Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2015  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 8  |  Page : 248--252

Two different endoscopic long intestinal tube placements for small bowel obstruction: Transnasal ultrathin endoscopy versus conventional endoscopy


Shengxi Li1, Chu Yuan2, Mei-Dong Xu2 
1 Digestive Endoscopy Center, People's Hospital of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning, China
2 Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P. R, China

Correspondence Address:
Mei-Dong Xu
Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180, Fenglin Road, Shanghai 200032
China

Aim: To investigate and compare the effect on small bowel obstruction (SBO) of a long intestinal tube inserted by two different endoscopic placements which are transnasal ultrathin endoscopy and conventional endoscopy. Patients and Methods: Twenty-nine patients who had been diagnosed as suffering from SBO underwent long tube insertion placed by transnasal ultrathin endoscopy were included as subjects. Thirty-two patients who had undergone insertion of a long tube placed by conventional endoscopy were included as controls. The success rate of intubation of the small bowel, the time required for the procedure, and complications were compared between the subjects and controls. Results: The success rate of intubation was 100% (29/29) in subjects and 93.8% (30/32) in controls, without a significant difference (P = 0.493). There are 2 failed cases that the procedure was attempted near 60 min in 2 patients who had performed Billroth II anastomosis before, and the intestinal tube could not be inserted into efferent loops of jejunum in controls. The mean time required for the procedure was 15.3 min in subjects and 22.9 min in controls, respectively, and with a significant difference (P < 0.001). Epistaxis occurred in both groups, and 2 cases encountered bleeding of the gastrointestinal tract in controls. Conclusion: Long tube insertion facilitated by transnasal ultrathin endoscopy takes shorter time and has a higher success rate compared with the procedure conducted with the help of conventional endoscopy. It is safe and useful to insert a long intestinal tube assisted by transnasal ultrathin endoscopy for the decompression of small bowel.


How to cite this article:
Li S, Yuan C, Xu MD. Two different endoscopic long intestinal tube placements for small bowel obstruction: Transnasal ultrathin endoscopy versus conventional endoscopy.J Can Res Ther 2015;11:248-252


How to cite this URL:
Li S, Yuan C, Xu MD. Two different endoscopic long intestinal tube placements for small bowel obstruction: Transnasal ultrathin endoscopy versus conventional endoscopy. J Can Res Ther [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Feb 29 ];11:248-252
Available from: http://www.cancerjournal.net/article.asp?issn=0973-1482;year=2015;volume=11;issue=8;spage=248;epage=252;aulast=Li;type=0