|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 6 | Page : 1201-1206
Phase I study on pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with docetaxel for patients with platinum-resistant or partially platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer: The Kansai Clinical Oncology Group study
Kensuke Hori1, Kimihiko Ito1, Kentaro Kuritani2, Shiho Kuji3, Naoto Furukawa4, Hiroshi Tsubamoto5, Atsushi Arakawa6
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Japan
3 Department of Gynecology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumichou, Shizuoka, Japan
4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Prefectural Seiwa Medical Center, Ikoma-Gun, Japan
5 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
6 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
|Date of Submission||07-Jul-2016|
|Date of Decision||20-Sep-2017|
|Date of Acceptance||24-Feb-2018|
|Date of Web Publication||24-Dec-2019|
Dr. Kensuke Hori
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Inabasou, Amagasaki, Hyogo
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Context: In platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, single-agent chemotherapy is recommended for the reduction of adverse events. However, in clinical practice, some patients can tolerate drug-specific adverse events.
Aims: We assessed the safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PEG-LD) and docetaxel regimen in the first cycle of ovarian cancer.
Settings and Design: We performed a phase I study to evaluate the combination therapy of PEG-LD and docetaxel.
Materials and Methods: We recruited five patients with recurrent ovarian cancer within 12 months of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. All patients had measurable disease severity. PEG-LD and docetaxel were intravenously administered on day 1 and every 21 days using three dose levels: 25 mg/m2 PEG-LD and 50 mg/m2 docetaxel; 30 mg/m2 PEG-LD and 50 mg/m2 docetaxel; and 30 mg/m2 PEG-LD and 60 mg/m2 docetaxel.
Statistical Analysis Used: We defined the maximum tolerated dose of the combination therapy based on the modified Fibonacci method.
Results: Five patients were enrolled in this study. The median treatment-free interval was 5.5 months. Two dose-limiting toxicities (Grade 4 neutropenia) were observed in two patients. One complete response, one partial response, one stable disease, and two progressive disease cases were observed. The overall response rate was 2/5, and the disease control rate was 3/5. The median overall survival was 7.4 months.
Conclusions: We determined that 25 mg/m2 of PEG-LD and 50 mg/m2 of docetaxel were safe and effective doses. This preliminary efficacy and safety data should be further investigated in a Phase II trial.
Keywords: Docetaxel, ovarian cancer, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, platinum resistance, platinum sensitivity, therapeutic dose
|How to cite this article:|
Hori K, Ito K, Kuritani K, Kuji S, Furukawa N, Tsubamoto H, Arakawa A. Phase I study on pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with docetaxel for patients with platinum-resistant or partially platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer: The Kansai Clinical Oncology Group study. J Can Res Ther 2019;15:1201-6
|How to cite this URL:|
Hori K, Ito K, Kuritani K, Kuji S, Furukawa N, Tsubamoto H, Arakawa A. Phase I study on pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with docetaxel for patients with platinum-resistant or partially platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer: The Kansai Clinical Oncology Group study. J Can Res Ther [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Feb 24];15:1201-6. Available from: http://www.cancerjournal.net/text.asp?2019/15/6/1201/243493
| > Introduction|| |
Combined chemotherapy using taxane and platinum is currently the standard initial treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer. The time to recurrence after the completion of initial chemotherapy, i. e., treatment-free interval (TFI) can be correlated with the response rate (RR). In general, TFI for drug susceptibility is <1 month, whereas TFI of 6 months indicates drug resistance. In addition, cases with TFI of ≤12 months were less sensitive to chemotherapy compared with those with TFI of ≥12 months.
The addition of platinum-based regimen to standard chemotherapy has been recommended for the relapse of platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. In cases of platinum resistance, no significant difference between a multidrug and single-agent regimen was observed in prolonging life or RR in past trials. In addition, single-agent chemotherapy is the treatment of choice when aiming for the reduction of adverse events. The selection of an agent for platinum-resistant cases is dependent on the absence of cross-resistance to the initial treatment.,, However, in clinical practice, some patients can tolerate drug-specific adverse events. The agents recommended for platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer relapse are paclitaxel, docetaxel, irinotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PEG-LD), topotecan, gemcitabine, and oral etoposide in the United States and Japan.,,,,,,,,,
The addition of PEG-LD to standard chemotherapy is recommended by the British Ovarian Cancer Treatment Guidelines not only for platinum-resistant cases but also for those with intermediate sensitivity. PEG-LD is an anthracycline agent that selectively targets the tumor organizational liposome. Conventional doxorubicin is no longer used for chemotherapy because of its alopecia effect and toxicity to the heart, digestive organs, and blood., Previous clinical trials have reported that PEG-LD has no cross-tolerance with other chemotherapeutic agents for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. In addition, PEG-LD is not significantly different from paclitaxel, topotecan, and gemcitabine in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Furthermore, the management of adverse events, such as hand–foot syndrome (HFS) and stomatitis, is relatively easy. The toxicity profile of PEG-LD does not overlap with that of other agents that are currently used in Japan.,
In other countries, PEG-LD has been identified as the standard therapeutic agent for recurrent platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer; however, its use in Japan was only authorized in April 2009. The recommended dose (RD) of PEG-LD is 50 mg/m 2 given intravenously every 4 weeks. However, HFS (Grades 1–3), which was the main adverse event, occurred in 48%. In the only retrospective study available for PEG-LD, the effective dose was found to be 30–40 mg/m 2. Moreover, compared with the 50 mg/m 2 dose, the 40 mg/m 2 dose had similar OS and PFS but fewer adverse events. Since the year 2000, few clinical trials comparing the anticancer spectrum and toxicity profile of combination therapy with PEG-LD and docetaxel have been conducted, mainly for breast cancer. Kouroussis et al. reported that the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 35 mg/m 2/week for docetaxel and 14 mg/m 2/week for PEG-LD in a Phase I study of patients with solid tumor. The combination therapeutic overall response in that study was reported to be 22.7%., Recently, Sparano et al. performed a Phase III clinical trial on 751 patients with progressing breast cancer. They reported that a combination therapy of 60 mg/m 2 docetaxel and 30 mg/m 2 PLD→PEG-LD given every 3 weeks improved the time to progression (TTP) and RR compared with 75 mg/m 2 docetaxel given as a single agent every 3 weeks.,
On the basis of the hypothesis that the toxicity profile and anticancer spectrum of docetaxel differ from those of PEG-LD, we aimed to perform a Phase I trial on the efficacy of combination therapy with PLD and docetaxel, compared with single-agent PEG-LD regimen, for patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer in Japan.
| > Materials and Methods|| |
Study protocol, ethics committee approval, and informed consent
For the purpose of evaluating the combination therapy of PEG-LD and docetaxel, the member institutions of the Kansai Clinical Oncology Group (KCOG) assigned patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian and peritoneal carcinomas between January 2010 and March 2011 into the KCOG protocol (KCOG-G0901). Approval for this study was granted by the Local Ethics Committees of KCOG, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nara Medical University, Hyogo Medical College, and Nagoya Municipal University. All patients who participated in this study provided written informed consent after a thorough explanation of the contents of the study and provision of other explanatory documents.
All patients were required to meet the following criteria: (1) histologic or cytologic diagnosis of Mullerian carcinoma (epithelial ovarian carcinoma, Fallopian tube More Details carcinoma, or primary peritoneal carcinoma); (2) recurrence within 12 months after the final course of the first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (including recurrence identified by tumor markers); and (3) ECOG performance status of 0–2. To be eligible to receive first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, patients had to be at least 20 years old and not older than 75 years old at the time of enrollment. In addition, patients who met the following criteria were included: hemoglobin >9.0 g/dL, white blood cell count 3000–12,000/mm 3, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1500/mm 3, platelet count ≥100,000/mm 3, aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase ≤2.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), alkaline phosphatase ≤2.5 times ULN, bilirubin <1.2 mg/dL, serum creatinine ≤1.5 times ULN, cardiac function with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% and electrocardiogram within normal limits, and no symptoms requiring treatment. The patients were expected to survive for at least 3 months and should not have received chemotherapy for more than 4 weeks.
The principal investigator or subinvestigator excluded the following patients: (1) patients with severe complications or active systemic infection that may affect the administration and proper assessment of the drugs; (2) patients with multiple synchronous and metachronous cancers within 5 years of disease-free interval, with the exceptions of basal and squamous cell carcinoma, carcinoma in situ, and intramucosal carcinoma-like lesions, which are curable by local treatment; (3) patients with angina or myocardial infarction within the last 90 days (day 1 was defined as the day before enrollment); (4) patients who had symptomatic brain metastases that required the administration of steroids or anti-inflammatory agents; (5) patients who have received bone marrow transplant, hematopoietic stem cell transplant, or high-dose chemotherapy; (6) patients who have received prior chemotherapy consisting of anthracycline, including PLD, or docetaxel; (7) patients with a history of hypersensitivity to the components of anthracycline, taxane, or liposomal doxorubicin (mPEG-DSPE, hydrogenated lecithin, cholesterol, ammonium sulfate, histidine, sucrose, hydrochloric acid, and sodium hydroxide); and (8) patients who were or suspected to be pregnant or lactating.
The patients were required to undergo medical history interview, physical examination, and laboratory tests within 14 days of starting the treatment. Toxicity assessment using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 (CTCAE v. 3.0) and complete blood count were obtained weekly. Tumor measurements and tumor markers, when applicable, were examined after one or two cycles of chemotherapy. Adverse events were reported and recorded as they occurred.
On day 1 of a 21-day cycle, PEG-LD and docetaxel were given in combination as an intravenous infusion for 1 h. This study arm was created to assess the toxicity of each sequential dose setting [Table 1]. This design began with the treatment of the first patient at a Level 1 dose. If the next three patients did not experience (DLT), dose escalation continued. Additional patients were enrolled at the same dose level on the basis of the classic modified Fibonacci scheme.
DLT was defined as (1) Grade 4 neutropenia lasting longer than 7 days; (2) Grade 4 thrombocytopenia; (3) any Grade 3 or Grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity, except nausea, emesis, anorexia, alopecia, anaphylaxis, and infusion reaction; (4) serum bilirubin of ≥3.0 mg/dL; or (5) any episode of febrile neutropenia.
Treatment was delayed by 1 week for patients with ANC ≤1500 cells/mm 3, at least Grade 2 stomatitis, at least Grade 2 HFS, or platelet count ≤100,000 cells/mm 3. Both PEG-LD and docetaxel doses were reduced by 25% if a patient's nadir values for ANC were <500 cells/mm 3 and for platelet count were <25,000 cells/mm 3 as well as for those with Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities, except for fatigue, nausea, emesis, anorexia, alopecia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, and infusion reaction. PEG-LD dose was reduced by 25% for Grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) and Grade 3/4 stomatitis. Therapy was discontinued in cases of voluntary patient withdrawal, development of clinical congestive heart failure (LVEF of <45% or a decrease of 20% or more from pretreatment value), two dose reductions, cumulative anthracycline level of ≥500 mg/m 2 with PEG-LD, prolonged Grade 2 infusion reaction within 24 h of administration, or disease progression or at the discretion of the treating physician.
Response assessment was based on guidelines set forth in the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. For the assessment of safety and toxicity, we used CTCAE (version 3.0). The primary objective was to determine RD of PEG-LD in combination with docetaxel. MTD was used to determine RDs of PEG-LD and docetaxel. The secondary objective was to evaluate the best overall response (RR) and safety of PEG-LD in combination with docetaxel.
| > Results|| |
Six patients were enrolled in the study between January 2010 and March 2011. The baseline characteristics, dose levels, total number of cycles, and OS are listed in [Table 2]. One patient, designated as patient 5, dropped out because of an improper regimen administered by the treating physician. Two patients who were enrolled at dose Level 1 experienced DLTs, such as Grade 4 neutropenia, whereas three patients who were enrolled at dose Level 0 did not experience DLT. MTD for this study arm was dose Level 0.
|Table 2: Patient characteristics, dose level, total cycles, and overall survival|
Click here to view
[Table 3] presents the severity of hematologic toxicities for all patients in the entire study arm. There were no Grade 2–4 thrombocytopenia and Grade 3–4 anemia observed in any patient. [Table 4] shows the most common nonhematologic toxicities for each patient. Grade 2 toxicities were uncommon, and no Grade 3–4 toxicities occurred. The antitumor response of patients in this study arm is shown in [Table 2] and [Table 5]. One complete response was documented in a patient who was enrolled at dose Level 1. One partial response was documented in a patient who was enrolled at dose Level 0. RR was 2/5 (40%), the disease control rate was 3/5 (60%), and the median OS time was 7.4 months (range, 4.5–15.4 months). After experiencing DLT and dropping out of this study, two patients who were enrolled at dose Level 1 continued to undergo treatment at reduced doses for nine or four cycles.
|Table 4: The worse grade of nonhematological toxicities for each patient|
Click here to view
| > Discussion|| |
This small preliminary Phase I study evaluated the safety profile and MTD of combination therapy with PEG-LD and docetaxel administered every 21 days to patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian and peritoneal carcinomas. We demonstrated that this combination regimen was feasible with minimal hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities. Grade 4 neutropenia was considered DLT. MTD was 25 mg/m 2 PEG-LD, followed by 50 mg/m 2 docetaxel on day 1 and every 21 days thereafter.
Studies on the combination of PEG-LD and docetaxel for other malignancies, including breast cancer, have been published since 2000. In 2003, Fracasso et al. reported their Phase I study on advanced malignancy in 22 patients who were enrolled in two treatment arms. In their accelerated, dose escalation trial, Arm A comprised PEG-LD followed by docetaxel on days 1 and 15 every 28 days, whereas Arm B comprised docetaxel followed by PEG-LD on days 1 and 15 every 28 days. Patients enrolled in that study had malignancies other than ovarian cancer, whereas all patients in our study had only ovarian cancer. Our study was conducted in only one arm, which was PEG-LD followed by docetaxel; this is because myelosuppression when doxorubicin is followed by paclitaxel is less severe compared with that when paclitaxel is followed by doxorubicin. Moreover, paclitaxel may increase the concentration of unchanged doxorubicin.
Recently, Sparano et al. reported a Phase III trial in which they compared docetaxel (75 mg/m 2) given as a single agent every 3 weeks with a combination of docetaxel (60 mg/m 2) and PEG-LD (30 mg/m 2) given every 3 weeks. Their results indicated that the addition of PEG-LD to docetaxel was superior to docetaxel alone in terms of TTP and RR. The percentage of Grade 3/4 neutropenia in patients who received combination treatment and docetaxel alone was 66% and 65%, respectively. Grade 3/4 PPEs occurred in 24% patients enrolled in this trial. On the basis of previous studies, we concluded that the toxicities were acceptable.,
Since the toxicity profiles and anticancer spectrum of PEG-LD and docetaxel are considerably distinct, only Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in the trial reported by Sparano et al.; however, all patients continued to experience other Grade 1–2 hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities. The low incidence of adverse events observed in our study may be related to the dosage of PLD. RD of PLD alone for patients with ovarian cancer is limited to 50 mg/m 2 on day 1 and every 28 days thereafter. Grade 1–3 PPE was the main consequence of PEG-LD toxicity and occurred in 48% patients. In a Japanese Phase II trial, PPEs occurred in 78.4% patients treated with 50 mg/m 2 PEG-LD every 28 days. PPEs caused delayed PEG-LD treatment in 40.8% patients, and 4.1% patients stopped participating in the trial. The efficacy of PEG-LD at a dose of 30–40 mg/m 2 every 28 days was identified in previous retrospective studies. In particular, there was no significant difference between the 40 and 50 mg/m 2 PEG-LD doses in terms of RR, PFS, and OS as well as DLT. Our findings, coupled with those of previous studies, demonstrated that if PEG-LD was administered at a dose of 10 mg/m 2 per week, the efficiency of prolonging the survival is improved and toxicity is reduced.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the only Phase I trial that utilized the day 1 schedule of the administration of this combination therapy every 21 days to treat relapse of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Sparano et al. conducted their Phase I study of PEG-LD and docetaxel in patients with advanced breast carcinoma using a 21-day schedule. In that study, MTD was 30 mg/m 2 PEG-LD and 60 mg/m 2 docetaxel. At these MTDs, 60% patients experienced Grade 3–4 neutropenia and 13% experienced Grade 3–4 stomatitis and PPEs; DLT of this regimen was febrile neutropenia. With the addition of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor, MTD was 30 mg/m 2 PEG-LD and 75 mg/m 2 docetaxel every 28 days. Of 29 patients who received this regimen, 55% showed response to the treatment. Previous reports that used various other schedules have shown serious myelosuppression, mucositis, and skin toxicities., MTD of our study ameliorated the hematologic and nonhematologic complications observed in these previous studies.
| > Conclusion|| |
The administration of 25 mg/m 2 PEG-LD, followed by 50 mg/m 2 docetaxel, on day 1 and every 21 days thereafter in patients with platinum-resistant or partially platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer appeared to be a well-tolerated regimen with acceptable toxicities. RR was 40%, and the disease control rate was 60%. The median OS time was 7.4 months (range, 4.5–15.4 months). These results, coupled with those of other studies, warrant Phase II trials of this treatment combination in patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Based on the findings of our study, new molecular targeted drugs such as bevacizumab, veliparib, and olaparib may be effective in treating gynecological cancer. To confirm this, our group has initiated a Phase II study of cisplatin-based chemotherapy using gemcitabine and bevacizumab (KCOG-G-1601 trial; UMIN000023097).
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| > References|| |
Pujade-Lauraine E, Paraiso D, Cure H, Germann N, Lortholary A, Lucas V. Predicting the effectiveness of chemotherapy in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer: A GINECO study. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002;21:208a.
Buda A, Floriani I, Rossi R, Colombo N, Torri V, Conte PF, et al
. Randomised controlled trial comparing single agent paclitaxel vs epidoxorubicin plus paclitaxel in patients with advanced ovarian cancer in early progression after platinum-based chemotherapy: An Italian collaborative study from the mario negri institute, milan, G.O.N.O. (Gruppo oncologico nord ovest) group and I.O.R. (Istituto oncologico romagnolo) group. Br J Cancer 2004;90:2112-7.
Sehouli J, Stengel D, Oskay-Oezcelik G, Zeimet AG, Sommer H, Klare P, et al
. Nonplatinum topotecan combinations versus topotecan alone for recurrent ovarian cancer: Results of a phase III study of the North-Eastern German society of gynecological oncology ovarian cancer study group. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:3176-82.
Orlando M, Costanzo MV, Chacon RD, Tajer CD. Randomized trials of combination chemotherapy (combo) versus monotherapy (mono) in relapsed ovarian carcinoma (ROC): A meta-analysis of published data journal of clinical oncology, 2007. ASCO Ann Meet Proc Post Meet Ed 2007;25:5524.
Gordon AN, Tonda M, Sun S, Rackoff W; Doxil Study 30-49 Investigators. Long-term survival advantage for women treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin compared with topotecan in a phase 3 randomized study of recurrent and refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004;95:1-8.
ten Bokkel Huinink W, Lane SR, Ross GA; International Topotecan Study Group. Long-term survival in a phase III, randomised study of topotecan versus paclitaxel in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2004;15:100-3.
Mutch DG, Orlando M, Goss T, Teneriello MG, Gordon AN, McMeekin SD, et al
. Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine compared with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:2811-8.
Ferrandina G, Ludovisi M, Lorusso D, Pignata S, Breda E, Savarese A, et al
. Phase III trial of gemcitabine compared with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in progressive or recurrent ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:890-6.
Gordon AN, Granai CO, Rose PG, Hainsworth J, Lopez A, Weissman C, et al
. Phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin in platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:3093-100.
Matsumoto K, Katsumata N, Yamanaka Y, Yonemori K, Kohno T, Shimizu C, et al
. The safety and efficacy of the weekly dosing of irinotecan for platinum- and taxanes-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2006;100:412-6.
Markman M, Hall J, Spitz D, Weiner S, Carson L, Van Le L, et al
. Phase II trial of weekly single-agent paclitaxel in platinum/paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:2365-9.
Verschraegen CF, Sittisomwong T, Kudelka AP, Guedes Ed, Steger M, Nelson-Taylor T, et al
. Docetaxel for patients with paclitaxel-resistant Müllerian carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2733-9.
Katsumata N, Tsunematsu R, Tanaka K, Terashima Y, Ogita S, Hoshiai H, et al
. A phase II trial of docetaxel in platinum pre-treated patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A Japanese cooperative study. Ann Oncol 2000;11:1531-6.
Rose PG, Blessing JA, Mayer AR, Homesley HD. Prolonged oral etoposide as second-line therapy for platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive ovarian carcinoma: A Gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:405-10.
Vaage J, Barberá-Guillem E, Abra R, Huang A, Working P. Tissue distribution and therapeutic effect of intravenous free or encapsulated liposomal doxorubicin on human prostate carcinoma xenografts. Cancer 1994;73:1478-84.
O'Brien ME, Wigler N, Inbar M, Rosso R, Grischke E, Santoro A, et al
. Reduced cardiotoxicity and comparable efficacy in a phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (CAELYX/Doxil) versus conventional doxorubicin for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2004;15:440-9.
O'Byrne KJ, Bliss P, Graham JD, Gerber J, Vasey PA, Khanna S. A phase II study of doxil/caelyx versus paclitaxel in platinum-treated, taxane-naïve relapsed ovarian cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002;21:203a.
Nakayama M, Kobayashi H, Takahara T, Nishimura Y, Fukushima K, Yoshizawa K, et al
. A comparison of overall survival with 40 and 50 mg/m2 pegylated liposomal doxorubicin treatment in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: Propensity score-matched analysis of real-world data. Gynecol Oncol 2016;143:246-51.
Katsumata N, Fujiwara Y, Kamura T, Nakanishi T, Hatae M, Aoki D, et al
. A phase II study confirmed that a 50 mg/m2 every 4 weeks regimen of PLD was safe and effective in Japanese patients with Müllerian carcinoma (epithelial ovarian carcinoma, primary carcinoma of fallopian tube, peritoneal carcinoma) having a therapeutic history of platinum-based chemotherapy: A Phase II study of the Japanese gynecologic oncology group. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2008;38:777-85.
Fracasso PM, Rodriguez LC, Herzog TJ, Fears CL, Goodner SA, Govindan R, et al
. Phase I dose and sequencing study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and docetaxel in patients with advanced malignancies. Cancer 2003;98:610-7.
Kouroussis C, Androulakis N, Vamvakas L, Kalykaki A, Spiridonakou S, Kentepozidis N, et al
. Phase I study of weekly docetaxel and liposomal doxorubicin in 354 patients with advanced solid tumors. Oncology 2005;69:202-7.
Sparano JA, Malik U, Rajdev L, Sarta C, Hopkins U, Wolff AC, et al
. Phase I trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and docetaxel in advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:3117-25.
Sparano JA, Makhson AN, Semiglazov VF, Tjulandin SA, Balashova OI, Bondarenko IN, et al
. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus docetaxel significantly improves time to progression without additive cardiotoxicity compared with docetaxel monotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer previously treated with neoadjuvant-adjuvant anthracycline therapy: Results from a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:4522-9.
Penel N, Kramar A. What does a modified-fibonacci dose-escalation actually correspond to? BMC Med Res Methodol 2012;12:103.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]