Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 994-999

Investigating different computed tomography techniques for internal target volume definition


1 Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 School of Physics, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence Address:
Mr. S A Yoganathan
Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rae Bareli Road, Lucknow - 226 014, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.220353

Rights and Permissions

Purpose: The aim of this work was to evaluate the various computed tomography (CT) techniques such as fast CT, slow CT, breath-hold (BH) CT, full-fan cone beam CT (FF-CBCT), half-fan CBCT (HF-CBCT), and average CT for delineation of internal target volume (ITV). In addition, these ITVs were compared against four-dimensional CT (4DCT) ITVs. Materials and Methods: Three-dimensional target motion was simulated using dynamic thorax phantom with target insert of diameter 3 cm for ten respiration data. CT images were acquired using a commercially available multislice CT scanner, and the CBCT images were acquired using On-Board-Imager. Average CT was generated by averaging 10 phases of 4DCT. ITVs were delineated for each CT by contouring the volume of the target ball; 4DCT ITVs were generated by merging all 10 phases target volumes. Incase of BH-CT, ITV was derived by boolean of CT phases 0%, 50%, and fast CT target volumes. Results: ITVs determined by all CT and CBCT scans were significantly smaller (P < 0.05) than the 4DCT ITV, whereas there was no significant difference between average CT and 4DCT ITVs (P = 0.17). Fast CT had the maximum deviation (−46.1% ± 20.9%) followed by slow CT (−34.3% ± 11.0%) and FF-CBCT scans (−26.3% ± 8.7%). However, HF-CBCT scans (−12.9% ± 4.4%) and BH-CT scans (−11.1% ± 8.5%) resulted in almost similar deviation. On the contrary, average CT had the least deviation (−4.7% ± 9.8%). Conclusions: When comparing with 4DCT, all the CT techniques underestimated ITV. In the absence of 4DCT, the HF-CBCT target volumes with appropriate margin may be a reasonable approach for defining the ITV.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1130    
    Printed25    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded64    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal