Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 528-534

Anesthesia and cancer recurrences: The current knowledge and evidence


1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Gian Sagar Medical College and Hospital, Ramnagar, Rajpura, Punjab, India
2 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Maharishi Markendeshwar Medical College and Hospital Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication9-Oct-2015

Correspondence Address:
Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, House No. 27-A, Ratan Nagar, Tripuri, Patiala - 147 001, Punjab
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.157321

Rights and Permissions
 > Abstract 

Surgical removal of solid tumors is of utmost importance as total resection can be curative. The surgical insult however itself may result in tumor micrometastasis coupled with depression of cell-mediated immunity culminating in tumor recurrence. Recent research suggests that few anesthetic agents or procedures can influence pathophysiology of metastasis in the postoperative period. Whereas opioids and volatile anesthetics have been implicated in angiogenesis and immunosuppression, evidences accumulated over the recent years have undoubtedly highlighted the attenuation of immunosuppression by regional anesthetic agents thereby making it superior over general anesthesia in preventing cancer recurrence. As anesthetic drugs are given at that time when patient is at the maximum risk of spread of metastasis, thus an understanding of the effect of anesthesia drugs and their impact on tumor metastasis is important so that appropriate anesthetic strategy can be made to improve long term survival in these patients. The purpose of the present review is therefore to emphasize the pivotal role of various anesthetic agents and anesthesia techniques in preventing tumor recurrence after surgery.

Keywords: Cancer, cancer recurrence, general anesthesia, immunosuppression, regional anesthesia


How to cite this article:
Bajwa SS, Anand S, Kaur G. Anesthesia and cancer recurrences: The current knowledge and evidence. J Can Res Ther 2015;11:528-34

How to cite this URL:
Bajwa SS, Anand S, Kaur G. Anesthesia and cancer recurrences: The current knowledge and evidence. J Can Res Ther [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Nov 22];11:528-34. Available from: http://www.cancerjournal.net/text.asp?2015/11/3/528/157321


 > Introduction Top


In spite of breakthrough in oncology, cancer still remains one of the important silent killers. Recurrence is the major cause of mortality. It has been estimated that about 9 million newer cases of cancer are diagnosed annually, worldwide, with overall mortality of 4.5 million. In India itself, 7 lakh newer cases of cancer are diagnosed per year, with 3.5 lakh annual deaths. Although cancer spares no age, increasing age is undoubtedly an important risk factor; 75% cancers developing above 55 years of age. [1] The increasing incidence of cancer puts an enormous responsibility on the anesthesiologist, not only during perioperative period but also during chronic cancer pain management. Surgical stress coupled with subsequent neuroendocrine and inflammatory responses culminating in attenuation of cell-mediated immunity makes the perioperative period most vulnerable for tumor metastasis. [2],[3] In fact, the type of anesthesia technique employed also influences cancer recurrence, thereby laying an equal onus on the anesthesiologist in long term tumor outcome.


 > Search strategies Top


The present review is compiled to highlight the understanding of the effect of anesthesia drugs and their impact on tumor metastasis. The measures adopted included extensive scrutiny of literary evidence from internet resources, journals and textbooks of medicine, oncology, anesthesiology and intensive care. The strategies included exploration of full text articles and abstracts from various search engines such as PubMed, Medscape, Scopus, Science Direct, Medline, Yahoo, Google Scholar and many others which included key words like Cancer, Immunosuppression, General anesthesia, Regional anesthesia, Cancer recurrence.


 > Biology of cancer metastasis Top


Cancer results from the abnormal, unregulated proliferation of cells that can invade other tissues through blood and lymphatics. As per the 'seed and soil' theory of tumor metastasis, there is initial progressive cellular growth and proliferation, during which the nutrient supply of the cells is catered by diffusion. [4] However as the cellular proliferation becomes extensive, angiogenesis commences in response to the release of vascular endothelial growth factor and prostaglandin E 2 , released from the tumor cells. [5] These cells can encroach the surrounding host stroma and enter circulation via lymphatics and blood stream, from where they can embolize to faraway sites, become entrapped in capillary beds or extravasate into the organ parenchyma, where they again proliferate and thereby repeat the cycle. [6]


 > Immune response and cancer Top


Immune response particularly the cell mediated immunity comprising of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, natural killer (NK) cells, NK-T-cells, dendritic cells and macrophages has a pivotal role in keeping a check on cancerous cells. [7] NK cells are particularly critical defense against tumor cells and a decrease in their numbers has been associated with significant increase in the tumor recurrence, as has been substantiated by various animal studies. [8],[9] Interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-10, interferon (INF) γ as well as T helper 1 (Th1) cytokines enhance the cytotoxic potential of T- and NK cells. [10] Cytotoxic T-cells have also been implicated as a protective defense against tumor metastasis, as also the mononuclear cells and the dendritic cells. [11] This has been further corroborated by the fact that the incidence of tumor metastasis escalates in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy e.g., organ transplant recipients, patients of multiplemyeloma, melanoma, breast carcinomas, Wilm's tumor and colorectal cancers. [12] Interleukin 17 (IL-17), another cytokine produced by Th 17 cells, on the contrary, not only stimulates tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, tumor spread but has also been implicated in immune resistance and chemoresistance. [13]


 > Effect of surgery on tumor cell metastasis Top


Though surgery has been considered as a vital treatment modality against primary tumor, paradoxically it has deleterious effects in tumor metastasis. Various mechanisms of how surgery affects tumor metastasis have been postulated based on literary evidence [Table 1].
Table 1: Perioperative factors affecting tumor metastasis

Click here to view


It has been found that mechanical manipulation of the primary tumor results in shedding of the tumor cells into the circulation, leading to tumor spread. [14] Also surgery is associated with increased proliferation and depressed apoptosis of tumor cells, [15] increased motility and invasion by free malignant cells by evoking the release of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP's) [16] and by augmenting angiogenesis. [17] Additional perioperative factors implicated in tumor metastasis include blood transfusion, pain, severe hypothermia and depression of cell mediated immunity during surgery. [18],[19],[20] Allogenic leukocytes in transfused blood suppress T lymphocytes and NK cells. Stored red blood cells alter membrane determinants, preoccupying effector cells and thus tumor cells are left unattended. Also it has been concluded from the previous studies that transfusion is less harmful than stored blood in view of progressing malignancies. Pain suppresses NK cell activity. Hypothermia increases glucocorticoid release and depresses both cell mediated and humoral immunity. Psychological stress with added surgical stress causes enhanced secretion of stress hormones, which in turn induces tumor progression and increased cancer mortality. [21] Studies also show that NK cells mediate effects of stress on tumor development. [9] Surgical stress promotes angiogenesis in vivo and these effects can be blocked with propranolol. [21] Beta antagonism along with COX (cyclooxygenase) inhibition and immunostimulation have shown synergistic effects. [3] Also lesser invasive procedure like laparoscopy is associated with lesser suppression of immunity and subsequent lesser recurrence rate than laparotomy. [22]


 > Effect of anesthesia on tumor cell metastasis Top


Evidences accumulated over the years have thrown insight into the importance of regional anesthesia over general anesthesia in attenuating tumor metastasis, thereby having favorable long term outcome.


 > Effects of general anesthetic agents Top


Intravenous anesthetic agents

It has been found that ketamine by inhibiting the NK cell activity induced by its sympathomimetic activity results in adverse oncological outcome. [10] Infact experimental studies have shown that risk of tumor metastasis with ketamine is more than 2.5 fold. [23] Thiopental also accentuates cancer recrudesce by significantly decreasing number of circulating natural killer cells per milliliter of blood. [23] Both these agents reduce number and activity of NK cells. Propofol on the contrary by inhibiting matrix MMP attenuates the tumor cells ability to invade and spread. [24] MMP is the key enzyme involved in breakdown of basement membrane and thus promoting metastasis. Isoflurane upregulates HIF-1 alpha in prostate cancer cells due to increase in markers and mediators of angiogenesis, proliferation and chemoresistance. Addition of propofol on isoflurane treatment suppresses all of those effects. [25] The effect of benzodiazepines on tumor recrudesce is controversial [Table 2]. Whereas some studies show a positive correlation, others have refuted the same. [26],[27]
Table 2: Effects of general anesthetic agents on tumor recurrence

Click here to view


Inhalational agents

Volatile anesthetic agents have been found to induce apoptosis of immune competent cells like NK cells and human T-lymphocytes and have a deleterious effect on tumor metastasis. Halogenated inhalational anesthetic agents by inducing hypoxia-inducible-factor 1α (HIF-1α) in neoplastic cells, augments angiogenesis with subsequently poor outcome. [28] HIFs are the transcription factors which regulate various genes that control proliferation, angiogenesis and metabolism. This factor is essential for survival of healthy cells and is also co-opted by cancer cells to promote their survival. Upregulation of HIF has a direct corelation with severity of tumor and subsequent metastasis as well as chemoresistance and consequent poor outcome as has been evidenced by increased mortality in carcinomas of bladder, breast, brain, cervix, ovaries and malignant melanomas. [29] Levels of reactive oxygen species increase during use of inhalational agents, thus revealing another pathway by which these agents upregulate HIFs. [28] In fact isoflurane exposure in ovarian cancer cells has been associated with enhanced tumor cell multiplication and production of metastatic markers resulting in enhanced metastatic potential. [30] In vitro studies have elucidated the diminution of interferon induced NK cytotoxicity by halothane as well as isoflurane. [31] Sevoflurane by altering the release of cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α) by NK-cells is equally putative. [32] In humans, however isoflurane has been reported to have a beneficial effect in colon cancers. [33]

Nitrous oxide

Nitrous oxide has been incriminated in interference of DNA, purine, and thymidylate synthesis and abrogation of neutrophil funcion. [34] Experimental studies have shown nitrous oxide to be an important culprit in liver metastasis. [35] However, no significant correlation has been demonstrated between nitrous oxide exposure and tumor relapse in a randomized controlled trial. [36]

Muscle relaxants

Muscle relaxants have no effect on tumor progression.

Opioids

Opioids are being increasingly used by the anesthesiologists not only in the perioperative period but also to allay chronic cancer pain. Studies conducted over the recent years have however given intimidating results with opioids implicating them as possible culprits in cancer progression. There are myriad ways in which opioids exert their pro-tumor effect [Table 3] Opioids by stimulating the μ opioid receptors (MOR) expressed in vascular endothelium, trigger the VEGF-mediated angiogenesis. [37] They also accentuate immunosuppression. [38] Morphine, which at one time was considered to be the cancer patients' best and final friend, is in fact the most putative agent of this class. Apart from inducing angiogenesis, it also increases vascular permeability and provides a nexus for tumor spread. Studies done over the years have shown that morphine via different mechanisms can trigger as well as suppress tumor growth in vivo and in vitro. Whereas at concentrations of >10 μM, morphine attenuates tumor multiplication and its intermittent injections in vitro decreased tumor proliferation; [39],[40] Gupta et al., have elucidated tumor neovascularization in human breast xenograft model in mice in therapeutic doses of morphine. [41] This variability is due to tumor attenuation by prolonged high doses of morphine and accentuation with single or low daily dosing with morphine. [42] Morphine also exhibits anti-apoptotic effect. [43] Also it is known to inhibit adhesion and migration of 26-L5 colon tumor cells to extracellular matrix and thereby dramatically reduce lung metastasis in vitro. [44] Tramadol, which has a serotonergic as well as nor-adrenergic activity, has been shown to suppress the surgery induced lung metastasis in vitro. [45] Fentanyl inhibits the NK cell cytotoxicity postoperatively. [46] Sufentanyl and alfentanil on the other hand affect leukocyte function, inhibit NK cells and suppress mitogen triggered lymphocyte multiplication. [47]
Table 3: How morphine affects tumor progression

Click here to view


Non-steriodal Anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) and COX-inhibitors

COX-2 inhibitors have anti-angiogenesis affect and also exhibit a dramatic reduction in tumor recurrence. In fact a lower recrudesce rate of breast neoplasms has been reported in women on chronic COX-2 inhibitor therapy. [48] NSAIDS even if given as a single dose peri-operatively significantly reduces the rate of cancer recurrence post surgery. [49]


 > Effects of local anesthetic agents Top


Local anesthetic agents block afferent sensory impulses and provide adequate pain relief, reducing plasma concentration of various mediators, preserving cell mediated immunity. [50] Local anesthetics mainly act by curbing the voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSC) in the excitable state. These VGSC are expressed both in vivo as well as in vitro in various malignancies including breast cancer, cervical cancer, colon and prostrate cancers. [51] It has been found that downregulation of VGSC gene aborts the ability of the tumor cells to metastasize while the upregulation of VGSC Nav1.5 gene enhances the susceptibility of prostrate neoplastic cells to invade and spread. [51] Local anesthetic agents also have antiproliferative effect on tumor cells. This has been elucidated with lidocaine and ropivacaine on mesenchymal cells as well as human fibroblasts in vitro studies. [52],[53] Lidocaine and tetracaine are also known to impair kinesin motor machinery of neoplastic cells, which quashes microtubular protrusions and prevent metastasis [Table 4]. [54] Amides are also known to affect the Src signaling and subsequent metastasis of lung cancer cells. [55] Ropivacaine has been shown to have its anti-inflammatory role due to impairment of Src tyrosine protein kinase activity and intercellular adhesion molecule-1-phosphorylation. Lidocaine and Ropivacaine provide endothelial barrier protection in endothelial cells in lungs by decreasing adhesion of neutrophils and endothelial hypermeability, reflecting their anti-inflammatory properties. [56] Some of the antitumor effects of local anesthetic agents are also mediated via its ability act through potassium or calcium channels. These agents also inhibit transcription pathways. Cytotoxic effects also correlate with their potency and lipophilicity. [3]
Table 4: Effects of local anesthetics on tumor recurrence

Click here to view



 > Regional anesthesia techniques and cancer recurrences Top


Regional anesthesia has been found to be associated with favorable prognosis in patients undergoing oncosurgery. By aborting surgery mediated neuroendocrine stress response and preserving the immune function, regional anesthesia alone or when combined with general anesthesia has protective effect in curbing post-surgical tumor recrudesce. In a study done by Koltun et al., it has been seen that epidural anesthesia recieving patients during colectomy had lower plasma levels of epinephrine and cortisol, compared to patients receiving general anesthesia and also the NK cell activity was better preserved in patients receiving regional anesthesia. [57] Also locoregional anesthesia by providing better pain relief, significantly decreases the requirement of intra- and perioperative opioids as well as release of endogenous opioids, thereby preventing their adverse effects. Additionally, by reducing the doses of other general anesthetic agents, it attenuates immunosuppression. Another mechanism by which tumor relapse is obtunded, is by crippling of lymphatic drainage by regional anesthetics [Table 5]. [58]
Table 5: Mechanisms of regional anesthesia in preventing tumor spread

Click here to view


Peripheral nerve blocks

Peripheral nerve blocks, when performed by safe hands, can be beneficial in patients undergoing oncosurgeries, especially with perineural catheters left in situ with consequent reduction or complete avoidance of perioperative opioids for analgesia. [59] In a retrospective study done in patients with breast cancer significantly favorable survival rates were seen when paravertebral block was given (94%) as compared to those who received general anesthesia (77%). [60]

Neuraxial anesthesia

General anesthesia when combined with thoracic epidural anesthesia not only curtails surgical stress response but also preserves immunity. Experimental studies on rats have shown beneficial effects of spinal anesthesia when combined with general anesthesia during laparotomy in curtailing lung metastasis. [61] In other study done on patients with prostrate cancer when surgery was done under general anesthesia combined with epidural technique, a lower incidence of tumor relapse was observed than when general anesthesia with intravenous opioids was employed. [62]

However, certain compelling results have also been obtained with regional anesthesia techniques. In a retrospective study done on patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, no added advantage of regional anesthesia over general anesthesia was elucidated. [63] Similarly, no beneficial effects of attenuating post surgery tumor progression was seen with epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing laparotomy for colorectal cancers. [64] Most of these studies being retrospective are subject to selection bias and influenced by various confounding factors. Only prospective clinical trials can really unfold the appropriate effects of regional anesthetic techniques on tumor relapses. One such published study is the MASTER trial, done on patients undergoing major abdominal surgery who were randomized to receive general anesthesia with either opioid or epidural technique. This study had several limitations as different types of surgeries were analyzed together, so correlation with particular cancer would have been masked, was an underpowered study and details of the postoperative events like chemotherapy and radiotherapy were not available. This study demonstrated no major difference in tumor free period between the two groups; the exact dose of volatile anesthetic used, being the confounding factor in this trial. [65] Other clinical trials are underway, the results of which will unveil this enigma. These trials on patients with breast, lung and colon cancers are being conducted at Cleveland Clinic, Mater University Hospital, and University of Dusseldorf. Outcomes are expected to be in 2015, 2018, and 2022 respectively. [3]


 > Conclusion Top


Though surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for various malignancies, its associated neuroendocrine stress response coupled with immunosuppression has an adverse effect in long term tumor outcome. Its challenging to estimate cancer recurrence because follow-up of patients is irregular along with dropouts, patient only visits the oncosurgeon and he may not be aware of the implications of anesthetic agents, poor collaboration with surgical team and the anesthesiologist may concentrate only on short term outcome in terms of safe intraoperative period and may not pay attention to anesthetic agents and technique. Type of anesthetic agent used as well as the technique employed also allays or delays tumor recrudesce, thereby emphasizing the equally pivotal role of anesthesiologist. While most of the intravenous (except propofol) and volatile anesthetic agents induce post surgical tumor metastasis via different mechanisms, regional anesthetics per se by preserving immunity and attenuating neurosurgical stress response are largely protective. However, more supportive evidences are needed before extrapolating the results of these researches, for which various clinical trials are underway. Meanwhile, need of the hour is to stick to those regimens, which offer significant benefits against tumor relapses as per the available clinical data. According to the consensus statement from British Journal of Anesthesia workshop on cancer and anesthesia, anesthetic or analgesic technique might affect cancer outcomes is intriguing, there is currently insufficient evidence to support any change in clinical practice. Role of opioids is controversial, as long term opioid use in sub analgesic doses in mice without surgery suggests that it enhances cancer growth. At the same time, opioid use in analgesic doses in mouse models resembling perioperative settings, has shown either protective effect or no effect. Whether use of morphine augments risk of metastasis or recurrence after cancer surgery, is not clear. Thus, there is paucity of data to indicate any change of clinical practice. Also, Randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate the effects of adjunct medications like regional anesthesia, intravenous lidocaine and NSAIDs, on cancer recurrence during anesthesia for primary cancer surgery. Also, collaboration is needed with other specialists like medical and surgical Oncologists, to study link between anesthetic techniques and cancer outcomes in cancer patients posted for surgery. [66]

 
 > References Top

1.
American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2012. Available from: Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2012 [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 21].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Iinuma H, Wantanabe T, Mimori K, Adachi M, Hayaashi N, Tamura J, et al. Clinical significance of circulating tumor cells, including cancer stem-like cells, in peripheral blood for recurrence and prognosis in patients with Dukes′ stage B and C colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:1547-55.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Heaney A, Buggy DJ. Can anaesthetic and analgesic techniques affect cancer recurrence or metastasis? Br J Anaesth 2012;109:i17-i28.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Fidler IJ. The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: The ′seed and soil′ hypothesis revisited. Nat Rev Cancer 2003;3:453-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
O′Rianin SC, Buggy DJ, Kerin MJ, Watson RW, Moriarty DC. Inhibition of stress response to breast surgery by regional anaesthesia and analgesia does not affect vascular endothelial growth factor and prostaglandin E 2 . Anesth Analg 2005;100:244-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Sydner GL, Greenberg S. Effect of anaesthetic technique and other perioperative factors on cancer recurrence. Br J Anaesth 2010;105:106-15.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Melamed R, Rosenne E, Shakhar K, Scwartz Y, Abudarham N, Ben-Eliyahu S. Marginating pulmonary-NK activity and resistance to experimental tumor metastasis: Suppression by surgery and the prophylactic use of beta-adrenergic and prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor. Brain Behav Immun 2005;19:114-26.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Brittenden J, Heys SD, Ross J, Eremin O. Natural killer cells and cancer. Cancer 1996;77:1226-43.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Ben-Eliyahu S, Page GG, Yirmiya R, Shakhar G. Evidence that stress and surgical interventions promote tumor development by suppressing natural killer cell activity. Int J Cancer 1999;80:880-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Shakhar G, Ben-Eliyahu S. In vivo beta-adrenergic stimulation suppresses natural killer activity and compromises resistence to tumor metastasis in rats. J Immunol 1998;160:3251-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Uchida A, Kariya Y, Okamoto N, Sugie K, Fujimoto T, Yagita M. Prediction of postoperative clinical course by autologus tumor-killing activity in lung cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82:1697-701.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Penn I. The effect of immunosuppression on pre-existing cancers. Transplantation 1993;55:742-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Yang B, Kang H, Fung A, Zhao H, Wang T, Ma D. The role of interleukin 17 in tumor proliferation, angiogenesis and metastasis. Mediators Inflamm 2014;2014:623759.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Eschwege P, Dumas F, Blanchet P, Le Maire V, Benoit G, Jardin A, et al. Haematogenous dissemination of prostatic epithelial cells during radical prostatectomy. Lancet 1995;346:1528-30.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Kirman I, Cekic V, Poltaratskaia N, Asi Z, Bessler M, Huang EH, et al. Plasma from patients undergoing major open surgery stimulates in vitro tumor growth: Lower insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 levels may, in part, account for this change. Surgery 2002;132:186-92.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kirman I, Jain S, Cekic V, Belizon A, Balik E, Sylla P, et al. Altered plasma matrix metalloproteinase-9/tissue inhibitor of matrix [corrected] metalloproteinase-1 concentration during the early postoperative period in patients with colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2006;20:482-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Svendsen MN, Werther K, Nielsen HJ, Kristjansen PE. VEGF and tumour angiogenesis. Impact of surgery, wound healing, inflammation and blood transfusion. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002;37:373-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Atzil S, Arad M, Glasner A, Abiri N, Avraham R, Greenfeld K, et al. Blood transfusion promotes cancer progression: A critical role for aged erythrocytes. Anesthesiology 2008;109:989-97.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Ben-Eliyahu S, Shakhar G, Rosenne E, Levinson Y, Beilin B. Hypothermia in barbiturate-anesthetized rats suppresses natural killer cell activity and compromises resistance to tumor metastasis: A role for adrenergic mechanisms. Anesthesiology 1999;91:732-40.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Shakhar G, Ben-Eliyahu S. Potential prophylactic measures against postoperative immunosuppression: Could they reduce recurrence rates in oncological patients? Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:972-92.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Lee JW, Shahzad MM, Lin YG, Armaiz-Pena G, Mangala LS, Han HD, et al. Surgical stress promotes tumor growth in ovarian carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:2695-702.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: A randomized trial. Lancet 2002;359:2224-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Melamed R, Bar-Yosef S, Shakhar G, Shakhar K, Ben-Eliyahu S. Suppression of natural killer cell activity and promotion of tumor metastasis by ketamine, thiopental and halothane, but not by propofol: Mediating mechanisms and prophylactic measures. Anesth Analg 2003;97:1331-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Miao Y, Zhang Y, Wan H, Chen L, Wang F. GABA-receptor agonist, propofol inhibits invasion of colon carcinoma cells. Biomed Pharmacother 2010;64:583-8.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Huang H, Benzonana LL, Zhao H, Watts HR, Perry NJ, Bevan C, et al. Prostate cancer cell malignancy via modulation of HIF-1α pathway with isoflurane and propofol alone and in combination. Br J Cancer 2014;111:1338-49.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Iida M, Anna CH, Hartis J, Bruno M, Wetmore B, Dubin JR, et al. Changes in global gene and protein expression during early mouse liver carcinogenesis induced by non-genotoxic model carcinogens oxazepam and Wyeth-14,643. Carcinogenesis 2003;24:757-70.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Halapy E, Kreiger N, Cotterchio M, Sloan M. Benzodiazepines and risk for breast cancer. Ann Epidemiol 2006;16:632-6.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Tavare AN, Perry NJ, Benzonana LL, Takata M, Ma D. Cancer recurrence after surgery: Direct to indirect effects of anesthetic agents. Int J Cancer 2012;130:1237-50.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Unwith S, Zhao H, Hennah L, Ma D. The potential role of HIF on tumor progression and dissemination. Int J Cancer 2015;136:2491-503.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Luo X, Zhao H, Hennah L, Ning J, Liu J, Tu H, et al. Impact of isoflurane on malignant capability of ovarian cancer in vitro. Br J Anaesth 2014.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Markovic SN, Knight PR, Mursako DM. Inhibition of interferon stimulation of natural killer cell activity in mice anaesthetized with halothane or isoflurane. Anesthesiology 1993;78:700-6.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Mitsuhata H, Shimizu R, Yokoyama MM. Suppressive effects of volatile anaesthetics on cytokine release in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Int J Immunopharmacol 1995;17:529-34.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Lindholm ML, Granath F, Eiksson LI, Sandin R. Malignant disease within 5 years after surgery in relation to duration of sevoflurane anaesthesia and time with bispectral index under 45. Anesth Analg 2011;113:778-83.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Weimann J. Toxicity of nitrous oxide. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2003;17:47-61.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Shapiro J, Jersky J, Katzav S, Feldman M, Segal S. Anaesthetic drugs accelerate the progression of postoperative metastasis of mouse tumors. J Clin Invest 1981;68:678-85.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Fleischmann E, Marchalek C, Schlemitz K, Dalton JE, Gruenberger T, Herbst F, et al. Nitrous oxide may not increase the risk of cancer recurrence after colorectal surgery: A follow up of randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2009;9:1.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Trapaidze N, Gomes I, Cvejic S, Bansinath M, Devi LA. Opioid receptor endocytosis and activation of MAP kinase pathway. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 2000;76:220-8.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Cata JP, GottumukkalaV, Sessler DI. How regional analgesia might reduce postoperative cancer recurrence. Eur J Pain Suppl 2011;5:345-55.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Tegeder I, Grosch S, Schmidtko A, Haussler A, Schmidt H, Niederberger E, et al. G protein-independent G1 cell cycle block and apoptosis with morphine in adenocarcinoma cells: Involvement of p53 phosphorylation. Cancer Res 2003;63:1846-52.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Yeager MP, Colacchio TA. Effect of morphine on growth of metastatic colon cancer in vivo. Arch Surg 1991;126:454-6.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Gupta K, Kshirsagar S, Chang L, Schwartz R, Law PY, Yee D, et al. Morphine stimulates angiogenesis by activating proangiogenic and survival-promoting signaling and promotes breast tumor growth. Cancer Res 2002;62:4491-8.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Zong J, Pollock GM. Morphine antinociception is enhanced in mdr1a gene-deficient mice. Pharm Res 2000;17:749-53.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Suzuki S, Chuang LF, Doi RH, Chuang RY. Morphine suppresses lymphocyte apoptosis by blocking p53-mediated death signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003;308:802-8.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Harmiya Y, Koizumi K, Andoh T, Nojima H, Kuraishi Y, Saiki I. Potential ability of morphine to inhibit the adhesion, invasion and metastasis of metastatic colon 26-L5 carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett 2002;187:121-7.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Gaspani L, Bianchi M, Limiroli E, Panerai AE, Sacerdote P. The analgesic drug tramadol prevents the effect of surgery on natural killer cell activity and metastatic colonization in rats. J Neuroimmunol 2002;129:18-24.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Sacerdote P, Bianchi M, Gaspani L, Manfredi B, Maucione A, Terno G, et al. The effects of tramadol and morphine on immune responses and pain after surgery in cancer patients. Anesth Analg 2000;90:1411-4.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Shavit Y, Ben-Eliyahu S, Zeidel A, Beilin B. Effect of fentanyl on natural killer cell activity and on resistance to tumour metastasis in rats. Dose and timing study. Neuroimmunomodulation 2004;11:255-60.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Farooqui M, Li Y, Rogers T, Poonawala T, Griffin RJ, Song CW, et al. COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib prevents chronic morphine-induced promotion of angiogenesis, tumour growth, metastasis and mortality, without compromising analgesia. Br J Cancer 2007;97:1523-31.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Retsky M, Rogers R, Demicheli R, Hrushesky WJ, Gukas I, Vaidya JS, et al. NSAID analgesic ketorolac used perioperatively may suppress early breast cancer relapse: Particular relevance to triple negative subgroup. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;134:881-8.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Merquiol F, Montelimard AS, Nourissat A, Molliex S, Zufferey PJ. Cervical epidural anesthesia is associated with increased cancer-free survival in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer surgery: A retrospective propensity-matched analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2013;38:398-402.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Onkal R, Djamgoz MB. Molecular pharmacology of voltage-gated sodium channel expression in metastatic disease: Clinical potential of of neonatal Nav1.5 in breast cancer. Eur J Pharmacol 2009;625:206-19.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Lucchinetti E, Awad AE, Rahman M, Feng J, Lou PH, Zhang L, et al. Antiproliferative effects of local anesthetics on mesenchymal stem cells: Potential implications for tumor spreading and wound healing. Anesthesiology 2012;116:841-56.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Fedder C, Beck-Schimmer B, Aguirre J, Hasler M, Roth-Z′graggen B, Urner M, et al. In vitro exposure of human fibroblasts to local anaesthetics impairs cell growth. Clin Exp Immunol 2010;162:280-8.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Yoon JR, Whipple RA, Blazer EM, Cho EH, Matrone MA, Peckham M, et al. Local anesthetics inhibit kinesin motility and micotentacle protrusions in human epithelial and breast tumor cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011;129:691-701.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Piegeler T, Votta-Vells EG, Liu G, Place AT, Schwartz DE, Beck-Schimmer B, et al. Antimetastatic potential of amide-linked local anaesthetics: Inhibition of lung adenocarcinoma cell migration and inflammatory Src signaling independent of sodium channel blockade. Anesthesiology 2012;117:548-59.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Piegeler T, Votta-Velis EG, Bakhshi FR, Mao M, Carnegie G, Bonini MG, et al. Endothelial barrier protection by local anesthetics: Ropivacaine and lidocaine block tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced endothelial cell Src activation. Anesthesiology 2014;120:1414-28.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Koltun WA, Bloomer MM, Tilberq AF, Seaton JF, Ilahi O, Rung G, et al. Awake epidural anaesthesia is associated with improved natural killer cell cytotoxicity and a reduced stress response. Am J Surg 1996;171:68-72.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Ismail H, Ho KM, Narayan K, Kondalswamy-Chennakesavan S. Effect of neuraxial anaesthesia on tumor progression in cervical cancer patients treated with brachytherapy: A retrospective cohort study. Br J Anaesth 2010;105:145-9.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
Richman JM, Liu SS, Courpas G, Wong R, Rowlingson AJ, McGready J, et al. Does continuous peripheral nerve block provide superior pain control to opioids? A meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2006;102:248-57.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.
Exadaktylos AK, Buggy DJ, Moriarity DC, Mascha E, Sessler DI. Can anesthetic technique for primary breast cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis? Anesthesiology 2006;105:660-4.  Back to cited text no. 60
    
61.
Bar-Yosef S, Melamed R, Page GG, Shakhar G, Shakhar K, Ben-Eliyahu S. Attenuation of the tumor-promoting effect of surgery by spinal blockade in rats. Anesthesiology 2001;94:1066-73.  Back to cited text no. 61
    
62.
Biki B, Mascha E, Moriarty DC, Fitzpatrick JM, Sessler DI, Buggy DJ. Anesthetic technique for radical prostatectomy surgery affects cancer recurrence: A retrospective analysis. Anesthesiology 2008;109:180-7.  Back to cited text no. 62
    
63.
Tsui BC, Rashiq S, Schopflocher D, Murtha A, Broemling S, Pillay J, et al. Epidural anaesthesia and cancer recurrence rates after radical prostatectomy. Can J Anaesth 2010;57:107-12.  Back to cited text no. 63
    
64.
Day A, Smith R, Jourdan I, Fawcett W, Scott M, Rockall T. Retrospective analysis of the effect of postoperative analgesia on survival in patients after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Anaesth 2012;109:185-90.  Back to cited text no. 64
    
65.
Myles PS, Peyton P, Silbert B, Hunt J, Rig JR, Sessler DL; ANZCA Trials Group. Investigators. Perioperative epidural analgesia for major abdominal surgery for cancer and recurrence-free survival: Randomised trial. BMJ 2011;342:d1491.  Back to cited text no. 65
    
66.
Buggy DJ, Borgeat A, Cata J, Doherty DG, Doornebal CW, Forget P, et al. Consensus statement from The BJA Workshop on cancer and Anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2015;114:2-3.  Back to cited text no. 66
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  >Abstract>Introduction>Search strategies>Biology of cance...>Immune response ...>Effect of surger...>Effect of anesth...>Effects of gener...>Effects of local...>Regional anesthe...>Conclusion>Article Tables
  In this article
>References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed9489    
    Printed258    
    Emailed5    
    PDF Downloaded629    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]