Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 581-586

Tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia versus tumor associated blood eosinophilia: A ratio of diagnostic importance in oral squamous cell carcinoma


Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, ITS-CDSR, Muradnagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Submission13-Dec-2018
Date of Decision14-Feb-2019
Date of Acceptance13-May-2019
Date of Web Publication13-May-2020

Correspondence Address:
Ankita Tandon
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, ITS-CDSR, Muradnagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_848_18

Rights and Permissions
 > Abstract 


Introduction: Eosinophils are multifunctional granulocytes, which play a pivotal role in health and disease. Tumor Associated Tissue Eosinophilia (TATE) has long been evaluated in the diagnosis and progression of oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs). However, their association with Tumor Associated Blood Eosinophilia (TABE) in OSCCs is still far fetched. We, therefore, attempted to evaluate their individual roles and to achieve a ratio between TATE and TABE in order to signify its usage in objectifying the diagnosis.
Materials and Methods: TATE was evaluated using H and E stain per 10 high power fields in 33 previously diagnosed cases of OSCC which were retrieved from department archives. TABE values were achieved from complete blood hemogram reports of patients. TATE/TABE ratio was calculated. All the parameters were clinicopathologically correlated and statistically evaluated using SPSS.
Results: TATE represented higher values in well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (WDSCC) and poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (PDSCC) and was least in moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (MDSCC), whereas TABE linearly increased from WDSCC to PDSCC. TNM Stage II cases revealed the highest TATE and lowest TABE. TATE/TABE ratio was the highest in WDSCC.
Conclusion: Due to the dual nature of eosinophils in early and late carcinogenesis events, evaluation of only TATE might not be conclusive in determining tumor grade. Hence, in a first of its kind attempt, the TATE/TABE ratio may be suitable to achieve a criterion for the determination of tumor grade and may also help to unfold the underlying biologic events.

Keywords: Eosinophils, oral squamous cell carcinoma, tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia, tumor associated blood eosinophilia


How to cite this article:
Verma F, Juneja S, Tandon A, Shetty DC. Tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia versus tumor associated blood eosinophilia: A ratio of diagnostic importance in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Can Res Ther 2020;16:581-6

How to cite this URL:
Verma F, Juneja S, Tandon A, Shetty DC. Tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia versus tumor associated blood eosinophilia: A ratio of diagnostic importance in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Can Res Ther [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 7];16:581-6. Available from: http://www.cancerjournal.net/text.asp?2020/16/3/581/284265




 > Introduction Top


Wharton[1] first described “coarse granule cells” in 1846 which were later referred to as “eosinophils” by Ehrlich.[2] They are bone marrow-derived minority circulating (1%–5%)[3] multifunctional granulocytes.[4],[5]

The spectrum of eosinophil activity in human health and disease has long been focused. Besides their involvement in tissue remodeling and in innate and acquired immune response modulations;[6] they are active participants in pathogenesis of allergic reactions and parasitic infections.[4],[6] Eosinophils are strongly considered among destructive cells with cytotoxic activities which are usually attributed to their granules containing cationic proteins such as the major basic protein, eosinophil cationic protein, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin, and the eosinophil peroxidase.[7],[8]

In the premise of advancing research, the importance of the tumor microenvironment (TME) has outgrown. Collaborative interactions between neoplastic cells and their supporting stroma coalesce to form chronically proliferative (and often disseminating) malignancies.[9] Infiltrating immune cells such as eosinophils supply direct and indirect mitogenic growth mediators that stimulate proliferation of neoplastic cells, as well as educate other stromal cell types to induce paracrine and juxtacrine mitogenic signaling molecules to support neoplastic growth which also appears true for oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs).[9]

In India, OSCCs account for about 30% of all new cases annually and 22.9% of cancer-related deaths. The high-mortality and high-morbidity rates of OSCCs[10] indicate an urgent need of the development of therapeutic targets in the prevention and control of OSCC epidemic.

In evidence of current scientific literature, the association between tissue and blood eosinophilia has not been studied in OSCCs. Tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia (TATE), observed and described in many tumors, including the head-and-neck neoplasia was first described by Prezewoski in 1896 as “eosinophilic stromal infiltration of a tumor not associated with tumor necrosis or ulceration.[11],[12] Furthermore, the term “Tumor-Associated Blood Eosinophilia (TABE)” was given to emphasize the possible clinical and/or biological significance of eosinophils in patients with various malignancies.[13],[14] However, the binal significance of eosinophils in tumor growth and differentiation is the topic of ongoing debate, and several studies have reported inconclusive evidence of the same.

Clinical correlative studies of patients in other human malignancies with either blood or tissue eosinophilia, or both, have suggested that tissue eosinophilia at the tumor sites can be “protective,” whereas blood eosinophilia may be an indicator of tumor metastasis.[11] However, due to the ambiguous evidence of either of the two in oral cancer pathogenesis, the ratio of TATE/TABE in OSCC could be decisive of the pathology.

In light of limited literature available, the current study was designed to correlate the tumor-associated tissue and blood eosinophilia with various clinicopathological parameters of OSCC.


 > Materials and Methods Top


Study samples

The study was conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, after obtaining consent from the Institutional Review Board. The retrospective study sample composed of a total of 33 cases of previously diagnosed OSCC (according to WHO 2005 grading criteria) as well, moderate and poorly differentiated OSCC. Cases with a history of another concomitant primary tumor, history of previous radiotherapy/chemotherapy, known history of diseases interfering with WBC counts, history of recent infectious diseases, tumors with extensive ulceration, or necrosis were excluded from the study sample. Demographic and clinicopathologic data of the patients including age, gender, tumor size (T), nodal status (N), and metastasis (M) were obtained from the records.

Procedure

Tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia

Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded archival tissues were retrieved to obtain 3 μm sections for routine H and E staining. The number of eosinophils was counted per 10 high power fields at X400 magnification and the mean numbers were calculated.

Tumor-associated blood eosinophilia

Peripheral blood eosinophil count was obtained from preoperative complete blood count (CBC) report of patients using Mindray; BC3600, Auto Hematology Analyzer.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 19 (IBM Corp. Released 2010. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). Data were expressed using mean and standard deviation. Differences between the different variables were analyzed using ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis test. Value of P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant, with 95% of the confidence interval.


 > Results Top


Demographic data

A total of 33 cases were included in the study. Mean TATE in patients <50 years was 6.47, which was slightly lower to patients >50 years (6.86) of age. Mean TABE values also showed a similar trend with mean values of 1.9 and 2.2 in patients <50 years and >50 years, respectively.

As per the gender analysis, females showed a lower mean value of TATE (6.76) but a higher TABE (2.78) over males (TATE = 6.79; TABE = 1.86).

Quantitative assessment of Tumor Associated Tissue Eosinophilia (TATE) and Tumor Associated Blood Eosinophilia (TABE) in different grades of oral squamous cell carcinoma

Among the randomly selected cases within the study group, 14 cases belonged to well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (WDSCC), 15 and 4 cases each for moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (MDSCC) and poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (PDSCC). The mean numbers of eosinophils in TATE did not represent a linear gradation from well through moderately differentiated to poorly differentiated cases. A sudden decrease in their count in MDSCC was observed over well and poorly differentiated cases. However, mean TABE demarcated a linear increase from well to PDSCCs [Figure 1]a (P ≤ 0.05).
Figure 1: (a) Mean TATE and TABE values in varying grades of oral squamous cell carcinoma; (b) mean TATE and TABE values in varying clinical stages of oral squamous cell carcinoma

Click here to view


Quantitative assessment of Tumor Associated Tissue Eosinophilia (TATE) and Tumor Associated Blood Eosinophilia (TABE) in different clinical stages of oral squamous cell carcinoma

The study group comprised two cases each of Stage I and II, 9 cases of Stage III and 20 cases of Stage IV OSCC. On comparison of mean values with clinical stages of OSCC, [Figure 1]b suggests the highest TATE and lowest TABE in Stage II OSCC cases (P > 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis test).

Association between the ratio of mean TATE and TABE values in varying stages and grades of oral squamous cell carcinoma

The TATE/TABE ratio, as suggested in [Table 1], is the highest for Stage II and least for Stage III SCCs. TATE/TABE ratio did not attain statistical significance for the stage of tumor. The ratio is also the highest for WDSCC and least for MDSCC (P ≤ 0.05).
Table 1: Ratio of mean TATE and TABE values in varying stages and grades of oral squamous cell carcinoma

Click here to view



 > Discussion Top


OSCC represents 95% of all forms of headandneck cancers and is on the rise globally.[15] The majority of OSCC cases are diagnosed at a late phase,[16] in Stages III or IV,[17] which markedly decreases the chances of survival and leads to a significant deterioration in patient quality of life. Despite the currently available therapeutic strategies, patients present with high mortality[18] and the 5-year survival rate is only 53%.[19]

Well recognized checkpoints mediated through immune system posits that the immune mechanism recognizes malignant cells as foreign agents. Bone marrow-derived myeloid cells such as macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils, mast cells, and dendritic cells infiltrate malignant tumors in large numbers.[20]

Eosinophils are granule containing cells that are 8 μm in diameter, and their nuclei are usually bilobed although three or more lobes are often observed. The eosinophils are characterized by their bright red granules that can be visualized with the dye such as eosin under light microscope.[21] Intact eosinophils can usually be readily detected in tissue sections of tumors that are stained with hematoxylin and eosin or phloxine B.[22]

With regards to TATE analysis, it has been postulated that the initial stages of oral carcinoma are said to be characterized predominantly by T-helper 1 (Th1) response (interleukin [IL]-12 and INF-γ, cellular immunity response). In turn, these T-helper 1 cells release various chemokines among which IL-2 and INF-γ are potent inducers of eotaxin, an eosinophil chemoattractant which binds to CCR3 receptor of eosinophils and recruits more eosinophils to the tumor site. Thus, the tumors associated with Th1 response are said to have a better prognosis.[23],[24] However, in advanced stages of OSCC, with increasing tumor load, lymph node invasion and metastasis, the T-cell function is impaired with higher antibody response. This immune dysregulation is associated with alteration of Th phenotype leading to distinct profiles of cytokines. Tumor cells in cases exhibiting lymph node metastasis and poorer differentiation have higher Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase (IDO) expression.[25] IDO-dependent tryptophan catabolites, including 3-hydroxyanthranilic and quinolinic acids, are known to induce selective apoptosis of Th1 but not Th2 cells, thereby evading immune surveillance. It could, therefore, be rightly said that eosinophils are like a “Double-edged sword in tumor battlefield” that support cell-mediated tumor immunity in early stages while inhibiting the same in advanced stages through IDO and cytokines and promoting tumor angiogenesis [Figure 2]. Besides, eosinophils also act as potent drivers in tumor pathogenetic model. They also activate mast cell and angiogenetic bystander pathways through cytokines and chemokines within the TME, thereby establishing successful crosstalk to facilitate tumor growth and development.[26]
Figure 2: Functional significance of tissue eosinophils

Click here to view


Numerous authors have confirmed the presence of elevated eosinophil counts in invasive squamous cell carcinoma compared to noninvasive tumors of the head-and-neck region.[27],[28] Tostes Oliveira et al.[29] found that intense eosinophilia was strongly associated with advanced stage T3/T4, whereas patients with OSCC in early stages T1/T2 presented absent/mild TATE.

In the present study, we found that the mean numbers of eosinophils per 10 hpf were greatest in PDSCC (9.45) followed by WDSCC (8.77) and least in MDSCC (4.2) [Figure 3]. Although the findings were statistically significant, no positive linear association between advancing grades of SCC could be ascertained. The findings were similar to other studies where no correlation could be established between TATE and tumor histopathologic grade.[30],[31],[32] This could possibly be explained on the basis of the unequal and inconsistent distribution of OSCC cases according to histologic grades in this study.
Figure 3: Tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia (TATE); (a) well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (H and E, X400); (b) moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (H and E, X400); (c) poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (H and E, X400); (d) eosinophils at higher magnification (H and E, X1000)

Click here to view


Furthermore, Iwasaki et al.[33] in gastric cancers recognized marked eosinophilic infiltration more frequently in the poorly differentiated than the well-differentiated adenocarcinomas (P ≤ 0.05) which is similar to the findings of our study. They presumed that some special histologic types of carcinoma may preferentially attract eosinophils into the lesion. However, contrasting results are put forth by Rahrotaban etal.[34] in the head-and-neck neoplasia, who found a significant relation between different tumor grades and the number of eosinophils (P = 0.04). As the tumor grade increase in their sample size and the differentiation of tumor decreased, the number of eosinophils declined. They stated that their results confirmed the anti-tumor activity of eosinophils, which may be attributed to the cytotoxic proteins (major basic protein and eosinophil cationic protein) produced by these granulocytes.

The variability could also be explained on the basis of difference in eosinophil counting method, staining method, and how the number of eosinophils were distributed in the tissue. Furthermore, abnormal and uncommon morphology of eosinophils, particularly in fibrous tissue, and the presence of severe inflammatory infiltration in the samples may pose difficulty in the distinction of these cells when conventional H and E stain is used for their identification.

On the other hand, the mean TABE was also the highest in PDSCC (2.37) followed by MDSCC (2.16) and least in WDSCC (1.78). Although there is a dearth of literature regarding the association between TABE in OSCC, our study found a positive correlation between TABE and OSCC and TABE and TATE. Their higher values in advanced cases signify more recruitment form peripheral blood to the stroma under the influence of eotaxin, IL-3, IL-5 thereby suggesting poor prognosis. It has been speculated that TATE may occur together or separately from TABE. Notably tumors with TATE alone appears to have a better prognosis compared to those without TABE, whereas TABE is associated with tumor spread and poor prognosis.[35]

Since TNM is a well-accepted prognostic factor and the poor prognosis of poorly differentiated OSCCs is well documented, we decided to perform an objective evaluation of the primary tumor size, nodal status, and clinical staging in our cases.

On correlating the clinical staging, we found that the association of these parameters (T, N, M) with the TATE and TABE did not reach statistical significance. TATE was the highest in Stage IV (6.82) and TABE was the highest in Stage III (3.12). Our results for TATE were similar to Peter et al.[36] who reported a statistically significant increase in the eosinophil count with an increase in the size of the tumor. It was hence hypothesized that eosinophils increase with increase in tumor size as they are a part of host connective tissue response.

Our findings were also consistent with the results obtained by Aghbali et al.,[6] Etit et al.[37] who found that the correlation of eosinophil counts with lymph node metastasis in their study were statistically insignificant. Ercan et al.[38] stated that the presence of TATE in their study was not related to N staging in TNM classification.

As discussed previously, the role of eosinophils is binal with the involvement of both Th1 and Th2 type immune responses, thereby supporting TATE with both good[39],[40],[41] and poor[42],[43],[44] prognosis. On the contrary, Lowe et al.[35] mentioned that TATE without tumor associated blood eosinophilia is usually associated with a good prognosis. As per our knowledge, this is the first study which evaluated the TATE/TABE ratio and found a statistically significant association with histopathological grade (P ≤ 0.05) but not with the clinical stage (P > 0.05).


 > Conclusion Top


It may hence be concluded that, in the world of advanced clinical research and ever-increasing usage of evidence-based therapeutic interventions, mere quantifying TATE and TABE in relation to diagnosis and prognosis carries less significance. As regards to pathfinder research in this direction, the ratio of TATE and TABE could provide an objective criterion to determine the biological basis of tumor progression and may carry prognostic significance in future research.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
 > References Top

1.
Wharton JT. The blood-corpuscle considered in its different phases of development in the animal series Memoir 1. Vertebrata Philos Trans R Soc Lond 1846;136:63-87.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ehrlich P. Methodologische Beitrage zur Physiologie und Pathologie der verschiedenen Formen der LeukocyteniZ. Klin Med 1880;1:553-60.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Simon D, Simon HU. Eosinophilic disorders. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007;119:1291-300.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Saraswathi TR, Nalinkumar S, Ranganathan K, Umadevi R, Elizabeth J. Eosinophils in health and disease: An overview. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2003;7:31-3.  Back to cited text no. 4
  [Full text]  
5.
Rodig SJ, Kutok JL. Bone marrow disorders with associated eosinophilia. Diagnostic Histopathology 2009;15:107-15.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Aghbali A, Hosseini SV, Zenouz AT, Halimi M, Sanaat Z, Fattahi S, et al. Tumor-associated tissue and blood eosinophils in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Res Gov 2013;2:2.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Wardlaw AJ, Moqbel R, Kay AB. Eosinophils: Biology and role in disease. Adv Immunol 1995;60:151-266.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Weller PF. Eosinophils: Structure and functions. Curr Opin Immunol 1994;6:85-90.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Hanahan D, Coussens LM. Accessories to the crime: Functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell 2012;21:309-22.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Sahni P, Patel A, Md S, Hallur J, Gujjar PK. Tumor associated tissue eosinophilia in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A histo-chemical analysis. Malays J Med Sci 2015;22:21-5.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Spry C, editor. Eosinophils. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Jain M, Kasetty S, Khan S, Jain NK. Tissue eosinophilia in head and neck squamous neoplasia: An update. Exp Oncol 2014;36:157-61.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Yellapurkar S, Natarajan S, Boaz K, Baliga M, Shetty P, Manaktala N, et al. Tumour-associated tissue eosinophilia in oral squamous cell carcinoma – A boon or a bane? J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:ZC65-8.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Bankur R, Rodrigues C, Anjaly D, Gopinathan PA, Bankur PK. Quantitative analysis of tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia in different histological grades of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Indian J Dent Res 2016;27:463-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
15.
Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:74-108.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Wangsa D, Ryott M, Avall-Lundqvist E, Petersson F, Elmberger G, Luo J, et al. Ki-67 expression predicts locoregional recurrence in stage I oral tongue carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2008;99:1121-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Centelles PV, Seoane-Romero JM, Gómez I, Diz-Dios P, de Melo NS, Seoane J. Timing of oral cancer diagnosis: Implications for prognosis and survival. In: Ogbureke KU, editor. Oral Cancer. InTech; 2012. p. 173-88.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Mehrotra R, Yadav S. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: Etiology, pathogenesis and prognostic value of genomic alterations. Indian J Cancer 2006;43:60-6.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
19.
Rivera C, Venegas B. Histological and molecular aspects of oral squamous cell carcinoma (Review). Oncol Lett 2014;8:7-11.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Murdoch C, Muthana M, Coffelt SB, Lewis CE. The role of myeloid cells in the promotion of tumour angiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 2008;8:618-31.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Lee GR, Foerster J, Lukens J, Paraskevas F, Greer JP, Rodgers GM. Wintrobe's Clinical Haematology. 10th ed., Vol. 2. London: Williams & Wilkins; 1999. p. 351-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Hanker JS, Chandross RJ, Solic JJ, Weatherly NF, Laszlo J, Moore JO, et al. Medusa cells: Cytostructure and cytochemistry of amoeboid eosinophils with pseudopod-like processes. Histochem J 1981;13:905-19.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Samoszuk MK, Nguyen V, Gluzman I, Pham JH. Occult deposition of eosinophil peroxidase in a subset of human breast carcinomas. Am J Pathol 1996;148:701-6.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Agarwal A, Rani M, Saha GK, Valarmathi TM, Bahadur S, Mohanti BK, et al. Disregulated expression of the Th2 cytokine gene in patients with intraoral squamous cell carcinoma. Immunol Invest 2003;32:17-30.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Astigiano S, Morandi B, Costa R, Mastracci L, D'Agostino A, Ratto GB, et al. Eosinophil granulocytes account for indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-mediated immune escape in human non-small cell lung cancer. Neoplasia 2005;7:390-6.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Munitz A, Levi-Schaffer F. Eosinophils: 'new' roles for 'old' cells. Allergy 2004;59:268-75.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Alrawi SJ, Tan D, Stoler DL, Dayton M, Anderson GR, Mojica P, et al. Tissue eosinophilic infiltration: A useful marker for assessing stromal invasion, survival and locoregional recurrence in head and neck squamous neoplasia. Cancer J 2005;11:217-25.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Falconieri G, Luna MA, Pizzolitto S, DeMaglio G, Angione V, Rocco M. Eosinophil-rich squamous carcinoma of the oral cavity: A study of 13 cases and delineation of a possible new microscopic entity. Ann Diagn Pathol 2008;12:322-7.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Tostes Oliveira D, Tjioe KC, Assao A, Sita Faustino SE, Lopes Carvalho A, Landman G, et al. Tissue eosinophilia and its association with tumoral invasion of oral cancer. Int J Surg Pathol 2009;17:244-9.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Tadbir AA, Ashraf MJ, Sardari Y. Prognostic significance of stromal eosinophilic infiltration in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Craniofac Surg 2009;20:287-9.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Alkhabuli JO, High AS. Significance of eosinophil counting in tumor associated tissue eosinophilia (TATE). Oral Oncol 2006;42:849-50.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Joshi PS, Kaijkar MS. A histochemical study of tissue eosinophilia in oral squamous cell carcinoma using Congo red staining. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2013;10:784-9.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Iwasaki K, Torisu M, Fujimura T. Malignant tumor and eosinophils. I. Prognostic significance in gastric cancer. Cancer 1986;58:1321-7.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Rahrotaban S, Jolehar M, Khatibi A. Tissue eosinophilia in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Res Dent Sci 2014;11:90-4.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Lowe D, Jorizzo J, Hutt MS. Tumour-associated eosinophilia: A review. J Clin Pathol 1981;34:1343-8.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Peter CD, Shashidara R, Haragannavar VC, Samuel P, Sridhara SU, Gopalkrishna AH, et al. Assessment of tumour associated tissue eosinophilia (TATE) in oral squamous cell carcinoma using carbol chromotrope stain. Int J Odontostomatol 2015;9:91-5.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Etit D, Yardım BG, Arslanoǧlu S, Bayol U, Cukurova I, Oztürkcan S, et al. Tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia as a prognostic factor in squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;66:186-90.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Ercan I, Cakir B, Başak T, Ozdemir T, Sayin I, Turgut S. Prognostic significance of stromal eosinophilic infiltration in cancer of the larynx. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;132:869-73.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Bethwaite PB, Holloway LJ, Yeong ML, Thornton A. Effect of tumour associated tissue eosinophilia on survival of women with stage IB carcinoma of the uterine cervix. J Clin Pathol 1993;46:1016-20.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Dalal BI, Das KC, Dutta TK, Malakar K. Local and systemic eosinophilia in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix undergoing radiation therapy: Correlation with radiation response. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 1992;4:18-21.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Goldsmith MM, Belchis DA, Cresson DH, Merritt WD 3rd, Askin FB. The importance of the eosinophil in head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;106:27-33.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
van Driel WJ, Kievit-Tyson P, van den Broek LC, Zwinderman AH, Trimbos BJ, Fleuren GJ. Presence of an eosinophilic infiltrate in cervical squamous carcinoma results from a type 2 immune response. Gynecol Oncol 1999;74:188-95.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Horiuchi K, Mishima K, Ohsawa M, Sugimura M, Aozasa K. Prognostic factors for well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma in the oral cavity with emphasis on immunohistochemical evaluation. J Surg Oncol 1993;53:92-6.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Wong DT, Bowen SM, Elovic A, Gallagher GT, Weller PF. Eosinophil ablation and tumor development. Oral Oncol 1999;35:496-501.  Back to cited text no. 44
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  >Abstract>Introduction>Materials and Me...>Results>Discussion>Conclusion>Article Figures>Article Tables
  In this article
>References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed292    
    Printed59    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded64    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]