Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 807-812

Clinical efficacy of computed tomography-guided iodine-125 seed implantation therapy for patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: A retrospective study


1 Cancer Center, Institute of Surgery Research, Third Affiliated Hospital, The Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
2 Treatment Center of Minimally Invasive Intervention and Radioactive Particles, Southwest Hospital, The Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
3 Department of Radiology, PLA No. 452 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China

Correspondence Address:
Xue-Quan Huang
Treatment Center of Minimally Invasive Intervention and Radioactive Particles, Southwest Hospital, the Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038
China
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_750_17

Rights and Permissions

Background: This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided radioactive iodine-125 (125 I) seed implantation in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). Materials and Methods: A cohort of 22 patients with MESCC were retrospectively enrolled. All patients underwent CT-guided 125 I seed implantation therapy via standard procedures. Clinical indexes, including the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDA) criteria for tumor responses, numerical rating scale (NRS) for the degree of pain, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) for quality of life, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale, grade of ESCC, and radiation dose, were evaluated and recorded pre- and post-operation. A follow-up evaluation was performed at least 3 months after the operation. Finally, pre- and post-operative differences in these clinical indexes were compared. Overall survival was recorded. Results: Operations were successfully performed on all patients. A median of 48 (range, 7–103) seeds were implanted in lesions, and the postoperative target verified dose D90 was 11,072.4 ± 1773.5 cGy. Patients were followed for a median of 6 months (range, 3–38 months). The median survival time was 10 months; the response rate was 18/22 (82%); the local control rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 91.3%, 81.9%, and 81.9%, respectively; and the survival rates were 80%, 50.0%, and 21.9% at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. The ESCC grade was significantly lower (P < 0.05). Based on the ASIA impairment scale, the nerve functional reservation, recovery, and decline rates were 63.7% (14/22), 27.3% (6/22), and 9% (2/22), respectively. The NRS and KPS were both significantly improved in the 3rd month of follow-up (P < 0.05). Conclusion: CT-guided 125 I seed implantation represents an effective and safe palliative care for patients with MESCC, which can effectively relieve pain and spinal cord compression and improve nerve function and quality of life.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed317    
    Printed8    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded11    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal