Year : 2006 | Volume
: 2 | Issue : 3 | Page : 129--131
Diagnostic value of silver nitrate staining for nucleolar organizer regions in selected head and neck tumors
Behnam Eslami1, Hessam Rahimi2, Farzaneh Rahimi3, Monir Moradzadeh Khiavi4, Asghar Ebadifar5,
1 Department of OMF Pathology, Shaheed Beheshti School of Dentistry, Tehran, Iran
2 Basic Sciences Research Dept, Iran Center for Dental Research, Tehran, Iran
3 Pathology Dept, Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
5 Iran Center for Medical Research, Tehran, Iran
Iran Center for Dental Research, Shaheed Beheshti School of Dentistry, Evin, Tehran 19834
Background: The present study is aimed to assess the usefulness of silver nitrate staining of nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) as a quantitative criterion for the diagnosis of selected head and neck tumors.
Materials and Methods: The silver nitrate staining technique was used on 195 paraffin blocks collected from 85 patients. The samples consisted of 21 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of larynx, 28 SCC of oral mucosa and 36 samples of most common salivary gland tumors. Mann-Whitney U-Test was used for data analysis.
Results: A significant difference was seen in the number of AgNOR dots between oral and laryngeal SCC with surrounding dysplastic and normal tissues ( P < 0.001) and also between mucoepidermoid carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma with pleomorphic adenoma and normal salivary gland tissue ( P < 0.001).
Conclusion: The silver nitrate staining for NORs is a useful method for aiding the diagnosis of malignant and dysplastic mucosal lesions and also malignant and benign salivary gland tumors.
|How to cite this article:|
Eslami B, Rahimi H, Rahimi F, Khiavi MM, Ebadifar A. Diagnostic value of silver nitrate staining for nucleolar organizer regions in selected head and neck tumors.J Can Res Ther 2006;2:129-131
|How to cite this URL:|
Eslami B, Rahimi H, Rahimi F, Khiavi MM, Ebadifar A. Diagnostic value of silver nitrate staining for nucleolar organizer regions in selected head and neck tumors. J Can Res Ther [serial online] 2006 [cited 2020 Aug 9 ];2:129-131
Available from: http://www.cancerjournal.net/text.asp?2006/2/3/129/27588
Nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) are loops of DNA that encode ribosomal RNA and are considered important in the synthesis of proteins. NORs can be selectively stained by a silver colloid technique and can be visualized as black dots under the transmission microscope. These visualized structures are commonly termed AgNOR dots. The number of AgNORs rises with the increasing proliferative activity of cells. Thus, compared to normal or benign lesions, the number of AgNOR dots in malignant lesions is higher. Due to its simple, quick and convenient nature, this method has been used in histopathologic diagnosis of various benign and malignant human tumors, such as breast, prostate and salivary gland tumors.,,,
In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic value of silver nitrate staining of NORs in SCC of larynx and oral mucosa and also common oral salivary gland tumors.
Materials and methods
In this descriptive cross-sectional study, we used the silver nitrate staining technique on 195 paraffin blocks collected from 85 patients from the archives of Taleghani Hospital (Tehran, Iran). The silver nitrate solution used for staining the samples was produced by mixing 2 g of gelatin in 100 ml of 1% formic acid with two parts of 50% silver nitrate solution in distilled water. The samples consisted of 21 SCC of larynx and 28 SCC of oral mucosa and their surrounding normal and dysplastic tissues, including 36 samples of the most common salivary gland tumors consisting of 12 pleomorphic adenomas, 12 mucoepidermoid carcinomas and 12 adenoid cystic carcinomas with their surrounding normal salivary gland tissues. AgNOR dots were counted by a pathologist with the aid of a graticule using conventional light microscopy with 1000x magnification, assessing the nuclei of 100 cells randomly selected from 10 distinct regions per slide [Figure 1][Figure 2][Figure 3]. Then the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test was performed to analyze the data.
The results are shown in [Table 1]. The statistical analyses performed with Mann-Whitney U-test showed a significant difference in the number of AgNOR dots between oral and laryngeal SCC with dysplastic and normal surrounding tissuesin oral and laryngeal SCC when compared with dysplastic and normal surrounding tissue ( P P P P <0.001).
The results also showed that the AgNOR dots in normal tissue were rounded and small and usually couldn't be detected outside the nuclei, while in the cancerous lesions, the shape of the dots varied and their harmony and equivalency was lost. In malignant lesions, the dots also seemed to localize in one location with increased size and color [Figure 1][Figure 2][Figure 3].
Qualitative and quantitative changes of AgNORs may provide useful information about nucleolar activity in hyperplastic and neoplastic conditions. Although various techniques for evaluating AgNORs have been employed, including enumeration, measurement of surface area and analysis of their distribution patterns, the counting of AgNOR dots is the most widely used method due to its simplicity and easy reproducibility. Variations in size and/or number of AgNOR dots might depend on the stage of the cell cycle, transcriptional and metabolic activity of the cell or the number of NOR-bearing chromosomes in the kariotype.,, In a rapid proliferative cell, the chromosomal and AgNOR distribution remains disorganized with the resultant formation of multiple, small and dispersed nucleoli. Actively proliferating cells have impaired nucleolar association and therefore exhibit a higher AgNOR count, regardless of the ploidy state of the cell. Recent histopathologic studies of NORs have resulted in successful diagnosis, categorization and prognostication of various benign and malignant lesions.,,,,
The authors have found the AgNOR dot count to be useful in histopathological identification of condylar hyperplasia and differentiation of ameloblastomas from odontogenic cysts. However, some authors believe AgNORs reflect only increased cell metabolic and transcriptional activity or that AgNOR counts are related more to the malignant potential of a lesion than to its proliferation ratio, with the latter dependent on the growth fraction or the proportion of cells within the tumor population that are actively proliferating. A variable degree of overlap among groups of studied lesions prevents the use of the AgNOR technique as an absolute criterion. In this study also, the overlap of results prevented the authors from introducing a definite criterion based on the number of AgNOR dots for diagnosis of the studied malignant or dysplastic lesions. It should be also noted that time and temperature of incubation can influence the aggregation of fine AgNOR dots and turn them into larger particles.
The silver nitrate staining for NORs is a useful method for aiding the diagnosis of malignant and dysplastic laryngeal and oral SCC and also malignant and benign salivary gland tumors. The squamous cell carcinoma of mucosa has a higher number of AgNOR dots compared to malignant salivary gland tumors, explaining the possible higher proliferative activity of oral SCC in comparison with malignant salivary gland tumors. The shape, size, location and distribution of AgNOR dots are different in malignant, dysplastic and normal tissues and there is an increase in the number of dots with the advancement of malignancy.
The authors thank Iran Center for Dental Research and Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, for their support in the project.
|1||Uno T, Hashimoto S, Shimono M. A study of the proliferative activity of the long junctional epithelium using argyrophilic nucleolar organizer region (AgNORs) staining. J Periodont Res 1998;33: 298-309.|
|2||Hall PA, Crocke J, Watts A, Stansfield AG. A comparison of Nucleolar Organizer Region staining and Ki-67 immunostaining in non-Hodkins Lymphoma. Histopathology 1988;12:273-81.|
|3||Chatterjee R, Mukhopadhyay D, Chakraborty RN, Mitra RB. Evaluation of Argyrophilic Nucleolar Organizer Regions (AgNORs) in relation to human papilloma virus infection and Cytokinetics. J Oral Pathol Med 1997;26:310-4.|
|4||Ghomette GP, Axriol MM, Labrousse F, Vaillant JM. Mucoepidermoid tumors of salivary glands: Histoprognostic value of NORs stained with AgNORs technique. J Oral Pathol Med 1991;20:130-2.|
|5||Van-Heerden WF, Raubenheimer EJ. Evaluation of the nucleolar organizer region associated proteins in minor salivary gland tumors. J Oral Pathol Med 1991;20:291-5.|
|6||do Carmo M, Silva EC. Argyrophilic Nucleolar Organizer Regions (AgNORs) in ameloblastomas and adenomatoid odontogenic tumors (AOTs). J Oral Pathol Med 1998;27:153-6.|
|7||Morgan DW, Crocker J, Watts A, Shenoi PM. Salivary gland tumors studies by means of the AgNOR technique. Histopathology 1998;13:553-9.|
|8||Ploton D, Menager M, Jeannesson P, Himber G, Pigeon F, Adnet JJ. Improvement in the staining and in the visualization of the argyrophilic proteins of the Nucleolar Organizer Regions at the optical level. Histochem J 1986;18:5-14.|
|9||Alison RT, Spencer S. Nucleolar organiser regions in odontogenic cysts and ameloblastomas. Br J Biomed Sci 1993;50:309-12.|
|10||Sano K, Takahashi H, Fujita S, Inokuchi T, Pe MB, Okabe H, et al . Prognostic implication of silver binding Nucleolar Organizer Regions (AgNORs) in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 1991;20:53-6.|
|11||Landini G. Nucleolar Organizer Regions (NORs) in pleomorphic adenomas of the salivary glands. J Oral Pathol Med 1990;19:257-60.|
|12||Suresh UR, Chawner L, Buckley CH, Fox H. Do AgNORs count reflect cellular ploidy or cellular proliferation? A study of trophoblastic tissue. J Pathol 1990;160:213-5.|
|13||Giri DD, Nottigham JF, Lawry J, Dundas SA, Underwood JC. Silver-binding Nucleolar organizer regions (AgNORs) in benign and malignant breast lesions: Correlation with ploidy and growth phase by DNA flow cytometry. J Pathol 1989;157:307-13.|
|14||Gardner DG. Plexform ameloblastomas: A diagnostic problem with dentigerous cyst. Cancer 1981;18:68-73.|
|15||Shafer WG, Hine MK, Levy BM. A textbook of oral pathology. 4th ed. W.B. Saunders: Philadelphia; 1983. p. 258-317.|
|16||Aguirre A, Takai Y, Meenaghan M, Neiders M, Natiella JR. Lectin histochemistry of ameloblastomas and odontogenic keratocysts. J Oral Pathol Med 1989;18:68-73.|
|17||Wood NK, Kue IM. Pericoronal radiolucencies. In : Wood NK, Goaz PW, editors. Differential diagnosis of oral and maxillofacial lesions. 5th ed. Mosby: St Louis; 1997. p. 279-95.|
|18||Romanczuk W, Steplewska-Masur K Wozniewicz BM, Korczowski R. Lewis antigens and argyrophilic Nucleolar organizer regions staining for assessment of potential malignancy of adenomatous polyps of the gastrointestinal tract in children. Hybridoma 2000;19:269-76.|
|19||Eslami B, Behnia H, Javadi H, Khiabani KS, Saffar AS. histopathologic comparison of normal and hyperplastic condyles. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:711-7.|
|20||Eslami B, Yaghmaei M, Firoozi M, Saffar AS. Nucleolar organizer regions in selected odontogenic lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:187-92.|
|21||Chungpanich S, Smith CJ. Nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) in hyperplastic lesions and squamous cell carcinomas of the oral mucosa. J Dent Res 1989;68:579.|
|22||Serre I, Vielleond A, Schovaert D, Quillard J, Benoit G, Martin E. Quantification of nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) in renal carcinoma. Comparison with the nuclear grade. Prog Urol 1992;2: 196-206.|
|23||Limas C, Biglar A, Bair R, Beruhart P, Reddy P. Proliferative activity of urothelial neoplasms. Comparison of Brdu incorporation, Ki-67 expression and Nucleolar organizer regions. J Clin Pathol 1993;46: 159-65.|
|24||Korkoplopoulou P, Chritodoulou P, Papanicolou A, Thouas-Tsagle E. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Nucleolar organizer regions in CNS tumors: Correlation with histologic type and tumor grade. A comparative study of 82 cases on paraffin sections. Am J Surg Pathol 1993;17:912-9.|