Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 400-401

A critique of "American Brachytherapy Society Survey of three-dimensional imaging in gynecologic brachytherapy"


Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication29-Nov-2010

Correspondence Address:
Daya Nand Sharma
F-39, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.73327

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Sharma DN. A critique of "American Brachytherapy Society Survey of three-dimensional imaging in gynecologic brachytherapy". J Can Res Ther 2010;6:400-1

How to cite this URL:
Sharma DN. A critique of "American Brachytherapy Society Survey of three-dimensional imaging in gynecologic brachytherapy". J Can Res Ther [serial online] 2010 [cited 2020 Aug 10];6:400-1. Available from: http://www.cancerjournal.net/text.asp?2010/6/3/400/73327

Sir,

Three-dimensional imaging is increasingly being used in gynecologic brachytherapy but most centers in developing countries (including India) continue to practice point-based dosimetry rather than 3-D image-based dosimetry. Since gynecological cancers constitute the major cancer burden in India and resources are limited, there may be practical difficulties in implementing 3-D image based gynecological brachytherapy. Recently an interesting article "Three-dimensional imaging in gynecologic brachytherapy: a survey of the American Brachytherapy Society" has been published by Viswanathan et al. [1] The survey highlights the increasing use of 3-D imaging in gynecological brachytherapy. Our present critique of this article brings certain points to the notice of authors and the readers.

Firstly, though titled "Three-dimensional imaging in gynecologic brachytherapy: a survey of the American Brachytherapy Society", the study deals with only cervical brachytherapy. The survey questionnaire does not have any question pertaining to other brachytherapy procedures used for vaginal, endometrial or vulval cancers. Therefore, article should have been better titled "Three-dimensional imaging in cervical brachytherapy: a survey of the American Brachytherapy Society".

Secondly, even for cervical brachytherapy, certain important questions have been missing in the 19-point questionnaire used for this survey. The much deserving interstitial brachytherapy (IBT) for cervical carcinoma has not been addressed at all and the focus of entire study is on intracavitary radiotherapy (ICRT). Though there are guidelines/recommendations published by American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) [2-4] from time to time addressing ICRT, but there is hardly any one for cervical IBT, per se. This could be one of the reasons for declining practice of IBT. There are no consensus guidelines regarding the image guidance, dose fractionation schedules or delineation of various target or OAR volumes. The ABS guidelines published in 2000 by Nag et al., [4] did address the cervical IBT based on the study by Demanes et al., [5] Unfortunately, even after almost 10 years of that ABS study, [3] not even a single study has been published reporting the use of these guidelines for cervical IBT. It would have been certainly interesting to include certain questions in present survey [1] relating to the 3-D imaging in cervical IBT and the attitude of ABS members. This could have been of great help in framing specific guidelines for cervical IBT by ABS in future.

Thirdly, the GEC-ESTRO guidelines [6] were published almost 2 years before the present ABS survey. [1] The specific point, whether these guidelines were followed, could have been included in this survey. This attitude of the members toward GEC-ESTRO guidelines could possibly help in further improving these guidelines to enhance its acceptance.

 
 > References Top

1.Viswanathan AN, Erickson BA. Three-dimensional imaging in gynecologic brachytherapy: A survey of the American Brachytherapy Society. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76:104-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
2.Nag S, Orton C, Young D, Erickson B. American Brachytherapy Society Survey of brachytherapy practice for carcinoma of the cervix in the United States. Gynecol Oncol 1999;73:111-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Nag S, Erickson B, Thomadsen B, Orton C, Demanes JD, Petereit D. The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;48:201-11.   Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Nag S, Chao C, Erickson B, Fowler J, Gupta N, Martinez A, et al. The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for low dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;52:33-48.   Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
5.Demanes DJ, Rodriguez RR, Bendre DD, Ewing TL. High dose rate transperineal interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer: High pelvic control and low complication rates. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;45:105-12.   Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
6.Haie-Meder C, Pφtter R, Van Limbergen E, Briot E, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos J, et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): Concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. Radiother Oncol 2005;74:235-45.  Back to cited text no. 6
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
>References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1622    
    Printed77    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded168    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]