
[Table - 1], [Table - 2], [Table - 3], [Table - 4], [Table - 5]
|This article has been cited by|
||Clinical outcomes of high-dose-rate interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy using real-time CT guidance
| ||Lee, L.J. and Damato, A.L. and Viswanathan, A.N. |
| ||Brachytherapy. 2013; 12(4): 303-310 |
||A retrospective six years analysis of survival and late morbidity of post-operative gynaecological malignancy treated with external radiotherapy followed by brachytherapy in Medical College & Hospitals, Kolkata
| ||Sau, S. and Ghosh, S. and Mitra, S. and Manna, A. and Mondal, B. and Ghosh, K. |
| ||Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India. 2013; 63(2): 128-134 |
||Clinical outcomes of high-dose-rate interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy using real-time CT guidance
| ||Larissa J. Lee,Antonio L. Damato,Akila N. Viswanathan |
| ||Brachytherapy. 2013; 12(4): 303 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Template-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in gynecologic cancers: A single institutional experience
| ||Umesh Mahantshetty,Shyamkishore Shrivastava,Nikhil Kalyani,Susovan Banerjee,Reena Engineer,Supriya Chopra |
| ||Brachytherapy. 2013; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||A Retrospective Six Years Analysis of Survival and Late Morbidity of Post-operative Gynaecological Malignancy Treated with External Radiotherapy Followed by Brachytherapy in Medical College & Hospitals, Kolkata
| ||Sourav Sau,Suparna Ghosh,Shila Mitra,Amitava Manna,Bidyut Mondal,Koushik Ghosh |
| ||The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India. 2013; 63(2): 128 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Three-dimensional conformal brachytherapy boost in locally recurrent or residual cervical carcinoma: Does it impact clinical outcome?
| ||Vivek Bansal, Gaurav Kumar, Ritu Bhutani, Gurusamy Venkadamanickam, Surender Kumar Sharma, Ashok Kumar Sigamani, Rupinder Shekhon, Sudhir Kumar Rawal |
| ||Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2013; 39(1): 264 |
|[VIEW] | [DOI]|
||Inverse-planned gynecologic high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy: Clinical outcomes and dose–volume histogram analysis
| ||Isabelle Thibault,Marie-Claude Lavallée,Sylviane Aubin,Nathalie Laflamme,Éric Vigneault |
| ||Brachytherapy. 2012; 11(3): 181 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Inverse-planned gynecologic high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy: Clinical outcomes and dose-volume histogram analysis
| ||Thibault, I. and LavallÃ©e, M.-C. and Aubin, S. and Laflamme, N. and Vigneault, T. |
| ||Brachytherapy. 2012; 11(3): 181-191 |
||Image-guided vulvovaginal interstitial brachytherapy in the treatment of primary and recurrent gynecological malignancies
| ||Paul De Ieso, Vinod Mullaserry, Raj Shrimali, Gerry Lowe, Linda Bryant, Peter J. Hoskin |
| ||Brachytherapy. 2011; |
|[VIEW] | [DOI]|
||Image and laparoscopic guided interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced primary or recurrent gynaecological cancer using the adaptive GEC ESTRO target concept
| ||Lars Fokdal, Kari Tanderup, Søren Kynde Nielsen, Henrik Kidmose Christensen, Lisbeth Røhl, Erik Morre Pedersen, Niels Kim Schønemann, Jacob Christian Lindegaard |
| ||Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2011; |
|[VIEW] | [DOI]|
||Iatrogenic vulvar skin metastases after interstitial radiotherapy for recurrent cervical cancer
| ||Hideomi YAMASHITA, Kae OKUMA, Keiichi NAKAGAWA |
| ||The Journal of Dermatology. 2009; 36(12): 663-665 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|